Fact Sheets

#5 - Settlements

(Updated May 17, 2007)

Jews should have a right to live anywhere. If someone said that Jews would not be permitted to live in your hometown, you'd say that was anti-Semitism, discrimination, bigotry, and yet the Palestinians are allowed to go on TV day after day and say that Jews have no right to live in the West Bank. That's anti-Semitism, discrimination, and bigotry.

Jews have been living in Judea and Samaria, the area commonly called the West Bank, for centuries, far longer than Palestinians have lived in the area. The only time Jews have been prohibited from living in the territories in recent decades was during Jordan's rule from 1948 to 1967.

The right of Jews to live in the West Bank is clear. The issue of whether they should live there is entirely separate. Israelis debate this among themselves.

The question of the future status of settlements is the subject of final status negotiations with the Palestinians. The fact that Israel agreed to discuss the matter illustrates a willingness to compromise on this issue.

Neither the Declaration of Principles of September 13, 1993, nor the Interim Agreement contain any provisions prohibiting or restricting the establishment or expansion of Jewish communities in the West Bank or Gaza Strip.

Some people argue that settlements are an "obstacle to peace." Consider these facts:

From 1948 to 1967, Jordan occupied the West Bank. Israel did not control an inch of the territory and no Jews lived there and yet no Arab state would even negotiate with Israel.

Israel did not begin to build large numbers of settlements until after 1977. That is also when Egypt negotiated peace. Israel froze settlement building afterward in the hope that other Arab states would follow Egypt's example, none did.

Israel built more settlements in the 1980's and 1990's; nevertheless, King Hussein made peace with Israel, and settlements were not an issue.

In the Oslo agreements, Israel did not agree to dismantle any settlements or freeze construction and yet the Palestinians signed them.

In negotiations with Bill Clinton and Yasser Arafat in 2000, Prime Minister Barak offered to dismantle settlements in the West Bank, but Arafat refused to make peace.

At the end of negotiations, Israel wants to incorporate as many settlements as possible within its borders while the Palestinians want to expel all Jews from the territory they control.

An estimated 80 percent of the settlers live in what are in effect suburbs of major Israeli cities such as Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Virtually the entire Jewish population believes Israel must retain these areas to ensure its security, and that they could be brought within Israel's borders with minor modifications of the 1967 border.

Of the roughly 150 settlements, with a total population in 2007 of 270,000, more than 60 percent of the Jews live in just five settlements blocs near the 1967 border. The Arab city of Nablus alone is larger than those six Jewish cities put together. It is inconceivable that Israel would evacuate large cities such as Ma’ale Adumim, with a population of more than 30,000, even after a peace agreement with the Palestinians, and even Yasser Arafat grudgingly accepted at Camp David the idea that the large settelement blocs would be part of Israel.

Strategic concerns have led both Labor and Likud governments to establish settlements. The objective is to secure a Jewish majority in key strategic regions of the West Bank, such as the Tel Aviv-Jerusalem corridor, the scene of heavy fighting in several Arab-Israeli wars.

Settlements do not violate the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits the forcible transfer of people of one state to the territory of another state that it has occupied as a result of a war. The intention was to insure that local populations who came under occupation would not be forced to move. Jews are not being forced to go to the West Bank and Gaza Strip; on the contrary, they are voluntarily moving back to places where they, or their ancestors, once lived before being expelled by others. In addition, those territories never legally belonged to either Jordan or Egypt, and certainly not to the Palestinians, who were never the sovereign authority in any part of the land.

After several years of bloodshed, terror, and stalled peace talks with the Palestinians, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon decided that Israel should act unilaterally to improve its security situation and reduce bloodshed by completely withdrawing Israeli troops and settlers in the Gaza Strip. This disengagement plan involved the dismantling of all settlements in the area, as well as four settlements in northen Samaria. Between August 16 and August 30, 2005, Israel safely evacuated more than 8,500 Israeli settlers and, on September 11, 2005, Israeli soldiers left Gaza, ending Israel's 38-year presence in the area.

Newly elected Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has proposed a new plan in which Israel would evacuate most of the settlements in the West Bank, while holding onto five large settlement blocs. This plan, known as the “realignment plan,” would be executed unilaterally if Israel cannot negotiate an agreement with the Palestinians. If the plan succeeds, it could permanently define Israel’s borders with a future Palestinian state, and ensure that Israel will maintain its Jewish majority.

Read all Fact Sheets