 |
IBM and the Holocaust

by Edwin Black
Mankind barely noticed when the concept of
massively organized information quietly emerged to become a means of
social control, a weapon of war, and a roadmap for group destruction.
The unique igniting event was the most fateful day of the last
century, January 30, 1933, the day Adolf
Hitler came to power. Hitler and his hatred of the Jews was the
ironic driving force behind this intellectual turning point. But his
quest was greatly enhanced and energized by the ingenuity and craving
for profit of a single American company and its legendary, autocratic
chairman. That company was International Business Machines, and its
chairman was Thomas J. Watson.
Der Führer's obsession with Jewish destruction was
hardly original. There had been czars and tyrants before him. But for
the first time in history, an anti-Semite
had automation on his side. Hitler didn't do it alone. He had help.
In the upside-down world of the Holocaust,
dignified professionals were Hitler's advance troops. Police officials
disregarded their duty in favor of protecting villains and persecuting
victims. Lawyers perverted concepts of justice to create anti-Jewish
laws. Doctors defiled the art of medicine to perpetrate ghastly
experiments and even choose who was healthy enough to be worked to
death-and who could be cost-effectively sent to the gas chamber.
Scientists and engineers debased their higher calling to devise the
instruments and rationales of destruction. And statisticians used
their little known but powerful discipline to identify the victims,
project and rationalize the benefits of their destruction, organize
their persecution, and even audit the efficiency of genocide. Enter
IBM and its overseas subsidiaries.
Solipsistic and dazzled by its own swirling
universe of technical possibilities, IBM was self-gripped by a special
amoral corporate mantra: if it can be done, it should be done. To the
blind technocrat, the means were more important than the ends. The
destruction of the Jewish people became even less important because
the invigorating nature of IBM's technical achievement was only
heightened by the fantastical profits to be made at a time when bread
lines stretched across the world.
So how did it work?
When Hitler came to power, a central Nazi goal was
to identify and destroy Germany's 600,000 Jews. To Nazis, Jews were
not just those who practiced Judaism,
but those of Jewish blood, regardless of their assimilation,
intermarriage, religious activity, or even conversion to Christianity.
Only after Jews were identified could they be targeted for asset
confiscation, ghettoization, deportation, and ultimately
extermination. To search generations of communal, church, and
governmental records all across Germany-and later throughout
Europe-was a cross-indexing task so monumental, it called for a
computer. But in 1933, no computer existed.
When the Reich needed to mount a systematic
campaign of Jewish economic disenfranchisement and later began the
massive movement of European Jews out of their homes and into ghettos,
once again, the task was so prodigious it called for a computer. But
in 1933, no computer existed. When the Final
Solution sought to efficiently transport Jews out of European ghettos
along railroad lines and into death camps, with timing so precise the
victims were able to walk right out of the boxcar and into a waiting
gas chamber, the coordination was so complex a task, this too called
for a computer. But in 1933, no computer existed.
However, another invention did exist: the IBM punch
card and card sorting system-a precursor to the computer. IBM,
primarily through its German subsidiary, made Hitler's program of
Jewish destruction a technologic mission the company pursued with
chilling success. IBM Germany, using its own staff and equipment,
designed, executed, and supplied the indispensable technologic
assistance Hitler's Third Reich needed to accomplish what had never
been done before-the automation of human destruction. More than 2,000
such multi-machine sets were dispatched throughout Germany, and
thousands more throughout German-dominated Europe. Card sorting
operations were established in every major concentration camp. People
were moved from place to place, systematically worked to death, and
their remains cataloged with icy automation.
IBM Germany, known in those days as Deutsche
Hollerith Maschinen Gesellschaft, or Dehomag, did not simply sell
the Reich machines and then walk away. IBM's subsidiary, with the
knowledge of its New York headquarters, enthusiastically
custom-designed the complex devices and specialized applications as an
official corporate undertaking. Dehomag's top management was comprised
of openly rabid Nazis who were arrested after the war for their Party
affiliation. IBM NY always understood-from the outset in 1933-that it
was courting and doing business with the upper echelon of the Nazi
Party. The company leveraged its Nazi Party connections to
continuously enhance its business relationship with Hitler's Reich, in
Germany and throughout Nazi-dominated Europe.
Dehomag and other IBM subsidiaries custom-designed
the applications. Its technicians sent mock-ups of punch cards back
and forth to Reich offices until the data columns were acceptable,
much as any software designer would today. Punch cards could only be
designed, printed, and purchased from one source: IBM. The machines
were not sold, they were leased, and regularly maintained and upgraded
by only one source: IBM. IBM subsidiaries trained the Nazi officers
and their surrogates throughout Europe, set up branch offices and
local dealerships throughout Nazi Europe staffed by a revolving door
of IBM employees, and scoured paper mills to produce as many as 1.5
billion punch cards a year in Germany alone. Moreover, the fragile
machines were serviced on site about once per month, even when that
site was in or near a concentration camp. IBM Germany's headquarters
in Berlin maintained duplicates of many code books, much as any IBM
service bureau today would maintain data backups for computers.
I was haunted by a question whose answer has long
eluded historians. The Germans always had the lists of Jewish names.
Suddenly, a squadron of grim-faced SS would burst into a city square
and post a notice demanding those listed assemble the next day at the
train station for deportation to the East. But how did the Nazis get
the lists? For decades, no one has known. Few have asked.
The answer: IBM Germany's census operations and similar advanced
people counting and registration technologies. IBM was founded in 1898
by German inventor Herman Hollerith
as a census tabulating company. Census was its business. But when IBM
Germany formed its philosophical and technologic alliance with Nazi
Germany, census and registration took on a new mission. IBM Germany
invented the racial census-listing not just religious affiliation, but
bloodline going back generations. This was the Nazi data lust. Not just
to count the Jews — but to identify them.
People and asset registration was only one of the
many uses Nazi Germany found for high-speed data sorters. Food
allocation was organized around databases, allowing Germany to starve
the Jews. Slave labor
was identified, tracked, and managed largely through punch cards.
Punch cards even made the trains run on time and cataloged their human
cargo. German Railway, the Reichsbahn, Dehomag's biggest customer,
dealt directly with senior management in Berlin. Dehomag maintained
punch card installations at train depots across Germany, and
eventually across all Europe.
How much did IBM know? Some of it IBM knew on a
daily basis throughout the 12-year Reich. The worst of it IBM
preferred not to know — "don't ask, don't tell" was the
order of the day. Yet IBM NY officials, and frequently Watson's
personal representatives, Harrison Chauncey and Werner Lier, were
almost constantly in Berlin or Geneva, monitoring activities, ensuring
that the parent company in New York was not cut out of any of the
profits or business opportunities Nazism presented. When U.S. law made
such direct contact illegal, IBM's Swiss office became the nexus,
providing the New York office continuous information and credible
deniability.
Certainly, the dynamics and context of IBM's
alliance with Nazi Germany changed throughout the twelve-year Reich....Make
no mistake. The Holocaust would still have occurred without IBM. To
think otherwise is more than wrong. The Holocaust would have proceeded
— and often did proceed — with simple bullets, death marches, and
massacres based on pen and paper persecution. But there is reason to
examine the fantastical numbers Hitler achieved in murdering so many
millions so swiftly, and identify the crucial role of automation and
technology. Accountability is needed.
Source: Excerpted from the introduction of IBM
and the Holocaust. Copyright © 2001 Edwin Black
|
|