Opinion Towards Terrorism
Who is winning the War on Terrorism - the United States and its allies or the terrorists? (Rasmussen Reports, October 2015)
| U.S./Allies |
26% |
| Terrorists |
46% |
| Neither |
22% |
| Not sure/No Answer |
7% |
Who
or what is the greatest threat to the
United States? (McLaughlin & Associates, May 19,
2009)
|
Total |
Terrorism |
15% |
Ourselves |
7% |
Economy |
6% |
Barack Obama |
5% |
Iraq |
4% |
Al Qaeda |
4% |
Government |
3% |
North Korea |
3% |
Immigration/Illegal Aliens |
3% |
Iran |
3% |
Don't know/Refused |
15% |
Do you think that Israel should begin negotiations
with Hamas now?...or do you think that Israel should...Not negotiate
with Hamas until it stops its attacks on Israel? (The Israel
Project National Survey, March 2008)
| Begin |
50% |
| Not negotiate |
39% |
The $3 billion the United States gives Israel
a year in foreign aid is a good investment to help Israel defend themselves
and to help the US fight terrorism. (The Israel Project National
Survey, March 2008)
| |
|
Agree |
Disagree |
| |
Total |
67% |
29% |
| By News Source |
Fox (23%) |
77% |
18% |
| CNN (13%) |
66% |
29% |
| Local News (12%) |
80% |
20% |
| NBC (10%) |
60% |
34% |
| By Party |
GOP (33%) |
76% |
20% |
| Independent (29%) |
58% |
38% |
| Democrats (37%) |
65% |
29% |
Do you believe that...Israel is a vital ally
to the US...or that...Israel is not a vital ally to the US? (The
Israel Project National Survey, March 2008)
| Vital ally |
76% |
| Not a vital ally |
19% |
The U.S. is more likely to be targeted for
terrorist attack because of our support for Israel. (ADL, October,
2007)
| |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
| Strongly agree |
35% |
30% |
34% |
| Agree |
38% |
38% |
31% |
[To those who agreed:] In your opinion, should the U.S. continue to support Israel even if it means there will be a greater risk of terrorist attacks against America or pull back from its support of Israel to minimize the risk of a terrorist attack in this country? (ADL, October, 2007)
| |
2003 |
2005 |
2007 |
| Continue to support Israel |
62% |
61% |
57% |
| Pull back from its support |
31% |
31% |
34% |
Thinking about the present situation, would you say that the world is becoming safer or more dangerous for the United States and the American people? (Foreign Policy Magazine and The Center for American Progress, May 23-June 26, 2007)
| Safer |
2 |
| Stayed the same |
7 |
| More dangerous |
91 |
What is the ONE principal reason why you think the world is becoming safer for the American people? (Foreign Policy Magazine and The Center for American Progress, May 23-June 26, 2007)
| Islamic/Muslim/Jihadist hostility/anger/animosity |
50 |
| Anti-Terrorism/Successful strategies |
50 |
What is the ONE principal reason why you think the world is becoming more dangerous for the American people? (Foreign Policy Magazine and The Center for American Progress, May 23-June 26, 2007)
| Iraq War |
39 |
| Islamic/Muslim/Jihadist hostility/anger/animosity |
19 |
| Failed/misguided/wrongheaded US policies |
16 |
| Alienated/Resentment in rest of world |
9 |
| Nuclear/WMD proliferation |
9 |
| Reduction in alliances/Less support for US leadership |
8 |
| Israel-Palestine/Middle East (non-Iraq) |
7 |
| Rise in anti-Americanism |
3 |
| Al Qaeda resurgence/momentum |
2 |
| Terrorist bases in Pakistan/Situation in Pakistan |
2 |
| Unilateralism/Unilateral force |
1 |
| No major military power as adversary |
1 |
| Not one particular reason |
1 |
| Complacency |
1 |
What is the ONE principal reason why you think the world has stayed the same for the American people? (Foreign Policy Magazine and The Center for American Progress, May 23-June 26, 2007)
| Anti-Terrorism/Successful strategies |
50 |
| Iraq War |
25 |
| Islamic/Muslim/Jihadist hostility/anger/animosity |
16 |
| Not one particular reason |
16 |
| Increase in U.S. diplomatic efforts |
16 |
| Danger is spread out across the world |
9 |
| Less attacks outside Iraq/Tougher environment for terrorists |
9 |
In your view, what is the SINGLE GREATEST threat to U.S. national security? (Foreign Policy Magazine and The Center for American Progress, May 23-June 26, 2007)
| Nuclear materials/weapons |
26 |
| Islamicism/Al Qaeda/Jihadists |
20 |
| Terrorism |
12 |
| Bush Administration/US leaders/Intelligence failures/Unilateralism |
11 |
| WMD's |
9 |
| Overextended US/inability to meet multiple challenges |
6 |
| Iran |
3 |
| Climate Change |
3 |
| Economic decline |
2 |
| China |
2 |
| Continued Iraq war/Middle-East conflict |
2 |
| Biological terrorism |
2 |
| Anti-Americanism |
1 |
| Poverty in developed world |
1 |
| Non-state groups/actors |
1 |
Below is a list of U.S. policy objectives. Please choose the one you believe is most important to achieve in the next five years. (Foreign Policy Magazine and The Center for American Progress, May 23-June 26, 2007)
| Winning the hearts and minds of the Muslim world |
30 |
| A stable, secure Iraq |
15 |
| A global decline in terrorist violence |
11 |
| An Iran that renounces uranium enrichment |
10 |
| U.S. energy security |
10 |
| No new nuclear arms races |
8 |
| (International consensus/Moral leadership/Alliances) |
5 |
| A stable, secure Afghanistan |
1 |
| (Development of nation-building capacity) |
1 |
| (Pakistan security/Nuclear program) |
1 |
| Other |
9 |
Which two countries are most likely to transfer nuclear technology to terrorists in the next three to five years? (Foreign Policy Magazine and The Center for American Progress, May 23-June 26, 2007)
| Pakistan |
74 |
| North Korea |
42 |
| Russia |
38 |
| Iran |
31 |
| United States |
5 |
| Other |
8 |
| None of these |
2 |
What country/region is most likely to become the next Al Qaeda stronghold? (Foreign Policy Magazine and The Center for American Progress, May 23-June 26, 2007)
| Pakistan |
35 |
| Iraq |
22 |
| Somalia |
11 |
| Sudan |
8 |
| Afghanistan |
7 |
| Palestinian territories |
5 |
| United Kingdom |
2 |
| Lebanon |
2 |
| Egypt |
1 |
| Western Europe |
1 |
| Algeria |
1 |
| Other |
5 |
Do you see international terror as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all over the next ten years? (World Public Opinion.org, December 11, 2006)
| Critical Threat |
68% |
| An important, but not critical threat |
27% |
| Not an important threat at all |
4% |
| Refused/Don't Know |
2% |
Do you see terror attacks in your country as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all over the next ten years? (World Public Opinion.org, December 11, 2006)
| Critical Threat |
68% |
| An important, but not critical threat |
27% |
| Not an important threat at all |
4% |
| Refused/Don't Know |
1% |
Which position is closer to yours: (The Worldpublicopinion.org/knowledge
Networks Poll, 11/21-29/06)
| The only way to counter
the threat of terrorism is to find and
destroy terrorists. It is naive
and pointless to try to understand
their intentions or imagine that we can
address any
of their concerns |
35% |
| Trying to destroy terrorists is not
enough because if we are too
heavy-handed, it just breeds more hostility
and more terrorists.
It is necessary to address the sources
of the hostility in the larger
societies that the terrorists come from |
61% |
Please indicate which of the following
two statements comes closer to your own
view. (The Worldpublicopinion.org/knowledge
Networks Poll, 11/21-29/06)
| The threat of terrorism
is the most important issue of our time,
and we should be willing to do whatever
it takes to fight it |
27% |
| While terrorism is an important threat
it is important to remember
that it is not the only one we face.
We should not let our concern
about terrorism overwhelm all other priorities |
71% |
Do you think terrorism
is or not a threat to your country? (Gallup International, July-September,
2006)
(% that believes terrorism is a threat to
their country)
| Colombia |
97% |
| India |
97% |
| Israel |
93% |
| USA |
93% |
| Peru |
91% |
| UK |
90% |
| Indonesia |
89% |
| Russia |
87% |
| Spain |
85% |
| Turkey |
85% |
| France |
84% |
| Germany |
82% |
| Panama |
82% |
| Thailand |
82% |
| Italy |
80% |
| Canada |
80% |
| Singapore |
78% |
| Pakistan |
76% |
| Denmark |
73% |
| Venezuela |
71% |
Do you think that the
war in Iraq has increased, decreased,
or had no effect on the likelihood of terrorist
attacks around the world? (BBC
World Service, October 2005-January 2006)
| |
Increased |
Decreased |
Has
had no effect |
Other/DK/NA
(vol) |
Afghanistan |
39 |
29 |
20 |
12 |
Argentina |
76 |
3 |
11 |
11 |
Australia |
73 |
4 |
19 |
3 |
Brazil |
56 |
15 |
27 |
3 |
Canada |
69 |
5 |
22 |
5 |
Chile |
47 |
16 |
23 |
14 |
China |
85 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
Congo |
44 |
16 |
21 |
20 |
Egypt |
83 |
1 |
6 |
10 |
Finland |
82 |
4 |
11 |
3 |
France |
67 |
3 |
27 |
4 |
Germany |
80 |
4 |
14 |
2 |
Ghana |
42 |
30 |
5 |
23 |
Great
Britain |
77 |
3 |
17 |
3 |
India |
44 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
Indonesia |
72 |
7 |
10 |
11 |
Iran |
77 |
12 |
8 |
3 |
Iraq |
75 |
12 |
11 |
2 |
Italy |
81 |
1 |
15 |
3 |
Kenya |
41 |
34 |
10 |
15 |
Mexico |
10 |
12 |
59 |
19 |
Nigeria |
29 |
49 |
6 |
16 |
Philippines |
61 |
13 |
8 |
18 |
Poland |
76 |
6 |
12 |
5 |
Russia |
58 |
5 |
26 |
12 |
Saudi
Arabia |
49 |
2 |
9 |
40 |
Senegal |
61 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
South
Africa |
42 |
18 |
10 |
30 |
South
Korea |
84 |
4 |
12 |
0 |
Spain |
79 |
4 |
12 |
5 |
Sri
Lanka |
31 |
6 |
10 |
53 |
Tanzania |
49 |
37 |
7 |
7 |
Turkey |
64 |
6 |
14 |
17 |
United
States |
55 |
21 |
21 |
3 |
| Zimbabwe |
44 |
16 |
8 |
32 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Average |
60 |
12 |
15 |
13 |
AGREE/DISAGREE: The U.S. is more likely to be targeted for terrorist
attack because of our support for Israel? (ADL, March 18-25, 2005)
ASKED TO THOSE WHO AGREE: In your opinion, should the US …? (ADL, March 18-25, 2005)
| Continue to support Israel even if it means there
will be a greater risk of terrorist attacks against America |
61% |
| Pull back from its support of Israel to minimize the risk of a
terrorist attack in this country |
31% |
Next, I'd like to get your overall opinion of some
people who were in the news this year. As I read each name, please say
if you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of this person —
or if you have never heard of him or her: Palestinian leader Yasser
Arafat. (Gallup)
| |
1/6-8/94* |
12/4-6/98 |
12/28-29/98 |
5/7-9/99 |
7/6-9/00 |
10/25-28/00 |
2/5-6/02 |
5/20-22/02 |
| Favorable |
23% |
24% |
35% |
26% |
27% |
18% |
17% |
7% |
| Unfavorable |
52% |
47% |
45% |
44% |
45% |
64% |
73% |
80% |
| Never heard of |
8% |
9% |
5% |
6% |
8% |
6% |
3% |
3% |
| No Opinion |
17% |
20% |
15% |
24% |
20% |
12% |
7% |
10% |
* Asked as PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat
If you had to choose, who has been the greater victim
of violence ...? (Center for Security Policy, June, 2003)
| The Israelis |
40% |
| The Palestinians |
21% |
| Don't know |
39% |
And again, if you had to choose, which side do you
think is more eager to bring about an end to the violence? (Center
for Security Policy, June, 2003)
| The Israelis |
48% |
| The Palestinians |
15% |
| Don't know |
37% |
And in your opinion, have the Palestinian leaders
engaged in a sustained fight against terrorists and dismantled their
infrastructure or have they not taken these steps? (Center for Security
Policy, June, 2003)
| Fought against terrorists |
10% |
| Not taken these steps |
73% |
| Don't know/Refused |
17% |
Do you think of organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah
as terrorists or freedom fighters? If you have heard of the organizations
but have no opinion or have never heard of the organizations, just say
so. (Center for Security Policy, June, 2003)
| Terrorists |
51% |
| Freedom Fighters |
6% |
| Heard of/No Opinion |
19% |
| Never heard of |
24% |
The White House has said that force can and should
be used against terrorists and their safe havens involved in operations
intended to kill Americans. Do you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat
disagree or strongly disagree with this policy? (Center for Security
Policy, June, 2003)
| Strongly Agree |
58% |
| Somewhat Agree |
22% |
| Somewhat Disagree |
7% |
| Strongly Disagree |
7% |
| Don't know/Refused |
6% |
Does Israel have the right to use pre-emptive force
against terrorists and their safe havens? (Center for Security Policy,
June, 2003)
| Yes, have the right |
69% |
| Not have right |
18% |
| Don't know/Refused |
13% |
Now I'm going to read you a list of statements.
After each one, tell me whether you strongly agree, somewhat agree,
somewhat disagree or strongly disagree with the statement. (Center for Security Policy, June,
2003)
"The Palestinians could stop the terrorism against Israel and Israelis
if they really wanted to."
| Strongly Agree |
38% |
| Somewhat Agree |
29% |
| Somewhat Disagree |
17% |
| Strongly Disagree |
9% |
| Don't know/Refused |
8% |
"Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other arab countries could stop the terrorism
against Israel and Israelis if they really wanted to."
| Strongly Agree |
42% |
| Somewhat Agree |
26% |
| Somewhat Disagree |
13% |
| Strongly Disagree |
10% |
| Don't know/Refused |
10% |
"The Arabs should be required to recognize Israel's right to exist
as a Jewish state before Israel is required to recognize a new Palestinian
state."
| Strongly Agree |
36% |
| Somewhat Agree |
24% |
| Somewhat Disagree |
16% |
| Strongly Disagree |
11% |
| Don't know/Refused |
14% |
"Israel should not give up land that could be used by terrorist
organizations to launch raids into Israeli territory even if the Palestinians
promised to make peace with Israel."
| Strongly Agree |
37% |
| Somewhat Agree |
25% |
| Somewhat Disagree |
15% |
| Strongly Disagree |
11% |
| Don't know/Refused |
12% |
Do you think that Israel's struggle with the Palestinians
is best described as a part of the war on terrorism, like the US struggle
with Al Qaeda; as a conflict between two national groups fighting over
the same piece of land; OR would you describe it some other way? (PIPA, May 8, 2002)
| Part of war on terrorism |
17% |
| Conflict over land |
46% |
| Other |
29% |
| Don't know |
7% |
Do you think that Israel's struggle with the Palestinians
is best described as a part of the war on terrorism, like the US struggle
with Al Qaeda; as a conflict between two national groups fighting over
the same piece of land; OR would you describe it some other way? (PIPA, May 8, 2002)
| Part of war on terrorism |
17% |
| Conflict over land |
46% |
| Other |
29% |
| Don't know |
7% |
There is a controversy over whether the
military actions Israel has taken in the West Bank in recent
weeks were all legitimate means of trying to root out terrorists,
or if they were also meant to punish the general Palestinian
population. Which of the following best describes
your impression of the purpose of the operation? (PIPA,
May 8, 2002)
| The Israelis have been primarily
trying to punish the population |
21% |
| The Israelis have only been
trying to root out terrorists, though they may have hurt
some civilians unintentionally, OR |
36% |
| The Israelis have been primarily
trying to root out terrorists, but in some cases have
also tried to punish the population |
34% |
| Don't know |
8% |
Here is the Israeli position on this
issue:
To capture the organizers of terrorist attacks that killed
scores of Israeli civilians, Israeli forces had no choice
but to seek out the terrorists. Israel was forced to do this
because the Palestinian Authority has reneged on its own
commitment to prevent terrorism. The Israeli forces had orders
to avoid hurting civilians and to surgically target the terrorists.
The extensive damage that occurred was in the context of
difficult house-to-house fighting. Israel only acted like
the US in Afghanistan in seeking out terrorists who murder
its citizens. Do you find this statement convincing or unconvincing?
Would that be very or somewhat (un)convincing? (PIPA,
May 8, 2002)
| Very convincing |
28% |
| Somewhat convincing |
24% |
| Somewhat unconvincing |
20% |
| Very unconvincing |
20% |
| Don't know |
7% |
Here is the Palestinian position on this
issue:
Israeli forces have killed women and children, bulldozed
entire neighborhoods crushing the people living there, fired
missiles into densely populated areas, blocked access of
ambulances, and cut off electricity and water to whole towns
for long periods. The Red Cross has declared that Israel
has violated the Geneva conventions, UN agencies have protested
Israeli actions, and the UN has created a fact-finding team
which Israel is resisting. Clearly these actions are designed
to hurt innocent Palestinian civilians, not just to target
terrorist groups. Do you find this statement convincing or
unconvincing? Would that be very or somewhat (un)convincing? (PIPA, May 8, 2002)
| Very convincing |
31% |
| Somewhat convincing |
22% |
| Somewhat unconvincing |
18% |
| Very unconvincing |
19% |
| Don't know |
9% |
Now, having heard both of these positions,
which of the following best describes your impression of
the purpose of the operation:? (PIPA, May 8, 2002)
| The Israelis have been primarily
trying to punish the population |
21% |
| The Israelis have only been
trying to root out terrorists, though they may have hurt
some civilians unintentionally, OR |
30% |
| The Israelis have been primarily
trying to root out terrorists, but in some cases have
also tried to punish the population |
37% |
| Don't know |
10% |
Another controversy is whether Palestinian
attacks on Israeli civilians are a justifiable means for
the Palestinians to put pressure on Israel.
Here is a statement in support of the
view that such attacks are not justifiable.
Deliberate and premeditated targeting of unarmed civilians
in stores and markets and religious ceremonies is murder
and nothing more. This is evil, and no grievance or perceived
grievance can justify such acts against innocent civilians.
If the suicide bombers succeed in bringing Israel to its
knees, this will only encourage more suicide bombing all
around the world, including the US. Do you find this statement
convincing or unconvincing? Would that be very or somewhat
(un)convincing? (PIPA, May 8, 2002)
| Very convincing |
57% |
| Somewhat convincing |
21% |
| Somewhat unconvincing |
8% |
| Very unconvincing |
9% |
| Don't know |
6% |
Here is a statement in support of the
view that such attacks are justifiable:
For over thirty years, in violation of UN resolutions, Israel
has occupied Palestinian territories, confiscated land, and
killed hundreds of Palestinian civilians. Faced with an overwhelming
military power, the Palestinians' only option is to attack
Israeli civilians to press Israel to stop killing Palestinian
civilians and end its occupation. Under international law,
a person who is under occupation has a right to resist the
occupier. Do you find this statement convincing or unconvincing?
Would that be very or somewhat (un)convincing? (PIPA,
May 8, 2002)
| Very convincing |
18% |
| Somewhat convincing |
23% |
| Somewhat unconvincing |
21% |
| Very unconvincing |
28% |
| Don't know |
9% |
Now, having heard both of these statements,
are you more inclined to believe that Palestinian attacks
on Israeli civilians are justifiable or not justifiable as
a means for the Palestinians to put pressure on Israel to
end its occupation? (PIPA, May 8, 2002)
| Justifiable |
16% |
| Not justifiable |
76% |
| Don't know |
7% |
Please tell me whether you strongly agree,
somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly agree with
the following statement: "If Israel fails to stop suicide
bombing as a terrorist tactic, the same tactic may be used
in the United States." (ADL, April 26-May 6, 2002)
Some people have said that the September
11th attacks on the U.S. signify a new and dangerous era
in our country's history -- potentially as important as the
Cold War between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
Others say that the U.S. and our allies have the necessary
strength and determination to win the war on terrorism --
and while the September 11th attacks were terrible events,
they do not signify a new and dangerous era for the American
people.
Which one of these statements is closer to your own view? (ADL, April 26-May 6, 2002)
| |
2002 |
10/2001 |
| Likely |
68% |
84% |
| Unlikely |
27% |
12% |
How likely is it that there will be another
major terrorist attack in the U.S. within the next 12 months? (ADL, April 26-May 6, 2002
| New and dangerous era |
59% |
| Not a new and dangerous era |
33% |
Thinking about Israels ties with the U.S.,
do you think Israels current military action will make it more
difficult for the U.S. to win the war on terrorism, or not? (Gallup/CNN/USA Today, April 3, 2002)
| Yes, more difficult |
54% |
| No, not |
35% |
| No Opinion |
11% |
If the U.S. reduced its level of support for Israel,
do you think this would decrease the likelihood of future acts of terrorism
against the U.S., or would it make no difference? (Gallup/CNN/USA
Today, April 5-7, 2002)
| Yes, decrease |
21% |
| No, makes no difference |
74% |
| Increase (vol.) |
4% |
| No Opinion |
1% |
As you may know, U.S. policy says that anyone who
harbors terrorists will be treated as an enemy of the United States.
Do you think that policy should or should not apply to Palestinian Leader
Yasser Arafat? (Gallup/CNN/USA Today, April 3, 2002)
| Yes, should apply |
77% |
| No, should not |
16% |
| No Opinion |
7% |
Would you describe Palestinian Leader Yasser Arafat
as an enemy of the United States, or not? (Gallup/CNN/USA Today,
April 5-7, 2002
| Yes, enemy |
59% |
| No, not enemy |
34% |
| No Opinion |
7% |
What should the Israelis do with Yasser Arafat --
[ROTATED: kill him, send him into exile, or let him go]? (Gallup/CNN/USA
Today, April 3, 2002
| Kill him |
12% |
| Send him into exile |
52% |
| Let him go |
22% |
| No Opinion |
7% |
Do you believe these acts
are/were justified or unjustified? (USA
Today/CNN/Gallup poll, March 1-3, 2002, for
U.S. data and 2002 Gallup Poll of the Islamic
World for Islamic country data)
| |
World Trade Center/Pentagon
Attacks |
U.S. military action
in Afghanistan |
| |
Justified |
Unjustified |
Justified |
Unjustified |
| USA |
6% |
90% |
77% |
12% |
| Iran |
13% |
68% |
9% |
78% |
| Kuwait |
36%
|
38%
|
17%
|
69%
|
| Lebanon |
20%
|
70%
|
20%
|
69%
|
| Pakistan |
18%
|
61%
|
4%
|
80%
|
| Turkey |
9%
|
77%
|
19%
|
60%
|
Do you believe groups
of Arabs carried out the attacks against the
USA on Sept. 11? (USA Today/CNN/Gallup
poll, March 1-3, 2002, for U.S. data and 2002
Gallup Poll of the Islamic World for Islamic
country data)
| |
True |
Not True |
No Opinion |
| USA |
90% |
7% |
3% |
| Iran |
15% |
59% |
22% |
| Kuwait |
11%
|
89%
|
-
|
| Lebanon |
42%
|
58%
|
-
|
| Pakistan |
4%
|
86%
|
10%
|
| Turkey |
46%
|
43%
|
11%
|
Now I would like to mention
several actions that might be taken in the
war against terrorism, and for each one please
tell me whether you think the U.S. should
or should not take that action. (Wall Street Journal/NBC News, December 8-10,
2001)
| |
Should Take Action |
Should Not Take Action |
Depends (VOL) |
Not Sure |
| Take military
action against terrorist cells in other
countries, such as the Philippines, Somalia
and the Sudan. |
64% |
23% |
6% |
7% |
| Take military
action against Iraq and Saddam Hussein
if he continues to keep UN inspectors
out of Iraq, even if it means that most
of our current allies would not join us. |
61% |
28% |
5% |
6% |
| Take military
action to overthrow Saddam Hussein, even
if it requires using a great number of
American ground troops. |
57% |
31% |
6% |
6% |
From what you know about
Islam and its religious teachings, do you
think the suicide bombings and other violence
by some followers of Islam... (Newsweek, December 6-7, 2001)
| Represent a perversion of
Islam by extremists (or) |
70% |
| Reflect an important part
of Islam's teachings (or) |
18% |
| Don't know |
12% |
Has the war on terrorism
made you think that the United States' relations
toward Israel should be closer, more distant,
or stay the same? (Wall Street Journal/NBC
News)
| |
11/11/01 |
10/7/01 |
9/16/01 |
| Closer |
29% |
30% |
33% |
| More distant |
14% |
13% |
16% |
| Stay the same |
48% |
48% |
42% |
| Not sure |
9%
|
9%
|
9%
|
Recently, President Bush said he wants
to send a clear signal to PLO Leader Yasser Arafat to end
the Palestinian violence against the Israelis. He ha refused
to meet with Arafat and has said that Israel cannot be expected
to negotiate under the threat of terrorism. What is your
reaction to these statements and this policy? Do you... this
specific effort by President Bush? (Luntz, 2001 Republican
Jewish Coalition Survey, November 2001)
| Approve |
79% |
| Oppose |
14% |
| Don't know/Refused |
7% |
Do you favor or oppose using American
military force against terrorist groups that were behind
the September 11 attacks? (Program on International Policy
Attitudes, November 1-4, 2001)
| Strongly favor |
82.3% |
| Somewhat favor |
8.7% |
| Somewhat oppose |
3.1% |
| Strongly oppose |
5% |
| Don't know/Refused |
.9% |
What about using American
military force against groups in other countries
that have committed international terrorist
acts, but were NOT behind the September 11
attacks? (Program on International Policy
Attitudes, November 1-4, 2001)
| Strongly favor |
51.6% |
| Somewhat favor |
25.0% |
| Somewhat oppose |
10.2% |
| Strongly oppose |
9.3% |
| Don't know/Refused |
3.5% |
What about working through
the UN to strengthen international laws against
terrorism and to make sure UN members cooperate
in enforcing them? (Program on International
Policy Attitudes, November 1-4, 2001)
| Strongly favor |
70.6% |
| Somewhat favor |
19.2% |
| Somewhat oppose |
1.6% |
| Strongly oppose |
4.9% |
| Don't know/Refused |
3.6% |
What about putting greater pressure on
both Israel and the Palestinians to reduce
their level of conflict? (Program on International
Policy Attitudes, November 1-4, 2001)
| Strongly favor |
49.2% |
| Somewhat favor |
25.1% |
| Somewhat oppose |
6.0% |
| Strongly oppose |
12.1% |
| Don't know/Refused |
7.5% |
What about making a major effort to be
seen as even-handed in the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict? (Program on International Policy
Attitudes, November 1-4, 2001)
| Strongly favor |
34.2% |
| Somewhat favor |
29.1% |
| Somewhat oppose |
10.6% |
| Strongly oppose |
10.0% |
| Don't know/Refused |
16.0% |
How important is it for the war on terrorism
to be seen by the world as an effort of many
countries working together, not just a US
effort? Is it very important, somewhat important,
not too important, or not at all important? (Program on International Policy Attitudes, November 1-4, 2001)
| Very important |
82.0% |
| Somewhat important |
13.4% |
| Not too important |
1.9% |
| Not at all important |
2.5% |
| Don't know/Refused |
.3% |
If Osama Bin Laden were captured, we would
need to decide whether he would be tried in
a federal court in New York or in an International
Criminal Tribunal. Some say it would be better
to have Bin Laden tried in an International
Criminal Tribunal because it would be more
likely that the world would view the trial
as impartial and less likely to lead to further
terrorist attacks against the US. Others say
it would be better to have Bin Laden tried
in New York because the crime took place in
America and we can be more confident that
justice will be done. Do you think it would
be better to have bin Laden tried in an International
Criminal Tribunal or in New York? (Program
on International Policy Attitudes, November
1-4, 2001)
| International Criminal Tribunal |
49.3% |
| New York |
43.9% |
| Don't know/Refused |
6.8% |
Please tell me which if the following
positions is closer to yours: A. In the current
military action in Afghanistan, it would be
better if more countries would join with us,
because then it would be an international
effort, not just an American one. B. In the
current military action in Afghanistan, it
would be better NOT to get more countries
involved, because if we did the operation
would get bogged down by having to make decisions
together with these other countries. (Program
on International Policy Attitudes, November
1-4, 2001)
| Better if more countries
join us |
73.1% |
| Better NOT to get other
countries |
24.1% |
| Don't know/Refused |
2.4% |
Which of the following do you think should
be the objective of a campaign against terrorist
organizations?
A. Limiting the campaign to defeating, capturing,
or killing Osama bin Laden and his terrorist
network.
B. Broadening the campaign to defeating, capturing,
or killing members of major international
terrorist organizations, even if they were
not involved in this specific attack. (Program on International Policy Attitudes, November 1-4, 2001)
| Limit to Bin Laden and network |
27.8% |
| Broaden to major terror
organizations |
66.9% |
| Don't know/Refused |
5.3% |
Given America's current struggle with
terrorism, do you think it is reasonable or
not reasonable for the US to expect Israel
to make a special effort to reduce its level
of conflict with the Palestinians? (Program
on International Policy Attitudes, November
1-4, 2001)
| Reasonable |
63.9% |
| Not Reasonable |
24.5% |
| Don't know/Refused |
11.6% |
Do you favor or oppose sending US troops
into Iraq to overthrow Saddam Hussein's government? (Program on International Policy Attitudes, November 1-4, 2001)
| Favor |
60.8% |
| Oppose |
28.5% |
| Don't know/Refused |
7.0% |
In the event that the UN has evidence
that there is an international terrorist group
operating in a country, there are a number
of things that the UN Security Council might
consider doing. I'm going to read some of
these options, and for each one I would like
to know if you think this is the kind of thing
the UN Security Council should be ABLE to
do, or if you think this would make it too
powerful. (Program on International Policy
Attitudes, November 1-4, 2001)
What about requiring the country to
allow a UN-sponsored police force to enter
the country and conduct investigations?
| Should be able |
69.8% |
| Too powerful |
25.3% |
| Don't know/Refused |
5.0% |
What about requiring the country to
freeze the assets of the suspected terrorist
group?
| Should be able |
85.5% |
| Too powerful |
11.7% |
| Don't know/Refused |
2.7% |
What about requiring the country to
provide intelligence on the suspected terrorist
group?
| Should be able |
88.3% |
| Too powerful |
7.0% |
| Don't know/Refused |
4.7% |
What about requiring the country to
arrest the suspected terrorist group?
| Should be able |
86.9% |
| Too powerful |
10.0% |
| Don't know/Refused |
3.0% |
What about sending in an international
military force to capture the suspected
terrorist group, if the country refuses
to do so?
| Should be able |
81.8% |
| Too powerful |
13.2% |
| Don't know/Refused |
5.1% |
Please tell me which of the following
statements is closer to your own view:
A. Because Islamic religious and social traditions
are intolerant and fundamentally incompatible
with Western culture, violent conflict is
bound to keep happening.
B. Though there are some fanatics in the Islamic
world, most people there have needs and wants
like those of people everywhere, so it is
possible for us to find common ground. ? (Program on International Policy Attitudes, November 1-4, 2001)
| Violent conflict |
26.0% |
| Common ground |
67.6% |
| Don't know/Refused |
6.5% |
Do you think that the
United States support of Israel was a major
factor in the terrorist attacks against the
United States [9/11/01], or do you think the
attacks would have happened regardless of
the United States support of Israel? (New
Atlantic Initiative/Chicago Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| Major factor |
30% |
| Happened regardless |
63% |
| DK/Refused |
7% |
Do you believe that after
the World Trade Center terrorist attack [9/11/01],
if the United States forced Israel to give
up territory to Yasser Arafat for a Palestinian
state including the dividing of Jerusalem,
that it would end terrorism against the United
States, or would it encourage terrorism by
rewarding those who support terrorism like
Arafat? (New Atlantic Initiative/Chicago
Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| End terrorism |
10% |
| Encourage terrorism |
62% |
| DK/Refused |
29% |
If it is discovered that
Saddam Hussein and Iraq were involved in state
sponsored terrorism against the United States
and Israel, which nation would you prefer
to carry out the military missions against
Saddam Hussein? (New Atlantic Initiative/Chicago
Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| United States only |
23% |
| Israel only |
3% |
| Both |
57% |
| Neither |
10% |
| DK/Refused |
29% |
Should the American media,
like CNN and major networks give unfiltered
access to Osama bin Laden to reach the American
public? (New Atlantic Initiative/Chicago
Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| Yes |
25% |
| No |
70% |
| DK/Refused |
6% |
Do you think the Muslim community around
the world is doing all it can to stop terrorist
attacks by radical Muslims against the United
States? (New Atlantic Initiative/Chicago
Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| Yes |
17% |
| No |
71% |
| DK/Refused |
12% |
Should Arab-Americans
who have publicly or privately supported terrorist
groups like Hamas, or Hezbollah, be invited
to the White House? (New Atlantic Initiative/Chicago
Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| Yes |
7% |
| No |
88% |
| DK/Refused |
6% |
If the President succeeds
in his plan to defeat Osama bin Laden's terrorist
network, do you think that will be the end
of major terrorist attacks on the United States,
or will they continue? (New Atlantic Initiative/Chicago
Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| End |
11% |
| Continue |
83% |
| DK/Refused |
6% |
Would you approve or disapprove of Congress
launching hearings and an investigation into
the intelligence failures of the FBI and the
CIA ? (New Atlantic Initiative/Chicago
Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| Approve |
68% |
| Disapprove |
26% |
| DK/Refused |
7% |
Do you think that if the
United States is able to defeat the terrorists
in Afghanistan, the United States should continue
on to defeat terrorist support in Iraq? (New Atlantic Initiative/Chicago Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| Yes |
80% |
| No |
13% |
| DK/Refused |
8% |
Should the United States
insist that Russia stop selling military and
nuclear technology to Iran and Iraq? (New
Atlantic Initiative/Chicago Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| Yes |
89% |
| No |
7% |
| DK/Refused |
4% |
Do you or anyone in your
household in which you live have a friend,
family member or business associate who was
killed or injured in the September 11th terror
attacks at the World Trade Center or the Pentagon? (New Atlantic Initiative/Chicago Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| Yes |
13% |
| No |
86% |
| DK/Refused |
2% |
Would you approve or disapprove
of ending immigration and visitor visas for
any and all people trying to enter the United
States from any country who sponsors terrorism,
or has relations with any terrorist linked
nations, unless that persons qualifies for
political asylum? (New Atlantic Initiative/Chicago
Sun Times, Oct. 15, 2001)
| Approve |
70% |
| Disapprove |
26% |
| DK/Refused |
4% |
Now I'm going to read
you a list of groups and others and I'd like
to know if you think they have done enough
to support the United States and oppose terrorism
since the attacks on September 11 [2001]. (Newsweek, October 4-5, 2001)
| |
Done
Enough |
Failed
to do Enough |
DK |
| Muslim leaders
in the United States |
40% |
43% |
17% |
| Moderate Muslim
leaders from other countries |
25% |
58% |
17% |
| Religious leaders
in other countries who are not Muslim |
38% |
42% |
20% |
| The NATO countries
in Europe |
53% |
32% |
15% |
| Saudi Arabia |
24% |
58% |
18% |
| Israel |
38% |
43% |
19% |
In your opinion, how likely
is it that more terrorist attacks will be
carried out against major U.S. cities, buildings
or national landmarks in the near future.
Is it...(Newsweek, 2001)
| |
10/4-5/01 |
9/27-28/01 |
9/20-21/01 |
9/13-14/01 |
| Very likely |
39% |
33% |
41% |
43% |
| Somewhat likely |
40% |
46% |
41% |
39% |
| Not too likely |
13% |
14% |
11% |
12% |
| Not at all likely |
4% |
4% |
4% |
3% |
| Don't know |
4% |
3% |
3% |
3% |
In your opinion, how soon -- if ever --
should the United States use military force
against Osama bin Laden or others linked to
the terrorist attacks of September 11 [2001]?
Do you think military action... (Newsweek, 2001)
| |
10/4-5/01 |
9/27-28/01 |
9/20-21/01 |
| Should have
ALREADY started |
24% |
18% |
17% |
| Should start
within the next few weeks |
11% |
10% |
15% |
| Should start
within the next six months |
4% |
4% |
6% |
| Should take
as long as is necessary to plan something
that will work OR |
55% |
63% |
59% |
| Should NOT be
considered at all |
2% |
2% |
1% |
| Don't know |
3% |
3% |
2% |
Now I'm going to read
you a list of different things that might
have motivated terrorists to attack the United
States. As I read each one, please tell me
if you think it is a major reason, a minor
reason or not a reason why terrorists have
targeted the U.S. (Newsweek, 2001)
| |
10/4-5/01 |
9/20-21/01 |
| |
Major |
Minor |
Not |
Major |
Minor |
Not |
| Opposition to U.S. ties
to Israel and U.S. policies toward the
Palestinian situation |
58% |
23% |
11% |
68% |
21% |
5% |
| Resentment of the impact
of U.S. culture, such as movies and other
popular entertainment in Muslim countries |
28% |
39% |
27% |
28% |
39% |
26% |
| Economic hardships in Muslim
countries created by Western capitalism |
39% |
30% |
23% |
37% |
36% |
20% |
| Opposition to the Gulf War
and U.S. military presence in the Persian
Gulf region |
47% |
32% |
16% |
53% |
32% |
11% |
| Resentment of U.S. military
and economic power in general |
62% |
24% |
10% |
64% |
22% |
9% |
Thinking about United
States policies in general in the Middle East,
should the United States consider changing
its policies in the Middle East to try to
reduce the violent backlash against the United
States or should the United States not consider
such changes? (Newsweek, Oct. 4-5,
2001)
| Should consider changing
policies |
46% |
| Should NOT consider changes |
43% |
| Don't Know/Refused |
11% |
Please tell me if you
agree or disagree with the following statement,
or if you have no opinion either way -- "The
U.S. should reduce its ties to Israel in order
to lessen the acts of terrorism against us." (Newsweek)
| |
3/21-22/02 |
10/18-19/01 |
10/4-5/01 |
9/13-14/01 |
7/85/01 |
| Agree |
31% |
28% |
22% |
32% |
34% |
| Disagree |
53% |
52% |
61% |
50% |
48% |
| No opinion/Don't Know |
16% |
20% |
17% |
18% |
18% |
Do you think that reducing
U.S. ties to Israel WOULD reduce the amount
of terrorist acts directed against the United
States." (Newsweek, Oct.
4-5, 2001)
| Yes, would reduce terrorist
acts |
27% |
| No, would not |
63% |
| Don't Know |
10% |
I'd like to find out what
you think the impact of the United States
endorsing the idea of a Palestinian state
would be. First, do you think this would help
the United States' effort to build a coalition
to fight terrorism, hurt the U.S. effort,
or would it not make any difference? (Newsweek,
Oct. 4-5, 2001)
| |
|
| Help fight against terrorism |
35% |
| Hurt fight against terrorism |
11% |
| Make no difference |
43% |
| Don't know |
11% |
Now a few questions about
the terrorist attacks (on the World Trade
Center and the Pentagon, September 11, 2001).)...
What's your impression, do you think that
many people in the Middle East and other non-western
nations believe the United States itself bears
some responsibility for the hatred that lead
to the terrorist attacks, or don't you think
many of them feel this way? (Pew Research
Center, September 21-25, 2001)
| Yes, many believe United
States bears some responsibility |
59% |
| No, don't think many feel
this way |
27% |
| Don't know/Refused |
14% |
When you think about the
terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center
and the Pentagon (September 11, 2001), do
you place a lot of blame, some blame or no
blame at all on United States policies in
the Middle East over the years? (CBS/New
York Times , September 20-23, 2001)
| A lot |
14% |
| Some |
54% |
| No blame at all |
30% |
| Don't know/Refused |
7% |
Do you feel the U.S. should
do whatever is necessary to find and destroy
terrorists who threaten serious harm to our
citizens or nation, or do you think such actions
would be wrong? (International Communications
Research, September 14-18, 2001)
| Yes, do whatever necessary |
92% |
| No, would be wrong |
5% |
| Don't know/Refused |
3% |
Do you feel that ISRAEL
should do whatever is necessary to find and
destroy terrorists who threaten serious harm
to ITS citizens or nation, or do you think
such actions would be wrong? (International
Communications Research, September 14-18,
2001)
| Yes, do whatever necessary |
84% |
| No, would be wrong |
9% |
| Don't know/Refused |
7% |
Have the events of the
last week [September 11 terrorist attack on
New York/Washington] given you a better understanding
of the threat that suicide bombers present
in Israel - or do you feel it hasn't changed
your perception of Israel's situation? (International
Communications Research, September 14-18,
2001)
| Yes, better understanding |
53% |
| No, hasn't changed perception |
40% |
| Don't know/Refused |
7% |
Do you agree or disagree that the U.S.
and Israel should cooperate fully in combating
terrorism? (International Communications
Research, September 14-18, 2001)
| Agree |
93% |
| Disagree |
4% |
| Don't know/Refused |
4% |
Do the events of the last week [September
11 terrorist attack on New York/Washington]
say to you that the U.S. should develop closer
relations with Israel, that we should begin
to distance ourselves from Israel, or there
should be no change in our current relationship? (International Communications Research,
September 14-18, 2001)
| Should develop closer relations
with Israel |
33% |
| Should distance ourselves
from Israel |
10% |
| No change |
43% |
| Don't know/Refused |
13% |
Which do you think is the more likely
cause of the recent terrorist attacks on the
United States -- American support for Israel
OR the growing number of Arab terrorist groups
and the countries that harbor them? (International
Communications Research, September 14-18,
2001)
| American support for Israel |
19% |
| Growing number of Arab terrorist
groups and the countries that harbor them |
66% |
| Other |
6% |
| Don't know/Refused |
9% |
Specifically, do you think the terrorist
attack (on the World Trade Center in New York
and the Pentagon in Washington DC) last Tuesday
(September 11, 2001) was a direct result of
United States' policy in the Middle East or
not?(Los Angeles Times, September
13-14, 2001)
| Yes |
58% |
| No |
23% |
| Partially (vol) |
7% |
| Don't know |
12% |
Based on what you've heard and read, over
the past few weeks and months, has violence
in the Middle East increased significantly,
increased somewhat or decreased significantly? (America Middle East Information Network,
August 2001)
| Increased significantly |
48% |
| Increased somewhat |
32% |
| Stayed the same |
7% |
| Decreased somewhat |
4% |
| Decreased significantly |
1% |
| Don't know/Refused |
8% |
From what you know of
the past few weeks' violence, would you describe
the actions of the Palestinians: (America
Middle East Information Network, August 2001)
| As terrorism |
31% |
| As warfare |
24% |
| As self-defense |
11% |
| As resistance |
10% |
| Don't know/Refused |
24% |
From what you know of
the past few weeks' violence, would you describe
the actions of Israel (America Middle
East Information Network, August 2001)
| As terrorism |
13% |
| As warfare |
20% |
| As self-defense |
32% |
| As resistance |
10% |
| Don't know/Refused |
25% |
I'm going to read you
three different points of view about what
Israel could do about bombings and other violent
acts by Palestinian Arabs. Please tell me
which point of view comes closest to your
own. (America Middle East Information
Network, August 2001)
| Israel should attempt to
prevent violent acts before they happen
by using force against those responsible
for planning and conducting them |
36% |
| Israel should limit its
response to the bombings and attacks on
its people by increasing protection around
the likely targets |
32% |
| Israel should make the concessions
the Palestinians demand |
15% |
| Don't Know/Refused |
17% |
Finally, if Israel has proof that a terrorist
is planning a suicide bomb or other act of
terrorism that is likely to result in the
deaths of Israelis, is Israel definitely justified,
probably justified, probably not justified
or definitely not justified in attempting
to kill that terrorist before that individual
kills Israelis? (America Middle East Information
Network, August 2001)
| Definitely justified |
43% |
| Probably justified |
30% |
| Probably not justified |
9% |
| Definitely not justified |
7% |
| Don't Know/Refused |
11% |
Finally, if Israel has proof that a terrorist
had carried out a terrorist act that killed
Israelis and plans to strike again, is Israel
definitely justified, probably justified,
probably not justified or definitely not justified
in attempting to kill that terrorist before
that individual kills more Israelis? (America
Middle East Information Network, August 2001)
| Definitely justified |
42% |
| Probably justified |
28% |
| Probably not justified |
11% |
| Definitely not justified |
7% |
| Don't Know/Refused |
12% |
*Note numbers may not total 100% due to rounding.
|