 |
Report on Human Rights
Practices for 1999
Tunisia
Tunisia is a republic dominated by a single political
party. President Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali and his Constitutional Democratic
Rally (RCD) party have controlled the Government, including the legislature,
since 1987. This dominance was reaffirmed in an overwhelming RCD victory in
October 24 legislative and presidential elections. July revisions to the
Constitution allowed two opposition candidates to run against Ben Ali in the
presidential elections, the first multicandidate presidential race in
Tunisia's history. Electoral Code changes also reserved approximately 20
percent of representation in the Chamber of Deputies for opposition parties
(34 of 182 seats), up from approximately 12 percent (19 of 163 seats) in the
previous Chamber, which was elected in 1994. The President appoints the Prime
Minister, the Cabinet, and the 23 governors. The executive branch and the
President strongly influence the judiciary, particularly in sensitive
political cases.
The police share responsibility for internal security with
a paramilitary national guard. The police operate in the capital and a few
other cities. In outlying areas, their policing duties are shared with, or
ceded to, the national guard. Both forces are under the control of the
Minister of Interior and the President. The security forces continued to be
responsible for serious human rights abuses.
Tunisia has made substantial progress towards establishing
an export-oriented market economy based on manufactured exports, tourism,
agriculture, and petroleum. The per capita gross national product for 1999 was
approximately $2,600 while real per capita income grew by 4.5 percent. Over 60
percent of citizens are in the middle class and enjoy a comfortable standard
of living. The Government reported that only 6.2 percent of citizens fell
below the poverty line, and over 80 percent of households owned their own
homes. The country has a high level of literacy, low population growth rates,
and wide distribution of basic health care. The Government devotes over 60
percent of the budget to social and development goals.
The Government's human rights performance was uneven, and
it continued to commit serious abuses. There are significant limitations on
citizens' right to change their government. The ruling RCD Party is firmly
intertwined with government institutions throughout the country, making it
extremely difficult for opposition parties to compete on a level playing
field; however, there was limited progress toward greater pluralism. The
October presidential and legislative elections marked a modest step toward
democratic development, with opposition presidential candidates allowed to run
for the first time, and opposition parties generally freer to campaign;
however, while observers agree that the outcome of the elections generally
reflected the will of the electorate, the campaign and election processes
greatly favored the ruling party and there was wide disregard for the secrecy
of the vote, in which Ben Ali won 99.44 percent of the ballots cast for
President.
Members of the security forces tortured and physically
abused prisoners and detainees. The Government asserts that police officials
who commit abuses are disciplined, but there have been no documented cases in
which security officials were disciplined for such abuse. Prison conditions
range from Spartan to poor. Security forces arbitrarily arrest and detain
persons. Lengthy pretrial detention and incommunicado detention are problems.
The Government lowered the maximum incommunicado detention period from 10 to 6
days and required authorities to notify family members at the time of arrest;
most defense lawyers claim that it is too soon to determine whether the new
provisions are being enforced. On September 22, Tunisian Human Rights League (LTDH)
vice president Khemais Ksila, who was imprisoned in 1998, received an early
parole. The judiciary is subject to executive branch control, lengthy delays
in trials are a problem, and due process rights are not always observed;
however, the Government expanded the right of appeal and established a
commission to oversee the proper administration of sentences. On November 15,
the Government announced amnesty, parole, and reduced sentences for 4,000
prisoners, 600 of whom reportedly were political prisoners, including
Islamists. The Government infringed on citizens' privacy rights, including by
intercepting mail and interfering with Internet communication. Security forces
also monitored the activities of government critics and at times harassed
them, their relatives, and associates.
The Government continued to impose significant restrictions
on freedom of speech and of the press, and journalists practice
self-censorship. The Government demonstrated a pattern of intolerance of
public criticism, using criminal investigations, judicial proceedings, and
travel controls (including denial of passports) to discourage criticism and
limit the activities of human rights activists. The Government continued to
use the mandatory prescreening of publications and control of advertising
revenue as a means to discourage newspapers and magazines from publishing
material that it considered undesirable. The Government regularly seized
editions of foreign newspapers containing articles that it considered
objectionable. However, the Government improved access to the Internet and
continued to broadcast a monthly public affairs program that permitted
citizens to debate issues with government officials. The Government restricts
freedom of assembly and association. The Government limits partially the
religious freedom of members of the Baha'i faith. The Government does not
permit proselytizing. The Government continued to restrict the freedom of
movement of government critics and their family members. The Government
subjected members of the LTDH and other human rights activists to harassment,
interrogation, property loss or damage, and denial of passports. After an
18-month suspension, the Government renewed contact with the LTDH, but refused
to approve the registration of a new human rights nongovernmental organization
(NGO), the National Council for Liberties (CNLT) and initiated judicial
proceedings against CNLT members. The Government permitted observers from
several international human rights groups to attend trials of human rights
activists. In November the Government created, within the Prime Minister's
office, a new Minister of Human Rights, Communication, and Relations with the
Chamber of Deputies. Violence against women occurs. The Government continued
to demonstrate its strong support for the rights of women and children;
however, legal discrimination against women continued to exist in certain
areas, such as property and inheritance law, which is governed by Shari'a
(Islamic law), and societal discrimination exists in areas such as private
sector employment. The Government took strong measures to reduce official
discrimination, including adding equal opportunity for women as a standard
part of its audits of all governmental entities and state-owned enterprises;
however, it did not extend such measures to the private sector.
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1 -- Respect for the Integrity of the Person,
Including Freedom From:
a. Political and Other Extrajudicial Killing
There were no reports of political killings.
According to a prison report by human rights activist
Khemais Ksila that was published by Amnesty International (AI), Tahar Jelassi
died on July 24 as a result of torture by prison guards for refusing to take
off his clothes during a routine search at Grombalia prison.
There were no developments in the case of former Islamist
Tijani Dridi, who allegedly died in police custody between August 2 and 7,
1998. The Government maintains that Dridi died on July 21 from injuries
sustained the previous day in a motorcycle collision.
There were no developments in the September 1997 case of
Ghezala Hannachi, an elderly woman who, according to human rights activists,
died after police used excessive force against her during a search of her
home. The Government maintained that Hannachi died of natural causes, did not
release the results of the prosecutor's inquiry into her death, and formally
closed the case in 1998.
b. Disappearance
There were no reports of politically motivated
disappearances.
c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment
or Punishment
The Penal Code prohibits the use of torture and other
cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; however, there are
credible reports that security services used various methods of torture to
coerce confessions from detainees. The forms of torture included electric
shock, submersion of the head in water, beatings with hands, sticks, and
police batons, cigarette burns, and food and sleep deprivation. Police also
reportedly utilized the " rotisserie " method: stripping prisoners
naked, manacling their wrists behind their ankles, and beating the prisoners
while they were suspended from a rod. A report on prison conditions by the
CNLT described other forms of torture, including the falaqa, which consists of
suspending a prisoner by the feet and severely beating the soles of the feet;
suspension of a prisoner from the metal door of his cell for hours on end
until the prisoner loses consciousness; and confinement of the prisoner to the
" cachot, " a tiny, unlit cell. Ksila and the CNLT both reported
cases in which prisoners committed self-mutilation in Tunisian prisons to
protest conditions and then, as punishment, prison authorities sutured the
prisoners' self-inflicted wounds without anesthesia and put them into
isolation or into " cachot. " The attorney of Abdelmounim Belanas
stated that his client, who was arrested on February 21 on allegations that he
belonged to the outlawed Tunisian Communist Workers Party (PCOT), was beaten
badly in detention; Belanas stated that he also was tortured while in prison
in 1995. In their July 10-11 trial, in which they were convicted of PCOT
membership, and their August 6 appeal, Lofti Hammami, Imane Darwiche, and
Henda Aroua attempted to testify about being subjected to torture in 1998
during their detention and being forced to sign confessions that they were not
permitted to read. In addition Darwiche attempted to testify that prison
guards had attempted to rape her. However, the presiding judges refused to
record references to torture and rape, saying that such statements were
irrelevant to the case. The appeals judge had Darwiche removed from the
courtroom when she persisted in trying to testify about the attempted rape.
Other defendants in the case alleged that they physically were forced to sign
confessions and statements that they were not permitted to read. In their
summary statements (which serve as the trial record), presiding judges did not
comment on these allegations (see Sections 1.d., 1.e, 2.a., 2.b., 4, and
6.a.).
According to Amnesty International and defense attorneys,
the courts routinely fail to investigate allegations of torture and
mistreatment and have accepted as evidence confessions extracted under
torture.
In a November 1998 report on Tunisia, the U.N. Committee
Against Torture recommended that the Government reduce the prearraignment
incommunicado detention period from 10 days to 48 hours, noting that most
abuses occur during incommunicado detention. On August 2, in order to address
U.N. concerns, the Government published amendments to the Penal Code, which
adopted the U.N. definition of torture and increased the maximum penalty for
those convicted of committing acts of torture from 5 to 8 years. The
Government also shortened the maximum allowable period of prearraignment
incommunicado detention from 10 to 6 days and added a requirement that the
police notify suspects' families on the day of their arrest. Although most
defense attorneys state that it is still too early to determine whether the
Government enforces the 6-day maximum detention requirement, one prominent
attorney stated that he believes that the new law usually is enforced only
with respect to common criminals, not political detainees.
In a report published in November 1998 as an alternative to
the Government's report to the U.N. Committee Against Torture, the
International Federation of Human Rights Leagues (FIDH) stated that torture
was a " blatant, grave, and systematic " practice. The report listed
at least 500 cases that occurred between 1990 and 1998, including at least 30
cases of death during torture. The majority of these cases occurred between
1990 and 1995. The FIDH reported that the total number of victims of torture
between 1990 and 1998 probably totaled several thousand, and that government
harassment discouraged victims of torture from filing complaints. The report
was prepared in conjunction with the LTDH and the Committee for the Respect of
Liberties and Human Rights in Tunisia.
Human rights advocates maintain that charges of torture and
mistreatment are difficult to substantiate because government authorities
often deny medical examinations until evidence of abuse has disappeared. For
example, in his July 10-11 and August 6 court appearances, Lotfi Hammami
attempted to testify that judicial authorities rejected repeated requests for
a medical examination after he allegedly was tortured in 1998. The Government
maintained that it investigates all complaints of torture and mistreatment
filed with the prosecutor's office and noted that alleged victims sometimes
publicly accused authorities of acts of abuse without taking the steps
required to initiate an investigation. Absent a formal complaint, the
Government may open an administrative investigation, but is unlikely to
release the results to the lawyers of affected prisoners. There have been no
documented cases in which security officials were disciplined for such abuse.
According to defense attorneys and former prisoners, prison
conditions ranged from Spartan to poor and, in some cases, did not meet
minimum international standards. Credible sources reported that overcrowding
continued to be a serious problem, with 40 to 50 prisoners typically confined
to a single 194-square-foot cell and up to 140 prisoners held in a 323
square-foot-cell. A defense attorney reported that his client was imprisoned
in a cell that contained 140 prisoners who were forced to sleep 3 to a cot.
Defense attorneys reported that prisoners in the Ninth of April prison in
Tunis were forced to share a single water and toilet facility and a single
razor with their cellmates, creating serious sanitation problems.
There were credible reports that conditions and prison
rules were more stringent for political prisoners than for the general prison
population. One credible report has alleged the existence of special cell
blocks and prisons for political prisoners, where they might be held in
solitary confinement for months on end. Another credible source reported that
high-ranking leaders of the illegal An-Nahda Islamist movement have been held
in solitary confinement since 1991. Other sources alleged that political
prisoners regularly were moved among jails throughout the country, thereby
making it more difficult for the prisoners' families to deliver food to the
prisoners. One prisoner reported that he was moved three times while serving
his 6-month sentence; another reported serving his sentence in 10 different
jails in 3 years. The CNLT report alleged that inmates are instructed to
isolate newly arrived political prisoners and are punished severely for any
contact with them. On the other hand, PCOT defendant Imane Darwiche reported
that guards incited her mentally ill cellmates to violence against Darwiche,
including choking her, spitting on her, and defecating on her personal
effects. Other prisoners, including LTDH vice president Khemais Ksila, alleged
that the authorities limited the quantity and variety of food that families of
political prisoners could bring to supplement prison fare.
There were no developments in the 1997 deaths in custody of
prisoners Ridha Khemiri and Ahmed Ouafi, who, according to human rights
activists, died because of prison authorities' negligence. The Government
denied these allegations, citing authorities' efforts to provide medical care,
but did not release the results of the autopsies that it reportedly conducted.
National High Commissioner for Human Rights Rachid Driss,
whose organization is government-funded, has conducted bimonthly, unannounced
prison inspections since 1996. Although Driss has declared that prison
conditions and prisoner hygiene were " good and improving, " details
of his inspections have not been made public.
The Government does not permit international organizations
or the media to inspect or monitor prison conditions. The LTDH announced in
its December 14 communique that the Government had granted it permission to
resume prison visits; however, it did not make any visits by year's end, and
the Government's willingness actually to allow such visits to resume remained
uncertain. The LTDH was given permission to resume visits in 1997 but
subsequently was not allowed access to prisons.
d. Arbitrary Arrest, Detention, or Exile
Arbitrary arrest and detention remain problems. The law
authorizes the police to make arrests without warrants in the cases of
suspected felons or crimes in progress. In August the Government changed the
Penal Code to reduce from 10 days to 6 the time that the Government may hold a
suspect incommunicado following arrest and prior to arraignment. Another
change requires arresting officers to inform detainees of their rights at the
time of arrest, and requires police to inform detainees' families of the
arrest at the time of the arrest. Although most defense attorneys state that
it is still too early to determine whether the Government is enforcing the
family notification requirement, one prominent attorney stated that the new
law rarely is enforced with respect to either common criminals or political
detainees. Detainees have the right to be informed of the grounds for arrest
before questioning and may request a medical examination. However, they do not
have a right to legal representation during the 6-day incommunicado detention
period. Attorneys, human rights monitors, and former detainees maintain that
the authorities illegally extend the maximum limit of prearraignment detention
by falsifying the date of arrest. Nizar Chaari, who was convicted on May 11 of
belonging to An-Nahda, was arrested on May 29, 1998, and did not appear before
a judge until June 16, 1999 (see Section 1.e.).
On May 12, the Government detained and then released within
48 hours nine labor activists who circulated a petition during the April 6-8
congress of the Tunisian Trade Union Federation (UGTT) that called for greater
pluralism within the UGTT and threatened to establish a new syndicate. Another
labor activist was detained for the same reasons for 2 days upon his return
from Paris on May 22. The Government noted that the labor activists were
detained under suspicion of threatening the public order and violating the
Publications Code, but filed no charges. In May and June the Government
detained briefly and interrogated three members of the unregistered NGO, the
National Council on Liberties, after they issued statements criticizing the
detentions of the labor activists. In July the Government indicted two of the
three, Omar Mestiri and Moncef Marzouki, for belonging to an illegal
organization (see Sections 1.e., 2.a., 2.d., and 4). In July the Government
arrested Abderraouf Chamarri and later charged him with defamation and the
spreading of false information. The Government subjected the family members of
Islamist activists to arbitrary arrest (see Sections 1.f, 2.a, 2.d, 4, and
6.a.).
Detainees have a right to be represented by counsel during
arraignment. The Government provides legal representation for indigents. At
arraignment the examining magistrate may decide to release the accused or
remand him to pretrial detention. The law permits the release of accused
persons on bail, which may be paid by a third party. In cases involving crimes
for which the sentence exceeds 5 years, or which involve national security,
pretrial detention may last an initial period of 6 months and may be extended
by court order for two additional 4-month periods. For crimes in which the
penalties may not exceed 5 years, the court may extend the initial 6-month
pretrial detention by an additional 3 months only. During this period, the
court conducts an investigation, hears arguments, and accepts evidence and
motions of both parties. In August the Government approved a law that gives
persons indicted for criminal acts the right to appeal their indictment before
the case comes to trial; previously, this right was granted in civil cases
only.
A case proceeds from investigation to a criminal court,
which sets a trial date. There is no legal limit to the length of time the
court may hold a case over for trial, nor is there a legal imperative for a
speedy hearing. Complaints of prolonged detention of persons awaiting trial
were common, and President Ben Ali publicly has encouraged judges to make
better use of release on bail and suspended sentences. Seventeen students,
professors, and labor activists who were sentenced in July for membership in
the illegal PCOT complained that their rights were violated because their case
was not tried until July 10, more than 17 months after their arrest. Defense
lawyers maintain that the Government purposely delayed the trial by preventing
4 of the 17 defendants who were in government custody from appearing in the
courtroom on May 15, the original trial date (see Sections 1.c, 1.e, 2.a.,
2.b., 4, and 6.a.). Salowa Souilem and two other persons were arrested and
imprisoned in May 1996; they were not tried until January 28. Souilem and her
codefendants were found guilty of belonging to an extremist Islamic
organization, Dawa'a Wa Tabligh, and sentenced to 2 years in prison. However,
Souilem and one other defendant were released on the day of their conviction,
with the third released at the conclusion of his sentence in May. (His time in
pretrial detention counted as part of his sentence.)
Human rights activists reported that security services
arbitrarily imposed administrative controls on former prisoners following
their release from prison. Although the Penal Code contains provisions for the
imposition of administrative controls following completion of a prison
sentence, only judges have the right to order a former prisoner to register at
a police station, and the law limits registration requirements to 5 years.
Human rights activists allege that these requirements often are unreasonable
and prevent former prisoners from being able to hold a job. One former
prisoner, Habib Soltana, a former navy lieutenant released after serving a
4-year sentence for alleged membership in An-Nahda, has been required to sign
in daily at a local police headquarters since 1995. Soltana also has been
unable to resume his career in the navy or to obtain a passport. Radhia
Aouididi, who was freed on June 4, was required as part of her original May
1998 sentence to report daily for 5 years to a police station 9 miles from her
village; after a November 25 trial, this requirement was reduced to a weekly
sign-in and notification to police if she leaves her village (see Sections
1.e., 1.f., and 2.d.). Defense attorneys reported that some clients must sign
in four or five times daily, at times that are determined only the previous
evening. When the clients arrive at the police station, they may be forced to
wait hours before signing in, making employment impossible and child care
difficult. In August the Government enacted a law proposed by president Ben
Ali on March 20 that establishes a commission designed to oversee the proper
administration of sentences. The same law also allows judges to substitute
community service for jail sentences in minor cases where the sentence would
be 6 months or less.
There are likely a sizable number of political detainees,
although there is no reliable estimate due to arbitrary government detention
practices and the lack of publicly available records of arrests.
The Constitution prohibits forced exile, and the Government
observes this prohibition.
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
The Constitution provides for an independent judiciary;
however, the executive branch and the President strongly influence the
judiciary. In practice the judicial branch is part of the Ministry of Justice
and the executive branch appoints, assigns, grants tenure to, and transfers
judges. In addition the President is head of the Supreme Council of Judges.
This situation renders judges susceptible to pressure in politically sensitive
cases.
The court system comprises the regular civil and criminal
courts, including the courts of first instance; the courts of appeal; and the
Court of Cassation, the nation's highest court; as well as the military
tribunals within the Defense Ministry.
Military tribunals try cases involving military personnel
and civilians accused of national security crimes. A military tribunal
consists of a civilian judge from the Supreme Court and four military judges.
Defendants may appeal the tribunal's verdict to the Court of Cassation.
The Code of Procedure is patterned after the French legal
system. By law the accused has the right to be present at trial, be
represented by counsel, question witnesses, and appeal verdicts. However, in
practice judges do not always observe these rights. The law permits trial in
absentia of fugitives from the law. Both the accused and the prosecutor may
appeal decisions of the lower courts. Defendants may request a different judge
if they believe that a judge is not impartial. The Court of Cassation, which
considers arguments on points of law as opposed to the facts of a case, is the
final arbiter.
Trials in the regular courts of first instance and in the
courts of appeals are open to the public. The presiding judge or panel of
judges dominates a trial, and defense attorneys have little opportunity to
participate substantively. Defense lawyers contend that the courts often fail
to grant them adequate notice of trial dates or allow them time to prepare
their cases. Some also reported that judges restricted access to evidence and
court records, requiring in some cases, for example, that all attorneys of
record examine the court record on one specified date in judges' chambers,
without allowing attorneys to copy material documents. They also complained
that the judges sometimes refused to allow them to call witnesses on their
clients' behalf, or to question key government witnesses. Lengthy delays in
trials also are a problem (see Section 1.d.).
Amnesty International and defense attorneys report that
courts routinely fail to investigate allegations of torture and mistreatment,
and have accepted as evidence confessions extracted under torture (see Section
1.c.). Defense lawyers and human rights activists complain that the length of
court sessions sometimes prevents reasoned deliberation. The July 10-11 trial
of human rights lawyer Radhia Nasraoui, 17 codefendants who were in government
custody, and 3 defendants who were in hiding and tried in absentia, continued
for 20 straight hours with only short recesses (see Sections 1.c, 1.d, 2.a.,
2.b., 4, and 6.a.).
There is no definitive information on the number of
political prisoners. Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported that there might be
hundreds of political prisoners, convicted and imprisoned for membership in
the Islamist group An-Nahda and the Communist Workers Party, for disseminating
information produced by these banned organizations, and for aiding relatives
of convicted members. Reliable sources estimate that between 1,200 and 2,000
political prisoners were held in the prisons at the beginning of the year. The
Government often releases prisoners on major national holidays, such as
Independence Day or the anniversary of President Ben Ali's accession to power
on November 7, 1987. On November 5, the Government announced the release and
pardon of thousands of prisoners. Newspapers stated that 4,000 prisoners
received either a reduction in their sentences or were released (some
conditionally). Of these 4,000, government sources stated that 2,600 were
released from prison. Reliable human rights activists and lawyers estimated
that approximately 600 political prisoners were included in those released,
and government officials confirmed that some Islamists were released.
Therefore, the number of political prisoners detained at year's end was
estimated to be between 600 and 1,400.
Khemais Ksila, the vice president of the LTDH who was
jailed in 1998 for defamation, was released on September 22 after receiving an
early parole (see Sections 2.a., 2.d., and 4). However, the Government does
not provide details on the numbers or types of prisoners released. Nizar
Chaari, who was convicted on May 11 of belonging to An-Nahda, was released on
June 4. Radhia Aouididi, Saida Charbti, and Rachida Ben Salem were released on
June 4; Aoudidi's fiancee (who has refugee status in France), Ben Salem's
husband (who has refugee status in Holland), and Charbti's husband are accused
of belonging to An-Nahda (see Section 2.d.). On February 16, Mohamed Aouididi
(brother of Radhia Aouididi) and Mohamed Amri (brother of Radhia's fiancee)
were released from prison. Radhia Aouididi, her mother Omssaad, her brother
Mohammed, and Mohammed Amri were acquitted on November 25 for lack of evidence
on charges of association with criminal elements. All defendants were released
from requirements to sign in daily at a police station. Radhia Aouididi's
requirement from her prior conviction was reduced to a weekly sign-in and
notification to police if she leaves her village (see Section 1.d., 1.f., and
2.d.). Salwa Souilem was released on January 28, the day of her conviction for
belonging to an outlawed Islamic group, 4 months before the end of her
sentence (see Sections 1.d and 1.f.).
f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or
Correspondence
The authorities infringed on citizens' privacy rights. The
Constitution provides for the inviolability of the person, the home, and for
the privacy of correspondence, " except in exceptional cases defined by
law. " The law requires that the police have warrants to conduct
searches; however, police sometimes ignore the requirement if authorities
consider that state security is at stake or that a crime is in progress. Human
rights lawyer Radhia Nasraoui claimed that 3 houses of her family members were
broken into and ransacked by a group of approximately 50 security officials on
September 3, and that another 2 houses of relatives were ransacked on
September 5. Plainclothes police officers searched the premises without
presenting either a search warrant or any form of identification. According to
Nasraoui, family members who voiced objections during the search were struck
and told that they had no choice but to submit to the search. The Government
stated that security forces were searching for Nasraoui's husband, Hamma
Hammami, who was convicted in absentia in July of membership in the outlawed
Communist Workers' Party but who has been in hiding since February 1998 (see
Sections 2.a and 4.).
Authorities may invoke state security interests to justify
telephone surveillance. There were numerous reports of government interception
of facsimile and computer-transmitted communications. The law does not
explicitly authorize these activities, although the Government has stated that
the Code of Criminal Procedure implicitly gives investigating magistrates such
authority. Many political activists experience frequent and sometimes extended
interruptions of residential and business telephone and facsimile services.
Human rights activists accuse the Government of using the 1998 Postal Code,
with its broad but undefined prohibition against mail that threatens the
public order, to interfere with their mail and interrupt the delivery of
foreign publications. Local phone, facsimile, and copy shops require persons
to turn over their identification cards when requesting to send facsimiles.
Lawyers and activists stated that the Government has increased its practice of
cutting off telephone service to activists; telephone service to the offices,
homes, and relatives of prominent human rights lawyers and other activists
frequently was cut, sometimes for long periods.
The security services monitor the activities of political
critics, and sometimes harass, follow, question, or otherwise intimidate their
relatives and associates. Journalist Taoufik Ben Brik alleged that
plainclothes policemen beat him on the street near his house on May 20 and
then searched his house without a warrant; the Government denies any
involvement and claims that Ben Brik did not cooperate in police attempts to
investigate the beating (see Sections 1.d, 2.a, and 4.). Police place
journalists who write articles critical of the Government, or who are active
in human rights organizations, under surveillance (see Section 2.a.). Human
rights activists and lawyers also reported that they were under police
surveillance. Lawyer Radhia Nasraoui complained that police frequently follow
and intimidate her children, and other human rights activists stated that the
surveillance of Nasraoui's family, in-laws, and office increased after
Nasraoui's July conviction for aiding and abetting an illegal organization
(see Sections 2.a. and 4). LTDH vice president Khemais Ksila reported that he
continued to be subjected to government surveillance and harassment since his
release in September. Ksila's telephone service has been cut, and he reported
that his mail was monitored and only bills have been delivered. On December
17, Ksila's car was rammed by the police surveillance car that was following
him, causing an accident in which the passenger side of his car was damaged
badly. In accordance with the law for prisoners released on parole, Ksila had
no passport at year's end; his passport was seized in 1996. He also has been
unable to work since 1996. Sihem Bensidrine, publisher and wife of CNLT
secretary general Omar Mestiri, reported that since April her telephone
service was cut, her home was under daily surveillance, her children routinely
were followed and questioned by security police, and her publishing house was
burglarized and ransacked three times, including on December 30, when her
computer system and the CD-ROM archives of her not-yet-published philosophy
manuscripts were stolen.
Human rights activists alleged that the Government
subjected the family members of Islamist activists to arbitrary arrest,
reportedly utilizing charges of " association with criminal elements
" to punish family members for crimes committed by the activists. Radhia
Aouididi, her mother Omssaad, her brother Mohammed, and Mohammed Amri were
acquitted for lack of evidence on November 25 of charges of association with
criminal elements. All defendants were released from requirements to sign in
daily at a police station. Radhia Aouididi's requirement from her prior
conviction was reduced to a weekly sign-in and notification to police if she
leaves her village (see Sections 1.d., 1.e., and 2.d.). Mohamed Amri, who was
arrested on October 29, 1998 and freed on February 16, is the brother of
political refugee and accused An-Nahda activist Ahmed Amri. Radhia Aouididi,
who was arrested in 1996 for attempting to leave the country on a false
passport after her passport application was denied, and who was released from
prison on June 4, is the fiancee of Ahmed Amri. Mohamed Aouididi had been
arrested on October 30, 1998; he was freed on February 16. Omssaad Aouididi
had been arrested on October 30, 1998 and was released the same day. Abdel
Momen Amri, the father of Ahmed Amri, also was arrested on October 30, 1998
and released the same day; he was not summoned for the October 25 trial (see
Section 1.d.).
Human rights activists also alleged that the relatives of
Islamist activists who are in jail or living abroad were subjected to police
surveillance and mandatory visits to police stations to report their contact
with relatives. The Government maintained that the Islamists' relatives were
members or associates of the outlawed An-Nahda movement and that they were
correctly subjected to legitimate laws prohibiting membership in or
association with that organization. The Government also reportedly refused to
issue passports to the family members of some human rights activists.
Human rights activists allege that security services
arbitrarily imposed administrative controls on prisoners following their
release from prison (see Section 1.d.).
Police presence is heavy throughout the country and traffic
officers routinely stop motorists for no apparent reason to examine their
personal identification and vehicular documents. The Government regularly
prohibited the distribution of some foreign publications (see Section 2.a.).
The security services often question citizens seen talking with foreign
visitors or residents, particularly visiting international human rights
monitors and journalists.
Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
a. Freedom of Speech and Press
The Constitution provides for freedom of expression and of
the press; however, in practice, the Government restricts freedom of speech
and of the press and relies upon direct and indirect methods to restrict press
freedom and encourage a high degree of self-censorship. The Government also
used the Press Code, which contains broad provisions prohibiting subversion
and defamation, to prosecute individuals who expressed dissenting opinions. In
a November 15 speech, President Ben Ali called for an end to self-censorship
by journalists and a change in the Press Code to eliminate prison sentences as
penalties for some offenses; however, he did not identify specifically what
changes would be made and took no steps to change the code by year's end. Ben
Ali also announced the creation of the position of Minister of Human Rights,
Communication, and Relations with the Chamber of Deputies. Dali Jazi, a
founding member of the LTDH, was appointed to the position, which is within
the Prime Minister's office.
In July the Government jailed and prosecuted Abderraouf
Chamarri (brother of self-exiled human rights activist Khemais Chamarri) on
charges of defamation and dissemination of false information for a joke that
Chamarri denied making, which linked a former minister to corruption; the
sentence was upheld on appeal on August 10. Chamarri received a pardon on
August 30 after he wrote a personal plea to the President citing health
problems (see Section 1.d.). In June newspaper critic and composer Mohamed
Gharfi was found guilty and fined for a 1998 series of five articles
criticizing the organization of the annual Carthage Cultural Festival.
Gharfi's newspaper publisher also was found guilty, and both verdicts were
upheld on appeal. Ten labor union activists who were detained for 48 hours in
May and then released without charges, allegedly were threatened with
prosecution under the Publications Code after they distributed a petition
calling for greater democracy within the trade union confederation without
having submitted advance copies to the Government (see Sections 1.d. and
6.a.). The 20 students, professors, and labor activists (including 3 fugitives
tried in absentia), who originally were arrested in February and March 1998
after criticizing the Government and its university policies, were convicted
in July of membership in the outlawed PCOT (see Sections 1.c., 1.d., 1.e.,
2.b., 4, and 6.a.).
LTDH vice president Khemais Ksila, who was arrested in
September 1997 and convicted in February 1998 on charges of defamation of the
public order, dissemination of false information, and inciting the public to
violence, was released on September 22 after receiving an early parole (see
Sections 1.e., 2.d., and 4). After releasing communiques criticizing the
Government in the name of the unregistered National Council for Liberties, two
CNLT members, Omar Mestiri and Moncef Marzouki, were indicted in July for
belonging to an illegal organization (see Sections 1.d., 2.d., and 4.). Moncef
Marzouki also was arrested in November and December and charged with
defamation, belonging to an unrecognized organization, causing a public
disturbance, and dissemination of false information for publishing and
distributing two communiques on behalf of the CNLT. The criminal investigation
of ousted Social Democratic Movement (MDS) president Mohamed Moaada, which
opened in December 1997, is ongoing. The Government did not react to several
communiques issued by Moaada criticizing the Government for human rights
violations; however, on November 17, Moaada was placed under house arrest.
Moaada was released from house arrest on December 14 after he began a hunger
strike on November 22. His house reportedly is no longer under security police
surveillance, his telephone service was restored, and he was permitted to
receive visitors again. Several journalists from Al-Fajr, the publication
associated with the outlawed An-Nahda movement, remain in jail serving
sentences that were given out in the early 1990's. The Government maintains
that the arrests, indictments, and convictions were carried out in full
accordance with the law.
Although several independent newspapers and
magazines--including two opposition party journals--exist, the Government
relies upon direct and indirect methods to restrict press freedom and
encourage a high degree of self-censorship. Primary among these methods is
" depot legal, " the requirement that printers and publishers
provide copies of all publications to the Chief Prosecutor, Ministry of
Interior, and Ministry of Culture prior to distribution. In July after
reviewing the requisite advance copy, the Government, without explaining its
position, refused to allow the Tunisian Association of Young Lawyers to
distribute its internal bulletin celebrating the centenary of the Tunisian Bar
Association. The Government has refused to allow Amnesty International's
Tunisia chapter to distribute 4,000 textbooks on human rights written for high
school students.
Similarly, distributors must deposit copies of publications
printed abroad with the Chief Prosecutor and various ministries prior to their
public release. While publishers need not wait for an authorization, they must
obtain a receipt of deposit before distribution. On occasion such receipts
reportedly are withheld, sometimes indefinitely. Without a receipt,
publications may not be distributed legally. The Press Code contains broad
provisions prohibiting subversion and defamation, neither of which is defined
clearly. The code stipulates fines and confiscation for failure to comply with
these provisions. The Government routinely utilized this method to prevent
distribution of editions of foreign newspapers and magazines that contained
articles critical of the country. For example, editions of Le Monde,
Liberation, and Al-Hayat, were embargoed several times throughout the year,
and the French newspaper La Croix is, in effect, permanently banned. On
October 21, the Government banned Le Monde, Le Canard Enchaine, L'Observateur,
Le Point, Liberation, and Le Figaro in Tunis for their critical coverage of
the presidential and legislative elections. Frankfurther Allgemeiner Zeitung
and the Financial Times also were banned periodically since the October 24
elections. The Government also reportedly withheld " depot legal "
to remove from circulation books that it deemed critical of the Government. A
book published by French journalist Jean Daniel was removed from bookstore
shelves on April 25 on the grounds that the distributor had not complied with
the depot legal requirement; at the same time, a photograph exhibit organized
by Daniel's wife Michele was canceled and the director of the cultural center
that organized the show was dismissed. The Government stated that the cultural
center director was not dismissed arbitrarily but had reached retirement age.
In addition the Government provided official texts on major domestic and
international events and reportedly reprimanded publishers and editors for
failing to publish these statements.
The Government also relies on indirect methods, such as
newsprint subsidies and control of public advertising revenues, to encourage
self-censorship in the media. There were credible reports that the Government
withheld advertising orders, a vital source of revenues, from publications
that published articles that the Government deemed offensive.
The Government exerted further control over the media by
threatening to impose restrictions on journalists, such as refusing permission
to travel abroad, withholding press credentials, and questioning and imposing
police surveillance on journalists who wrote articles critical of the
Government. Members of the security services also reportedly questioned
journalists on the nature of press conferences and other public functions
hosted by foreigners that they attended. Journalist Taoufik Ben Brik had his
passport seized in April, was beaten, allegedly by plainclothes police, on May
20, and subsequently was detained and interrogated; his car also was
vandalized in broad daylight. These events all occurred after he published
articles critical of the Government in the French newspaper La Croix (see
Sections 1.d., 1.f., 2.a., and 4.). Other journalists who were active in human
rights organizations reported that they were under police surveillance for
weeks at a time. Visiting foreign journalists sometimes complain of being
followed by security officials.
On May 3, for the second year in a row, the Committee to
Protect Journalists named President Ben Ali as one of its " 10 worst
enemies of the press. " In July Reporters Sans Frontieres released a
paper entitled " Censorship: A Keystone of the Ben Ali Regime, "
which states that " press freedom is nonexistent in Tunisia. " Both
reports focused on the presence of a restrictive atmosphere that leads to
self-censorship and control exercised through advertising revenues. The
Tunisian Newspaper Association remained expelled from the World Association of
Newspapers (WAN). The WAN expelled the Association in 1997 for its failure to
oppose repression of freedom of the press.
The Government owns and operates the Tunisian Radio and
Television Establishment (ERTT). The ERTT's coverage of government news is
taken directly from the official news agency, TAP. In May 1998, the ERTT began
broadcasting a live public debate program entitled " Face to Face, "
which gave ordinary citizens the opportunity to debate public affairs issues
with government officials. Human rights activists described the program as
progress toward greater freedom of expression. There are several
government-owned regional radio stations and one national television channel.
Bilateral agreements with France and Italy permit citizens to receive the
French television channel France 2 and the Italian Rai-Uno. However, the
Government stopped the broadcast of France 2 in October because of its
critical coverage of the elections. The Government later announced plans to
terminate France 2 service in Tunisia permanently. It stated that the
termination was part of a long-term plan to provide more broadcast time to
Tunisian programming. Recent estimates put the number of satellite dishes in
the country at well over 100,000. After blocking sales for several years, the
Government instituted regulations in 1996 to govern their sale and
installation.
The Government encouraged greater use of the Internet,
lowered Internet user fees and telephone connection fees in both 1998 and
1999, and abolished customs duties on computers. By September 1, the
Government reported that 12,000 users were connected to the Internet (many of
which were institutions, thus suggesting a higher number of individuals with
Internet access), approximately double the number a year earlier. The
Government used the Internet widely, with most government ministries and
agencies posting information on readily accessible web sites. With a goal of
100,000 Internet users by 2001, the Government actively is connecting schools
and universities to the Internet. However, web sites containing information
critical of the Government posted by international NGO's and foreign
governments frequently are blocked, including a report on Internet use in
Tunisia by Human Rights Watch. The only two Internet service providers in
Tunisia remain under the control of the Tunisian Internet Agency, which was
created in 1996 and which regularly must provide lists of subscribers to the
Government. Human rights activists allege that the Agency regularly interferes
with and intercepts their Internet communications. The Press Code, including
the requirement that advance copies of publications be provided to the
Government, applies to information shared on the Internet (see Section 4).
The Government limits academic freedom. Like journalists,
university professors indicated that they sometimes practiced self-censorship
by avoiding classroom criticism of the Government or statements supportive of
the An-Nahda movement. Professors alleged that the Government utilized the
threat of tax audits, control over university positions, and strict publishing
rules to encourage self-censorship. The presence of police on campuses also
discouraged dissent. A 1996 regulation requires professors to inform the
Ministry of Higher Education in advance of any seminars, including the list of
participants and subjects to be addressed. Copies of papers to be presented in
university settings or seminars must be provided to the Ministry in advance.
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
The Constitution provides for freedom of assembly; however,
the Government imposes some restrictions on this right. Groups that wish to
hold a public meeting, rally, or march must obtain a permit from the Ministry
of Interior by applying no later than 3 days in advance of the proposed event,
and submitting the list of participants. The authorities routinely approve
such permits for groups that support government positions, but refuse
permission for groups that express dissenting views. Several independent
NGO's, including the LTDH, the ATFD, and the National Student Union (UGET)
received permission to hold a public meeting in December at the Africa
Meridien hotel in commemoration of the 51st anniversary of the signing of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The first general meeting of human
rights activists in the country in several years was attended by a
standing-room-only crowd, with over 500 attendees representing groups from all
over the country. After prohibiting the Tunisia chapter of Amnesty
International from holding public meetings in September and December 1998, the
Government permitted the chapter to hold a public meeting in Tunis in May.
However, the Government prohibited branch offices from holding meetings in
public space and denied AI permission to hold a public meeting on November 26
to celebrate Mahmoud Romdhane's reelection to the International Executive
Committee of AI (see Section 4). On December 4, the police forcibly broke up a
peaceful march that was organized by the UGTT in commemoration of the
anniversary of the death of an early trade union activist. The Government
routinely granted permits to opposition political parties to conduct campaign
rallies and other activities, including in public buildings, during the
October election campaigns (see Section 3).
Although the Constitution provides for freedom of
association, the Government restricts this right by barring membership in
political parties organized by religion, race, or region. On these grounds,
the Government prosecutes members of the Islamist movement An-Nahda. Human
rights activists alleged that the Government extended its prosecution of
Islamist activists to include family members who were not politically active
(see sections 1.d. and 1.f.). A criminal investigation against former MDS
opposition party leader Mohamed Moaada remained open, after he allegedly met
with An-Nahda leaders in Europe in 1997 (see Section 2.a.).
In January the Government pardoned and released seven
students who were arrested in December 1998 for their participation in public
rallies organized by the UGET.
The Government bans organizations that threaten disruption
of the public order and uses this proscription to prosecute members of the
PCOT. In July the courts convicted 17 students, professors, and labor
activists of membership in the PCOT; given sentences ranging from 16 months to
3 years, 11 of those convicted were released in August because it was
determined that their pretrial detention counted as part of their sentences.
PCOT leader Hamma Hammami and two other fugitives, in hiding since February
1998, were convicted in absentia and given prison sentences of 9 years and 4
months. Human rights lawyer (and wife of Hammami) Radhia Nasraoui, indicted in
the same case but whose charges were reduced to misdemeanors on April 12, was
given a 6-month suspended sentence for aiding and abetting an illegal
organization (see Sections 1.c, 1.d., 1.e, 2.a., 4, and 6.e.). AI reported
that of the remaining six students, five were released on November 4 as part
of Ben Ali's presidential pardon (see Section 1.e.).
c. Freedom of Religion
The Constitution establishes Islam as the state religion
and provides for the free exercise of other religions that do not disturb the
public order, and the Government generally respects this right; however, it
does not permit proselytizing and partially limits the religious freedom of
Baha'is. The Government controls mosques and pays the salaries of prayer
leaders. The 1988 Law on Mosques provides that only personnel appointed by the
Government may lead activities in the mosques.
The Government regards the Baha'i faith as a heretical sect
of Islam and permits its 150 adherents to practice their faith only in
private. The Government reportedly pressures Baha'is to eschew organized
religious activities.
With 1,800 adherents, the Jewish community is the country's
largest indigenous religious minority. The Government ensures the Jewish
community freedom of worship and pays the salary of the Grand Rabbi. The
Government permits the Jewish community to operate private religious schools
and allows Jewish children on the island of Jerba to split their academic day
between secular public schools and private religious schools. The Government
also encouraged Jewish emigres to return for the annual Jewish pilgrimage to
the historic El-Ghriba synagogue on the island of Jerba.
The nominal Christian community--composed of foreign
temporary and permanent residents and a small group of native-born citizens of
both European and Arab origin--numbers approximately 20,000 and is dispersed
throughout the country. According to church leaders, the practicing Christian
population numbers approximately 2,000 and includes an estimated 200
native-born ethnic Arab citizens who have converted to Christianity. In
general, the Government does not permit Christian groups to establish new
churches.
The Government views proselytizing as an act against the
public order. Authorities ask foreigners suspected of proselytizing to depart
the country and do not permit them to return. There were no reported cases of
official action against persons suspected of proselytizing.
d. Freedom of Movement Within the Country, Foreign Travel,
Emigration, and Repatriation
The Constitution provides for these rights, and persons are
free to change their place of residence or work at will; however, in practice
the Government restricts the freedom of movement and foreign travel of those
critical of it.
Amendments to the passport law in October 1998 transferred
power for canceling passports from the Ministry of Interior to the courts;
however, the amended law contains broad provisions that permit passport
seizure on undefined national security grounds and deny citizens the right
either to present their case against seizure or to appeal the judges'
decision. The Ministry of Interior must submit requests to seize or withhold a
citizen's passport through the Public Prosecutor to the courts.
Human rights monitors complain that the Government
arbitrarily withholds passports from citizens. In July human rights activists
circulated a list of 26 defense lawyers whose passports the authorities
seized. Although throughout the year the Government returned passports to
several prominent activists and lawyers, it continued to withhold the
passports of many other citizens, including Moncef Marzouki, Mustapha Ben
Jaafar, and Siheme Ben Sedrine (see Section 4). On March 26, the passport of
Fatma Ksila, wife of jailed LTDH vice president Khemais Ksila, was stolen in
what she believes was a political move designed to prevent her travel later
that day to Geneva to meet with U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary
Robinson. The Government, citing laws designed to prevent the trafficking of
stolen passports, stated that Ksila, like other citizens, legally may reapply
for a passport 1 year from the date the passport was stolen. Also during
March, the Government prohibited Ksila's son Zaid from traveling to Cairo to
receive a human rights award in the name of his father; the Government
reported that, because Zaid was a minor, he needed explicit permission from
his father to leave the country. The mother of human rights lawyer Radhia
Nasraoui was denied permission to renew her passport. In accordance with the
law concerning prisoners released on parole, the Government continues to
withhold the passport of Khemais Ksila since his September 22 release (see
Section 1.f.). According to reliable sources, some political dissenters in
self-imposed exile have been prevented from obtaining or renewing their
passports in order to return to Tunisia. However, former Prime Minister
Mohammed Mzali and former Minister of Education and the Economy Achmed Ben
Sada, who both have been in self-exile for many years, recently had their
passports reinstated.
Human rights groups reported that the Government continued
to withhold the passports of the family members of Islamist activists who live
abroad. Radhia Aouididi was freed on June 4, 5 months before the expiration of
her 3-year prison term on a conviction of association with An-Nahda and
November 1996 use of a false passport (after the Government refused to issue
her a passport). Aouididi was informed after her November 25 acquittal that
she would be issued a passport if she could provide a judge's decision in her
trial; however, she claimed that the court refused her access to copies of the
November 25 decision (see Sections 1.d., 1.e., and 1.f.). Aoudidi's fiance
Ahmed Amri, who lives abroad, is accused of membership in An-Nahda. After
being released on June 4, Rachida Ben Salem and Saida Charbti, both of whose
husbands are political refugees in Europe accused of membership in An-Nahda,
requested passports; the Government denied the requests (see Sections 1.d.,
1.e., and 1.f.).
The Government restricts internal travel during criminal
investigations. Human rights lawyer Radhia Nasraoui was confined to the
greater Tunis area from March 1998 until these restrictions were lifted with
her conviction on charges of aiding an illegal organization in July; on
February 11, Nasraoui was convicted and given a suspended sentence for
violating her travel restrictions when she traveled without authorization to
her mother-in-law's funeral in Sfax (see Sections 1.c., 1.d., 1.e., 2.a., and
4). Council for National Liberties member Omar Mestiri remains confined to
Tunis pending the outcome of a criminal trial, which prevents him from
reaching his place of employment outside the city limits (see Sections 1.d,
1.e, 2.a, and 4).
Police routinely stop motorists for no apparent reason to
examine their personal identification and vehicular documents (see Section
1.f.).
The Government cooperates with the office of the United
Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in assisting refugees. The
Government acknowledged the UNHCR's determination of refugee status that was
accorded to 200 individuals during the year. Approximately 100 cases await
determination by the UNHCR. The Government provides first asylum for refugees
based on UNHCR recommendations. There is no pattern of abuse of refugees.
Although a few refugees were deported during the year, none were forced to
return to countries where they feared persecution.
Section 3 -- Respect for Political Rights: The Right of
Citizens to Change Their Government
The Constitution provides that the citizenry shall elect
the President and members of the legislature for 5-year terms; however, there
still are some significant limitations on citizens' right to change their
government. In October President Ben Ali was reelected for a third 5-year term
in the country's first multiparty presidential elections in October, winning
99.44 percent of the vote. According to the Constitution, this is to be his
last term in office. The ruling RCD party won all 148 directly elected seats
in the legislative elections. Observers agree that the outcome of the
presidential and legislative elections generally reflect the will of the
electorate; however, the campaign and election processes greatly favored the
ruling party and there was widespread disregard for the secrecy of the vote.
The ruling RCD party so dominates all levels of political activity that
credible electoral challenges have been extremely difficult. Nonetheless, the
results also reflect the general satisfaction of the vast majority with
President Ben Ali's rule, which derives in large part from his success in
promoting economic and social well-being. Opposition presidential candidates
were allowed to run for the first time and opposition parties were able to
campaign freely within the limits dictated by the Government; however, given
the overwhelming dominance of the RCD, the playing field for the elections was
not level. A presidentially appointed independent election monitoring group
presented a confidential report to the President on the election process,
which reportedly uncovered numerous irregularities alleged by opposition
parties. President Ben Ali subsequently announced, during his November 15
inauguration ceremony, that he would propose a law to require voters to enter
the voting booth and take copies of all party ballots (not just the ballot
with ruling-party candidates) in order to preserve the secrecy of the vote.
The RCD party and its direct predecessor parties have
controlled the political arena since independence in 1956. The RCD dominates
the Cabinet, the Chamber of Deputies, and regional and local governments. The
President appoints the Cabinet and the 23 governors. The Government and the
party are integrated closely; the President of the Republic is also the
president of the party, and the party's secretary general holds the rank of
minister.
The Government amended the Constitution and Electoral Code
in July to allow party presidents who have been in office for at least 5 years
and whose parties were represented in the 1994 to 1999 Chamber of Deputies
(and who met other requirements such as age and nationality) to run in the
October presidential elections. These criteria were a one-time alternative to
the more restrictive standing requirement that candidates for president must
receive the endorsement of 30 sitting deputies or municipal council presidents
to be eligible to run, and paved the way for the first multiparty presidential
elections, as Mohamed Belhaj Amor, secretary general of the Popular Unity
Front (PUP), and Abderrahman Tlili, secretary general of the Union of
Democratic Unionists party (UDU), entered the race. Both candidates
acknowledged flaws in the Electoral Code and criticized the fact that the
narrowly written criteria made only two persons eligible to run against Ben
Ali. At the same time, they stated that they wanted to advance pluralism by
seizing the opportunity to run. However, after the elections, there were
opposition complaints that, despite some progress in liberalizing the
electoral process, problems remained, especially with regard to protection of
the secrecy of the ballot and the accuracy of the vote totals.
The 182-seat Chamber of Deputies does not function as a
counterweight to the executive branch; rather, it serves as an arena in which
the executive's legislative proposals are debated prior to virtually automatic
approval. Debate within the Chamber is often lively and government ministers
are summoned to respond to deputies' questions, although heated exchanges
critical of government policy are not reported fully in the press. Regardless
of the debate, the Chamber has a history of approving all government
proposals. The Chamber that emerged from the October parliamentary elections
is more pluralistic than the Chamber in place from 1994 to 1999, as October
1998 changes in the Electoral Code reserved 20 percent of the seats for the
opposition parties, distributed on a proportional basis to those parties that
did not win directly elected district seats. Now, 5 opposition parties hold 34
of 182 seats, or nearly 19 percent, compared with 4 opposition parties with 19
of 163 seats, or 12 percent, in the previous Parliament. The remaining 81
percent of the seats were contested in winner-take-all, multiseat district
races, in which the ruling party won all 148 directly elected seats, up from
144 in the last Parliament. Opposition politicians recognized that the
electoral changes ensured them more seats than they could have won in a
popular election. However, they also argue that the winner-take-all, multiseat
district system permanently favors the RCD and essentially freezes the
opposition at the 20 percent level.
All six legally recognized opposition parties fielded
parliamentary candidates in the October elections. The Government provided
public financing to political parties, as called for in legislation adopted in
1997. Under the legislation, each party represented in the Chamber of Deputies
received an annual public subsidy of approximately $54,000 (60,000 dinars),
plus an additional payment of $4,500 (5,000 dinars) per deputy. The Government
also provided campaign financing that corresponded to the number of district
lists that each party presented. Opposition politicians argued that the
subsidy system reinforces the favored position of the ruling party because its
dominance in the Parliament means that it receives the great majority of the
government funding. Moreover, with funding based on seats in Parliament, the
opposition parties had no interest in forming coalitions against the RCD, but
concentrated instead on competing with each other for the largest possible
share of the 20 percent of seats reserved for the opposition. During the
elections, opposition parties found independent fund raising impossible, and
those that published newspapers or magazines faced difficulties in obtaining
paid advertisers.
Women participate in politics, but they are
underrepresented in senior government positions. Twenty-one of the 182
Deputies elected in October are women, up from 13 of 163 deputies in the
previous Chamber. The number of women in the Cabinet increased from one to
four after April and November cabinet changes, with two women being appointed
full ministers (the Minister of Environment and Land Management and the
Minister for Women and Family Affairs) and two appointed junior ministers (the
Secretary of State for Housing and the Secretary of State for Public Health).
Section 4 -- Governmental Attitude Regarding International
and Nongovernmental Investigation of Alleged Violations of Human Rights
The Tunisian Human Rights League is the most active
independent advocacy organization, with branches in many parts of the country.
The organization receives and researches complaints and protests individual
and systemic abuses. After the league published a communique welcoming the
human rights initiatives announced in President Ben Ali's March 20
independence day speech, then Minister of Interior Ali Chaouch met with LTDH
president Taoufik Bouderbala on April 1, the first official meeting between
the League and the Government since the Government broke off dialog in August
1997. At that time, the Government had accused the LTDH of prompting members
of the International Human Rights Federation to give inaccurate testimony
regarding Tunisia before the U.N. Human Rights Commission. While pleased with
the renewed contact, LTDH officials reported that the Government had not
provided any written responses to LTDH inquiries since 1994. As a result of
the April 1 meeting, the Government returned the passports of several lawyers
whose cases the LTDH raised with the Government. LTDH representatives also
reported that the Government acceded to league requests for a thorough medical
check-up of then-jailed LTDH vice president Khemais Ksila (who was released in
September) and that a jailed university student be allowed a face-to-face
meeting with her father. LTDH president Bouderbala reported that informal
contacts between the LTDH and the Government subsequently continued, and that
the Government addressed some league complaints about postimprisonment
administration controls by reducing the frequency of police station sign-ins
by some former prisoners. In June the Government provided the LTDH with a
grant of $23,000 (25,000 dinars), its first direct subsidy for general LTDH
operations in the League's history.
Although the Government permitted the League to hold
meetings and a rally in its offices, it continued to place significant
obstacles in the way of the League's effective operation. LTDH members and
other human rights activists reported government harassment, interrogation,
property loss or damage, unauthorized home entry, and denial of passports.
Local newspapers refused to publish LTDH communiques. After requests for
permission to hold meetings in public spaces were denied in 1997 and 1998, the
LTDH was able to secure a hotel venue for a December 14 meeting held in
conjunction with the Young Lawyers Association, the ATDF, the Tunisian chapter
of Amnesty International, and the UGET. The meeting featured speakers
commenting on the 51st anniversary of the signing of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights. This first general meeting of human rights activists in
several years was attended by over 500 persons representing groups from all
over the country.
LTDH vice president Khemais Ksila, convicted in February
1998 on defamation charges, was released on September 22 (see Sections 1.e.,
2.a., and 2.d.). Although the Government claims that an investigation is
ongoing, there were no developments regarding the February 12, 1998 ransacking
and burglary of the law office of human rights activist Radhia Nasraoui, which
human rights activists believe the security services carried out. In a case
that human rights activists believe was motivated by authorities' desire to
retaliate for her willingness to defend unpopular clients, Nasraoui was
convicted in July and given a 6-month suspended sentence for aiding and
abetting the outlawed Communist Workers Party (see Sections 1.c., 1.d, 1.e,
2.b., 4, and 6).
On December 15, 1998, several activists applied to the
Ministry of Interior to register a new human rights organization, the Tunisian
National Council for Liberties. On March 2, the Government issued its refusal
to register the CNLT as an NGO, commenting (without providing details) that
the organization did not comply with the law. The CNLT's founders filed an
administrative appeal asking for reconsideration, which the Government has not
yet acted upon. Although not recognized by the Government, the CNLT issued
statements criticizing government human rights practices. Government officials
stated that, in publishing communiques in the name of an unregistered NGO,
CNLT members violated the Publications Code (which requires that advance
copies be provided to the Government), belonged to an illegal organization,
and threatened public order. The Government opened a criminal investigation of
the head of the Tunisian Association of Young Lawyers for receiving CNLT
members in his office. The Government detained and interrogated two CNLT
members, Omar Mestiri and Moncef Marzouki, in May, and a third member in June.
In July a court indicted both Mestiri and Marzouki on charges of belonging to
an illegal organization, violating the Publications Code, and spreading false
information; both are currently out of prison awaiting trial. Marzouki and
CNLT member Mustapha Ben Jaafar, both doctors, allege that the Government
prohibits them from treating patients in retaliation for their human rights
activism. Marzouki also was indicted in November and December and charged with
defamation, belonging to an unrecognized organization, public disturbance, and
dissemination of false information for publishing and distributing two
communiques critical of the Government's harassment of Omar Mestiri, his wife,
Sihem Bensedrine, and former directors of MDS Mohamed Moaada and Ahmed
Khaskoussi. Marzouki's family also claims to have suffered from Marzouki's
activism, and his brother Ali Bedoui was arrested in January and given a
6-month prison sentence. The Government stated that Bedoui was arrested for
failing to fulfill the requirement of a previous conviction that he report
daily to the police station. Many CNLT members were unable to obtain passports
(see Sections 1.d., 1.e., 2.a., and 2.d.).
The Arab Institute for Human Rights, headquartered in
Tunis, was founded in 1989 by the LTDH, the Arab Organization for Human
Rights, and the Union of Arab lawyers. It is an information, rather than an
advocacy, organization, and the Government supports its activities.
Amnesty International continued to maintain a Tunisian
chapter. Its members complained that the Tunis office suffered repeated loss
of telephone and facsimile service. Until June telephone information service
provided an incorrect number to those asking for AI's telephone number;
persons who called this number reportedly then were questioned by Ministry of
Interior officials. Persons who were considering joining AI's Tunisia chapter
report being discouraged actively from doing so by security officials. AI
officials reported that they were under periodic police surveillance. The
Government continued to deny entry to a London-based AI researcher responsible
for Tunisian affairs, claiming that she has an anti-Tunisia bias. The
Government refused to allow the Tunisia chapter of AI to distribute 4,000
books on human rights education for high school students. The Government
permitted AI to hold a public meeting in Tunis in May; however, it denied
requests by branch chapters in Tunisia to hold public meetings outside the
capital. In November the Government denied a request by the Tunisia chapter of
AI to hold a public meeting in Tunis to celebrate the reelection of Mahmoud
Romdhane to the International Executive Committee of AI.
Throughout the year, the Government permitted observers
from AI, the International Human Rights Federation, and other international
human rights organizations to monitor trials. The observers reported that the
Government permitted them to conduct their work freely. However, the
Government reportedly blocked access to the Internet web sites produced by
some of these organizations and the web site produced by the Committee to
Protect Journalists (see Section 2.a.). Human rights activists and lawyers
complain of frequently interrupted postal and telephone services.
Human rights offices in certain ministries and a
governmental body, the Higher Commission on Human Rights and Basic Freedoms,
address and sometimes resolve human rights complaints. The Higher Commission
submits confidential reports directly to President Ben Ali. On November 17,
the President created a Ministry of Human Rights, Communications, and
Relations with the Chamber of Deputies, which is within the Prime Minister's
office, and appointed LTDH founder Daly Jazi as Minister. On December 10, Jazi
held a conference in which the role of NGO's in preserving and enforcing human
rights was emphasized.
Section 5 -- Discrimination Based on Race, Sex, Religion,
Disability, Language, or Social Status
The Constitution provides that all citizens shall have
equal rights and responsibilities and be equal under the law, and the
Government generally upholds these rights in practice. Legal or societal
discrimination is not prevalent, apart from that experienced by women in
certain areas, such as inheritance, which is governed by Shari'a. Shari'a
provides that daughters receive only half the amount left to sons.
Women
Violence against women occurs, but there are no reliable
statistics to measure its extent. The Tunisian Democratic Women's Association
operates the country's only counseling center for women who are victims of
domestic violence. The center, located in Tunis, assists approximately 20
women per month. Instances of rape or assault by someone unknown to the victim
are rare. Battered women first seek help from family members. Police
intervention is often ineffective because police officers and the courts tend
to regard domestic violence as a problem to be handled by the family.
Nonetheless, there are stiff penalties for spouse abuse. Both the fine and
imprisonment for battery or violence committed by a spouse or family member
are double those for the same crimes committed by an individual not related to
the victim.
Women enjoy substantial rights and the Government has made
serious efforts to advance those rights, especially in the areas of property
ownership practices and support to divorced women. The 1956 Personal Status
Code outlawed polygamy. A 1998 presidential decree created a national fund to
protect the rights of divorced women, ensuring that the State would provide
financial support to women whose former husbands refused to make alimony
payments. Legislation requires civil authorities to advise couples of the
merits of including provisions for joint property in marriage contracts.
Nonetheless, most property acquired during marriage, including property
acquired solely by the wife, still is held in the name of the husband.
Inheritance law, based on Shari'a and tradition, discriminates against women,
and women still face societal and economic discrimination in certain areas,
such as private sector employment. The Government took strong measures to
reduce official discrimination, including adding equal opportunity for women
as a standard part of its audits of all governmental entities and state-owned
enterprises; however, it did not extend such measures to the private sector.
Women in increasing numbers are entering the work force,
employed particularly in the textile, manufacturing, health, and agricultural
sectors. According to 1994 government statistics, women constituted 25 percent
of the workforce; excluding the agricultural sector, they accounted for 44
percent. Women represent 44 percent of workers in the industrial sector and
46.1 percent of workers in the health sector. There are an estimated 2,000
businesses headed by women. Women constitute one-third of the civil service,
employed primarily in the fields of health, education, and social affairs at
the middle or lower levels. Women represent 60 percent of all judges in the
capital and 25 percent of the nation's total jurists. Approximately 43 percent
of university students enrolled in the 1997-98 academic year were women. The
law explicitly requires equal pay for equal work. The Government has added
equal opportunity for women as a standard part of its audits of all government
ministries, agencies, and state-owned enterprises. On the other hand, while
the rate of illiteracy has dropped markedly in both rural and urban areas, the
rate of female illiteracy in all categories is at least double that of men.
Among 10- to 14-year-old children, 5.5 percent of urban girls are illiterate,
compared with 2.2 percent of urban boys, and 27 percent of rural girls,
compared with less than 7 percent of rural boys.
Several active NGO's focus, in whole or in part, on women's
advocacy, or research women's issues, and a cadre of attorneys represent women
in domestic cases. Media attention focuses on women's economic and academic
accomplishments, and usually omits reference to culturally sensitive issues.
The Government funded several studies and projects designed to improve the
role of women in the media.
In a November 17 cabinet reorganization, President Ben Ali
created a separate Ministry for Women and Family Affairs, and included in the
2000 state budget a separate, and relatively large, budget for the Ministry,
in support of its mission to ensure the legal rights and improve the
socioeconomic status of women. The Government supports and provides funding to
the National Women's Union, women's professional associations, and the
Government's Women's Research Center.
Children
The Government demonstrates a strong commitment to public
education, which is compulsory until age 16. Primary school enrollment for the
1997-98 scholastic year was roughly the same as the preceding year; secondary
school enrollment showed an 8 percent increase. The Government reported that
98 percent of children attend school full-time. The Government offers a
maternal and child health program, providing pre- and post-natal services. It
sponsors an immunization program targeting preschool-aged children, and
reports that over 95 percent of children are vaccinated.
In 1995 the Government promulgated laws as part of a Code
for the Protection of Children. The code proscribes child abuse, abandonment,
and sexual or economic exploitation. Penalties for convictions for abandonment
and assault on minors are severe. There is no societal pattern of abuse of
children. There is a Ministry for Children and Youths and a Presidential
Delegate to Safeguard the Rights and Welfare of Children.
People with Disabilities
The law prohibits discrimination based on disability and
mandates that at least 1 percent of the public and private sector jobs be
reserved for the disabled. All public buildings constructed since 1991 must be
accessible to physically disabled persons. Many cities, including the capital,
have begun to install wheelchair access ramps on city sidewalks. There is a
general trend toward making public transportation more accessible to disabled
persons. The Government issues special cards to the disabled for benefits such
as unrestricted parking, priority medical services, preferential seating on
public transportation, and consumer discounts.
Indigenous People
The Government estimates that the small Amazigh minority
constitutes less than 3 percent of the population. Some older Amazighs have
retained their native language, but the younger generation has been
assimilated into Tunisian culture through schooling and marriage. Berbers are
free to participate in politics and to express themselves culturally.
Section 6 -- Worker Rights
a. The Right of Association
The Constitution and the Labor Code stipulate the right of
workers to form unions. The Tunisian General Federation of Labor is the
country's only labor federation. About 15 percent of the work force, including
civil servants and employees of state-owned enterprises, are members, and a
considerably larger proportion of the work force is covered by union
contracts. There is no legal prohibition against the establishment of other
labor federations. A union may be dissolved only by court order.
The UGTT and its member unions legally are independent of
the Government and the ruling party, but operate under regulations that
restrict their freedom of action. The UGTT's membership includes persons
associated with all political tendencies, although Islamists have been removed
from union offices. There are credible reports that the UGTT receives
substantial government subsidies to supplement modest union dues and funding
from the National Social Security Account. While regional and sector-specific
unions operate with more independence, the central UGTT leadership follows a
policy of cooperation with the Government and its economic reform program.
While criminal charges dating from March 1998 were dropped against dissident
labor activist Abdelmejid Sahraoui on April 2, allowing him to run in UGTT
elections, police physically prevented him from attending the April 6-8 UGTT
congress and elections. Labor activists were among the 21 persons (3 of whom
remain fugitives) convicted in July of defamation, dissemination of false
information, and association with or membership in the illegal Communist
Workers Party (see Sections 1.c, 1.d, 1.e, 2.a., 2.b., and 4). Ten UGTT
members (including Sahraoui) were detained for 48 hours in May after
circulating a petition at the April UGTT congress that criticized the UGTT
secretary general and threatened to establish an alternative labor federation
(see Sections 1.d. and 2.a.).
Unions, including those representing civil servants, have
the right to strike, provided they give 10 days' advance notice to the UGTT
and it approves of the strike. However, this advance approval rarely is sought
in practice. There were numerous short-lived strikes over pay and conditions.
While the majority of these technically were illegal, the Government did not
prosecute workers for illegal strike activity, and the strikes were covered
objectively in the press. The International Confederation of Free Trade Unions
has characterized the requirement for prior UGTT approval of strikes as a
violation of worker rights. The law prohibits retribution against strikers,
but there have been cases of employers punishing them nevertheless, which
forces the strikers to pursue costly and time-consuming legal remedies to
protect their rights.
Labor disputes are settled through conciliation panels in
which labor and management are represented equally. Tripartite regional
arbitration commissions settle industrial disputes when conciliation fails.
Unions are free to associate with international bodies.
b. The Right to Organize and Bargain Collectively
The right to organize and bargain collectively is protected
by law and observed in practice. Wages and working conditions are set in
triennial negotiations between the UGTT member unions and employers.
Forty-seven collective bargaining agreements set standards for industries in
the private sector and cover 80 percent of the total private sector workforce.
Each accord is negotiated by representatives of unions and employers in the
area it covered. The Government's role in these negotiations is minimal,
consisting mainly of lending its good offices if talks appear to be stalled.
However, the Government must approve (but may not modify) the agreements. When
approved the agreements set standards for all employees, both union and
nonunion, in the areas that they cover. The 1999 triennial negotiation
extended well beyond the May deadline, with a few public sector collective
bargaining agreements still not concluded by year's end. The agreements signed
provided for annual wage increases ranging from 4 to 6 percent.
The UGTT also negotiates wages and work conditions of civil
servants and employees of state-owned enterprises.
The law prohibits antiunion discrimination by employers.
However, the UGTT is concerned about antiunion activity among private sector
employers, especially the firing of union activists and the use of temporary
workers to avoid unionization. In certain industries, such as textiles and
construction, temporary workers account for a large majority of the work
force. The Labor Code protects temporary workers, but enforcement is more
difficult than in the case of permanent workers. The UGTT held discussions
with the Government on this issue, but no progress was reported by year's end.
A committee chaired by an officer from the Labor Inspectorate of the Office of
the Inspector General of the Ministry of Social Affairs, and including a labor
representative and an employers' association representative, approves all
worker dismissals.
c. Prohibition of Forced or Compulsory Labor
The law prohibits forced or compulsory labor by either
adults or children, and it is not known to occur. The Government abolished
compulsory labor in 1989.
d. Status of Child Labor Practices and Minimum Age for
Employment
The minimum age for employment in manufacturing is 16
years. The minimum age for light work in agriculture and some other
nonindustrial sectors is 13 years. The law also requires children to attend
school until age 16. Workers between the ages of 14 and 18 must have 12 hours
of rest per day, which include the hours between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. Children
between the ages of 14 and 16 may work no more than 2 hours per day. The total
time that they spend in school and work may not exceed 7 hours per day.
Inspectors of the Ministry of Social Affairs examine the records of employees
to verify that employers comply with the minimum age law. Nonetheless, young
children often perform agricultural work in rural areas and work as vendors in
urban areas, primarily during the summer vacation from school.
The UGTT has expressed concern that child labor continues
to exist disguised as apprenticeship, particularly in the handicraft industry,
and in the cases of teenage girls whose families place them as household
domestics in order to collect their wages. There are no reliable statistics on
the extent of this phenomenon; however, an independent lawyer who conducted a
study of the practice concluded that hiring of underage girls as household
domestics has declined with increased government enforcement of school
attendance and minimum work age laws. The law prohibits forced and bonded
child labor, and the Government enforces this prohibition effectively (see
Section 6.c.).
e. Acceptable Conditions of Work
The Labor Code provides for a range of administratively
determined minimum wages, which are set by a commission of representatives
from the Ministries of Social Affairs, Planning, Finance, and National Economy
in consultation with the UGTT and the Employers' Association. The President
approves the commission's recommendations. On May 1, the industrial minimum
wage was raised by 6.32 dinars to $153 (178.880 dinars) per month for a
48-hour workweek and $134 (156.691 dinars) per month for a 40-hour workweek.
The agricultural minimum wage is $4.71 (5.509 dinars) per day. When
supplemented by transportation and family allowances, the minimum wage
provides for a decent standard of living for a worker and family, but nothing
more, as it covers only essential costs. The Labor Code sets a standard
48-hour workweek for most sectors and requires one 24-hour rest period per
week.
Regional labor inspectors are responsible for enforcing
standards. They inspect most firms about once every 2 years. However, the
Government often encounters difficulty in enforcing the minimum wage law,
particularly in nonunionized sectors of the economy. Moreover, more than
240,000 workers are employed in the informal sector, which falls outside the
purview of labor legislation.
The Ministry of Social Affairs has responsibility for
enforcing health and safety standards in the workplace. There are special
government regulations covering such hazardous occupations as mining,
petroleum engineering, and construction. Working conditions and standards tend
to be better in firms that are export oriented than in those producing
exclusively for the domestic market. Workers are free to remove themselves
from dangerous situations without jeopardizing their employment, and they may
take legal action against employers who retaliate against them for exercising
this right.
f. Trafficking in Persons
The law does not prohibit trafficking in persons; however,
it prohibits slavery and bonded labor. There were no reports that persons were
trafficked in, to, or from the country.
Source: U.S. State Department.
|
|