President Anwar Sadat's Address
to the Israeli Knesset

(November 20, 1977)
In the name of God, Mr. Speaker of the Knesset,
ladies and gentlemen, allow me first to thank deeply the Speaker of
the Knesset for affording me this opportunity to address you....
I come to you today on solid ground to shape a new
life and to establish peace. We all love this land, the land of God,
we all, Moslems, Christians and Jews, all worship God....
I do not blame all those who received my decision
when I announced it to the entire world before the Egyptian People's
Assembly. I do not blame all those who received my decision with
surprise and even with amazement, some gripped even by violent
surprise. Still others interpreted it as political, to camouflage my
intentions of launching a new war.
I would go so far as to tell you that one of my
aides at the presidential office contacted me at a late hour
following my return home from the People's Assembly and sounded
worried as he asked me: "Mr. President, what would be our
reaction if Israel actually extended an invitation to you?"
I replied calmly: "I would accept it
immediately. I have declared that I would go to the end of the earth.
I would go to Israel, for I want to put before the people of Israel
all the facts...." No one could have ever conceived that the
president of the biggest Arab state, which bears the heaviest burden
and the main responsibility pertaining to the cause of war and peace
in the Middle East, should declare his readiness to go to the land of
the adversary while we were still in a state of war.
We all still bear the consequences of four fierce
wars waged within 30 years. All this at the time when the families of
the 1973 October war are still mourning under the cruel pain of
bereavement of father, son, husband and brother.
As I have already declared, I have not consulted
as far as this decision is concerned with any of my colleagues or
brothers, the Arab heads of state or the confrontation states.
Most of those who contacted me following the
declaration of this decision expressed their objection because of the
feeling of utter suspicion and absolute lack of confidence between
the Arab states and the Palestine people on the one hand and Israel
on the other that still surges in us all.
Many months in which peace could have been brought
about have been wasted over differences and fruitless discussions on
the procedure of convening the Geneva conference. All have shared
suspicion and absolute lack of confidence.
But to be absolutely frank with you, I took this
decision after long thought, knowing that it constitutes a great
risk, for God Almighty has made it my fate to assume responsibility
on behalf of the Egyptian people, to share in the responsibility of
the Arab nation, the main duty of which, dictated by responsibility,
is to exploit all and every means in a bid to save my Egyptian Arab
people and the pan-Arab nation from the horrors of new suffering and
destructive wars, the dimensions of which are foreseen only by God
Himself.
After long thinking, I was convinced that the
obligation of responsibility before God and before the people make it
incumbent upon me that I should go to the far corners of the world,
even to Jerusalem to address members of the Knesset and acquaint them
with all the facts surging in me, then I would let you decide for
yourselves....
Ladies and gentlemen, there are moments in the
lives of nations and peoples when it is incumbent upon those known
for their wisdom and clarity of vision to survey the problem, with
all its complexities and vain memories, in a bold drive towards new
horizons.
Those who like us are shouldering the same
responsibilities entrusted to us are the first who should have the
courage to make determining decisions that are consonant with the
magnitude of the circumstances. We must all rise above all forms of
obsolete theories of superiority, and the most important thing is
never to forget that infallibility is the prerogative of God alone.
If I said that I wanted to avert from all the Arab
people the horrors of shocking and destructive wars I must sincerely
declare before you that I have the same feelings and bear the same
responsibility towards all and every man on earth, and certainly
towards the Israeli people.
Any life that is lost in war is a human life be it
that of an Arab or an Israeli. A wife who becomes a widow is a human
being entitled to a happy family life, whether she be an Arab or an
Israeli.
Innocent children who are deprived of the care and
compassion of their parents are ours. They are ours, be they living
on Arab or Israeli land.
They command our full responsibility to afford
them a comfortable life today and tomorrow.
For the sake of them all, for the sake of the
lives of all our sons and brothers, for the sake of affording our
communities the opportunity to work for the progress and happiness of
man, feeling secure and with the right to a dignified life, for the
generations to come, for a smile on the face of every child born in
our land, for all that I have taken my decision to come to you,
despite all the hazards, to deliver my address.
I have shouldered the prerequisites of the
historic responsibility and therefore I declared on Feb. 4, 1971,
that I was willing to sign a peace agreement with Israel. This was
the first declaration made by a responsible Arab official since the
outbreak of the Arab- Israeli conflict. Motivated by all these
factors dictated by the responsibilities of leadership, on Oct. 16,
1973, before the Egyptian People's Assembly, I called for an
international conference to establish permanent peace based on
justice. I was not heard.
I was in the position of a man pleading for peace
or asking for a cease-fire. Motivated by the duties of history and
leadership, I signed the first disengagement agreement, followed by
the second disengagement agreement at Sinai.
Then we proceeded, trying both open and closed
doors in a bid to find a certain road leading to a durable and just
peace.
We opened our heart to the peoples of the entire
world to make them understand our motivations and objectives and
actually to convince them of the fact that we are advocates of
justice and peacemakers. Motivated by all these factors, I also
decided to come to you with an open mind and an open heart and with a
conscious determination so that we might establish permanent peace
based on justice....
Ladies and gentlemen, let us be frank with each
other. Using straightforward words and a clear conception with no
ambiguity, let us be frank with each other today while the entire
world, both East and West, follows these unparalleled moments, which
could prove to be a radical turning point in the history of this part
of the world if not in the history of the world as a whole.
Let us be frank with each other, let us be frank
with each other as we answer this important question.
How can we achieve permanent peace based on
justice? Well, I have come to you carrying my clear and frank answer
to this big question, so that the people in Israel as well as the
entire world may hear it....
Before I proclaim my answer, I wish to assure you
that in my clear and frank answer I am availing myself of a number of
facts that no one can deny.
-
The first fact is that no one can build his
happiness at the expense of the misery of others.
-
The second fact: never have I spoken, nor will
I ever speak, with two tongues; never have I adopted, nor will I
ever adopt, two policies. I never deal with anyone except in one
tongue, one policy and with one face.
-
The third fact: direct confrontation is the
nearest and most successful method to reach a clear objective.
-
The fourth fact: the call for permanent and
just peace based on respect for United Nations resolutions has
now become the call of the entire world. It has become the
expression of the will of the international community, whether in
official capitals where policies are made and decisions taken, or
at the level of the world public opinion, which influences
policymaking and decision-taking.
-
The fifth fact, and this is probably the
clearest and most prominent, is that the Arab nation, in its
drive for permanent peace based on justice, does not proceed from
a position of weakness. On the contrary, it has the power and
stability for a sincere will for peace.
The Arab declared intention stems from an awareness prompted by a
heritage of civilization, that to avoid an inevitable disaster
that will befall us, you and the whole world, there is no
alternative to the establishment of permanent peace based on
justice, peace that is not swayed by suspicion or jeopardized by
ill intentions.
In the light of these facts, which I meant to
place before you the way I see them, I would also wish to warn you,
in all sincerity I warn you, against some thoughts that could cross
your minds.
Frankness makes it incumbent upon me to tell you
the following:
-
First, I have not come here for a separate
agreement between Egypt and Israel. This is not part of the
policy of Egypt. The problem is not that of Egypt and Israel.
An interim peace between Egypt and Israel, or between any Arab
confrontation state and Israel, will not bring permanent peace
based on justice in the entire region.
Rather, even if peace between all the confrontation states and
Israel were achieved in the absence of a just solution of the
Palestinian problem, never will there be that durable and just
peace upon which the entire world insists.
-
Second, I have not come to you to seek a
partial peace, namely to terminate the state of belligerency at
this stage and put off the entire problem to a subsequent stage.
This is not the radical solution that would steer us to permanent
peace.
Equally, I have not come to you for a third disengagement
agreement in Sinai or in Golan or the West Bank.
For this would mean that we are merely delaying the ignition of
the fuse. It would also mean that we are lacking the courage to
face peace, that we are too weak to shoulder the burdens and
responsibilities of a durable peace based upon justice.
I have come to you so that together we should
build a durable peace based on justice to avoid the shedding of one
single drop of blood by both sides. It is for this reason that I have
proclaimed my readiness to go to the farthest corner of the earth.
Here I would go back to the big question.
How can we achieve a durable peace based on
justice? In my opinion, and I declare it to the whole world, from
this forum, the answer is neither difficult nor is it impossible
despite long years of feuds, blood, faction, strife, hatreds and
deep-rooted animosity....
You want to live with us, in this part of the
world.
In all sincerity I tell you we welcome you among
us with full security and safety. This in itself is a tremendous
turning point, one of the landmarks of a decisive historical change.
We used to reject you. We had our reasons and our fears, yes.
We refused to meet with you, anywhere, yes.
We were together in international conferences and
organizations and our representatives did not, and still do not,
exchange greetings with you. Yes. This has happened and is still
happening.
It is also true that we used to set as a
precondition for any negotiations with you a mediator who would meet
separately with each party.
Yes. Through this procedure the talks of the first
and second disengagement agreements took place.
Our delegates met in the first Geneva conference
without exchanging a direct word, yes, this has happened.
Yet today I tell you, and I declare it to the
whole world, that we accept to live with you in permanent peace based
on justice. We do not want to encircle you or be encircled ourselves
by destructive missiles ready for launching, nor by the shells of
grudges and hatreds.
I have announced on more than one occasion that
Israel has become a fait accompli, recognized by the world, and that
the two superpowers have undertaken the responsibility for its
security and the defense of its existence. As we really and truly
seek peace we really and truly welcome you to live among us in peace
and security.
There was a huge wall between us that you tried to
build up over a quarter of a century but it was destroyed in 1973. It
was the wall of an implacable and escalating psychological warfare.
It was a wall of the fear of the force that could
sweep the entire Arab nation. It was a wall of propaganda that we
were a nation reduced to immobility. Some of you have gone as far as
to say that even for 50 years to come, the Arabs will not regain
their strength. It was a wall that always threatened with a long arm
that could reach and strike anywhere. It was a wall that warned us of
extermination and annihilation if we tried to use our legitimate
rights to liberate the occupied territories.
Together we have to admit that that wall fell and
collapsed in 1973. Yet, there remains another wall. This wall
constitutes a psychological barrier between us, a barrier of
suspicion, a barrier of rejection; a barrier of fear, or deception, a
barrier of hallucination without any action, deed or decision.
A barrier of distorted and eroded interpretation
of every event and statement. It is this psychological barrier that I
described in official statements as constituting 70 percent of the
whole problem.
Today, through my visit to you, I ask why don't we
stretch out our hands with faith and sincerity so that together we
might destroy this barrier? Why shouldn't our and your will meet with
faith and sincerity so that together we might remove all suspicion of
fear, betrayal and bad intentions?
Why don't we stand together with the courage of
men and the boldness of heroes who dedicate themselves to a sublime
aim? Why don't we stand together with the same courage and daring to
erect a huge edifice of peace?
An edifice that builds and does not destroy. An
edifice that serves as a beacon for generations to come with the
human message for construction, development and the dignity of man.
Ladies and gentlemen, to tell you the truth, peace
cannot be worth its name unless it is based on justice and not on the
occupation of the land of others. It would not be right for you to
demand for yourselves what you deny to others. With all frankness and
in the spirit that has prompted me to come to you today, I tell you
you have to give up once and for all the dreams of conquest and give
up the belief that force is the best method for dealing with the
Arabs.
You should clearly understand the lesson of
confrontation between you and us. Expansion does not pay. To speak
frankly, our land does not yield itself to bargaining, it is not even
open to argument....
We cannot accept any attempt to take away or
accept to seek one inch of it nor can we accept the principle of
debating or bargaining over it.
I sincerely tell you also that before us today
lies the appropriate chance for peace. If we are really serious in
our endeavor for peace, it is a chance that may never come again. It
is a chance that if lost or wasted, the resulting slaughter would
bear the curse of humanity and of history.
What is peace for Israel? It means that Israel
lives in the region with her Arab neighbors in security and safety.
Is that logical? I say yes. It means that Israel lives within its
borders, secure against any aggression. Is that logical? And I say
yes. It means that Israel obtains all kinds of guarantees that will
ensure these two factors. To this demand, I say yes.
Beyond that we declare that we accept all the
international guarantees you envisage and accept. We declare that we
accept all the guarantees you want from the two superpowers or from
either of them or from the Big Five or from some of them. Once again,
I declare clearly and unequivocally that we agree to any guarantees
you accept, because in return we shall receive the same guarantees.
In short then, when we ask what is peace for
Israel, the answer would be that Israel lives within her borders,
among her Arab neighbors in safety and security, within the framework
of all the guarantees she accepts and that are offered to her.
But, how can this be achieved? How can we reach
this conclusion that would lead us to permanent peace based on
justice? There are facts that should be faced with courage and
clarity. There are Arab territories that Israel has occupied and
still occupies by force. We insist on complete withdrawal from these
territories, including Arab Jerusalem.
I have come to Jerusalem, the city of peace, which
will always remain as a living embodiment of coexistence among
believers of the three religions. It is inadmissible that anyone
should conceive the special status of the city of Jerusalem within
the framework of annexation or expansionism. It should be a free and
open city for all believers.
Above all, this city should not be severed from
those who have made it their abode for centuries. Instead of reviving
the precedent of the Crusades, we should revive the spirit of Omar
Ibn al-Khattab and Saladin, namely the spirit of tolerance and
respect for right.
The holy shrines of Islam and Christianity are not
only places of worship but a living testimony of our interrupted
presence here. Politically, spiritually and intellectually, here let
us make no mistake about the importance and reverence we Christians
and Moslems attach to Jerusalem.
Let me tell you without the slightest hesitation
that I have not come to you under this roof to make a request that
your troops evacuate the occupied territories. Complete withdrawal
from the Arab territories occupied after 1967 is a logical and
undisputed fact. Nobody should plead for that. Any talk about
permanent peace based on justice and any move to ensure our
coexistence in peace and security in this part of the world would
become meaningless while you occupy Arab territories by force of
arms.
For there is no peace that could be built on the
occupation of the land of others, otherwise it would not be a serious
peace. Yet this is a foregone conclusion that is not open to the
passion of debate if intentions are sincere or if endeavors to
establish a just and durable peace for our and for your generations
to come are genuine.
As for the Palestine cause, nobody could deny that
it is the crux of the entire problem. Nobody in the world could
accept today slogans propagated here in Israel, ignoring the
existence of a Palestinian people and questioning even their
whereabouts. Because the Palestine people and their legitimate rights
are no longer denied today by anybody; that is nobody who has the
ability of judgment can deny or ignore it. It is an acknowledged
fact, perceived by the world community, both in the East and in the
West, with support and recognition in international documents and
official statements. It is of no use to anybody to turn deaf ears to
its resounding voice, which is being heard day and night, or to
overlook its historical reality.
Even the United States of America, your first
ally, which is absolutely committed to safeguard Israel's security
and existence and which offered and still offers Israel every moral,
material and military support. I say, even the United States has
opted to face up to reality and admit that the Palestinian people are
entitled to legitimate rights and that the Palestine problem is the
cause and essence of the conflict and that so long as it continues to
be unresolved, the conflict will continue to aggravate, reaching new
dimensions.
In all sincerity I tell you that there can be no
peace without the Palestinians. It is a grave error of unpredictable
consequences to overlook or brush aside this cause.
I shall not indulge in past events such as the
Balfour Declaration 60 years ago. You are well acquainted with the
relevant text. If you have found the moral and legal justification to
set up a national home on a land that did not all belong to you, it
is incumbent upon you to show understanding of the insistence of the
people of Palestine for establishment once again of a state on their
land. When some extremists ask the Palestinians to give up the
sublime objective, this in fact means asking them to renounce their
identity and every hope for the future.
I hail the Israeli voices that called for the
recognition of the Palestinian people's right to achieve and
safeguard peace.
Here I tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that it is
no use to refrain from recognizing the Palestinian people and their
right to statehood as their right of return. We, the Arabs, have
faced this experience before with you. And with the reality of the
Israeli existence, the struggle that took us from war to war, from
victims to more victims, until you and we have today reached the edge
of a horrible abyss and a terrifying disaster unless, together, we
seize this opportunity today of a durable peace based on justice.
You have to face reality bravely, as I have done.
There can never be any solution to a problem by evading it or turning
a deaf ear to it. Peace cannot last if attempts are made to impose
fantasy concepts on which the world has turned its back and announced
its unanimous call for the respect of rights and facts....
Direct confrontation and straightforwardness are
the shortcuts and the most successful way to reach a clear objective.
Direct confrontation concerning the Palestinian problem and tackling
it in one single language with a view to achieving a durable and just
peace lie in the establishment of that peace. With all the guarantees
you demand, there should be no fear of a newly born state that needs
the assistance of all countries of the world.
When the bells of peace ring there will be no
hands to beat the drums of war. Even if they existed, they would be
stilled.
Conceive with me a peace agreement in Geneva that
we would herald to a world thirsting for peace. A peace agreement
based on the following points.
-
Ending the occupation of the Arab territories
occupied in 1967.
-
Achievement of the fundamental rights of the
Palestinian people and their right to self-determination,
including their right to establish their own state.
-
The right of all states in the area to live in
peace within their boundaries, their secure boundaries, which
will be secured and guaranteed through procedures to be agreed
upon, which will provide appropriate security to international
boundaries in addition to appropriate international guarantees.
-
Commitment of all states in the region to
administer the relations among them in accordance with the
objectives and principles of the United Nations Charter.
Particularly the principles concerning the nonuse of force and a
solution of differences among them by peaceful means.
-
Ending the state of belligerence in the
region.
Ladies and gentlemen, peace is not a mere
endorsement of written lines. Rather it is a rewriting of history.
Peace is not a game of calling for peace to defend certain whims or
hide certain admissions. Peace in its essence is a dire struggle
against all and every ambition and whim.
Perhaps the example taken and experienced, taken
from ancient and modern history, teaches that missiles, warships and
nuclear weapons cannot establish security. Instead they destroy what
peace and security build.
For the sake of our peoples and for the sake of
the civilization made by man, we have to defend man everywhere
against rule by the force of arms so that we may endow the rule of
humanity with all the power of the values and principles that further
the sublime position of mankind.
Allow me to address my call from this rostrum to
the people of Israel. I pledge myself with true and sincere words to
every man, woman and child in Israel. I tell them, from the Egyptian
people who bless this sacred mission of peace, I convey to you the
message of peace of the Egyptian people, who do not harbor fanaticism
and whose sons, Moslems, Christians and Jews, live together in a
state of cordiality, love and tolerance.
This is Egypt, whose people have entrusted me with
their sacred message. A message of security, safety and peace to
every man, woman and child in Israel. I say, encourage your
leadership to struggle for peace. Let all endeavors be channeled
towards building a huge stronghold for peace instead of building
destructive rockets.
Introduce to the entire world the image of the new
man in this area so that he might set an example to the man of our
age, the man of peace everywhere. Ring the bells for your sons. Tell
them that those wars were the last of wars and the end of sorrows.
Tell them that we are entering upon a new beginning, a new life, a
life of love, prosperity, freedom and peace.
You, sorrowing mother, you, widowed wife, you, the
son who lost a brother or a father, all the victims of wars, fill the
air and space with recitals of peace, fill bosoms and hearts with the
aspirations of peace. Make a reality that blossoms and lives. Make
hope a code of conduct and endeavor....
I have chosen to set aside all precedents and
traditions known by warring countries. In spite of the fact that
occupation of Arab territories is still there, the declaration of my
readiness to proceed to Israel came as a great surprise that stirred
many feelings and confounded many minds. Some of them even doubted
its intent.
Despite all that, the decision was inspired by all
the clarity and purity of belief and with all the true passions of my
people's will and intentions, and I have chosen this road, considered
by many to be the most difficult road.
I have chosen to come to you with an open heart
and an open mind. I have chosen to give this great impetus to all
international efforts exerted for peace. I have chosen to present to
you, in your own home, the realities, devoid of any scheme or whim.
Not to maneuver, or win a round, but for us to win together, the most
dangerous of rounds embattled in modern history, the battle of
permanent peace based on justice.
It is not my battle alone. Nor is it the battle of
the leadership in Israel alone. It is the battle of all and every
citizen in all our territories, whose right it is to live in peace.
It is the commitment of conscience and responsibility in the hearts
of millions.
When I put forward this initiative, many asked
what is it that I conceived as possible to achieve during this visit
and what my expectations were. And as I answer the questions, I
announce before you that I have not thought of carrying out this
initiative from the precepts of what could be achieved during this
visit. And I have come here to deliver a message. I have delivered
the message and may God be my witness.... |