Accusations of Hamas War Crimes
Israelis are being encouraged to write complaints to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights saying that their human rights were violated by war crimes carried out by Hamas leading up to and during Operation Protective Edge. The Israeli educational organization Im Tirzu is facilitating this movement, as any person can submit a complaint against any country or group for human rights violations. Hamas has been frequently accused of commiting war crimes and crimes against humanity by Israeli officials, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu makes the argument that during Operation Protective Edge Hamas has been guilty of commiting "Double war crimes" by both targetting civilians and civilian areas with it's rockets and mortars, and by hiding behind the Palestinian people and using them as human shields for their weapons caches. War crimes constitute when the offender has failed to adhere to the norms of procedure and the normally accepted rules of battle, and these crimes are tried in the UN's International Criminal Court.
Expert on International law and Bar-Ilan University law professor Avi Bell thinks that the Israeli's claim is legitimate, and that Hamas has deprived them of their right to live. According to Bell, Hamas terrorism violates the Israeli's freedom of movement, violates their right to be safe in their own home, and encourages hatred and discrimination based on religion. Avi Bell cites the International Criminal Court's regulations and claims that Hamas has violated 6 war crime statutes leading up to and during Operation Protective Edge. Bell states that Hamas:
Other Jewish leaders believe that the list of war crimes committed by Hamas is much longer.
Attacking Civilians and Soldiers Indiscriminately
The laws of warfare require the waring parties to respect the limits of war and respect and protect civilians and captured combatants. Throughout Operation protective Edge Hamas has shown that they have little regard for Israeli as well as Palestinian civilian lives, by launching rockets from civilian areas and putting their citizens in immediate danger, and using civilians as shields for their weapons caches, forcing Israel to make a difficult choice.
The laws of war protect civilian objects, and these objects include homes, apartments, places of worship, schools, and cultural landmarks. Through the duration of Operation Protective Edge the main goal of Hamas has been the deaths of Israeli citizens, as evidenced by their constant rocket fire directed at civilian areas such as Ashdod, Ashkelon, Eilat, Jerusalem, and Hebron. The Hamas rockets are a war crime because they are being specifically directed at civilian areas frequently, with the actual combat between Israeli and Hamas forces being seen on the ground in Gaza and surrounding Hamas tunnels. There are not soldiers where Hamas is firing, they are strictly firing at civilian areas with homes and communities.
According to the Palestinian Envoy to the UN Human Rights Council, Hamas and the Palestinians would not be able to take Israel to the ICC on accusations of war crimes because Hamas is greviously guilty of war crimes itself. Palestinian official Ibrahim Khraishi, speaking on Palestinian TV on July 9 stated that "The missiles that are now being launched against Israel, each and every missile constitutes a crime against humanity, whether it hits or misses, because it is directed at civilian targets."
Using Weapons That Cannot be Aimed at a Specific Target
The unsophisticated rockets that Hamas is using are not only a danger to Israel, but a danger to their own citizens because they are often poorly constructed and cannot be aimed properly. Qassam rockets fired by Hamas into Israel are highly innacurate due to the fact that they do not have a "canted nozzle" like most other rockets, which means that the nozzle on the Qassam rocket is parallel to the direction of the rocket's flight. This causes the rocket to not be able to spin about it's longitudinal axis during flight, which significantly decreases accuracy but makes it easier for the manufacture and assembly of the rockets. Operation Protective Edge has seen much evidence of the innacuracy of Hamas rockets, with multiple examples of Hamas hitting Gaza power plants with their own rockets and cutting power to the Palestinian people. The Israel Electric Company took care of power for the people of Gaza, and eventually fixed the power plant. On July 28 Hamas militants fired a barage of four rockets that were meant for Israel, but instead one hit Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza and another hit the Shati refugee camp, also inside of Gaza.
Using Human Shields
The most depraved tactic used by Hamas in this conflict is the use of it's own Palestinian people as human shields and pawns. Hamas has been hiding weapons and munitions in multiple public shelters and institutions including schools, hospitals, mosques, and civilian homes. The Hamas operatives fire their rockets and store their supplies in civilian areas, and force the Israeli military to act on these targets, effectively putting all people in the immediate vicinity of their actions in danger. They choose these civilian areas in order to shield themselves from Israeli strikes and maximize the civilian casualties when Israel has no option but to respond, creating a media cycle of sympathy for them and condemnation for Israel. According to a 2009 report by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Hamas has "planned carefully for a major Israeli invasion, Hamas [is] expected to mount an impressive defense using civilians and civilian facilities as cover for it's military activity".
In July 2014, a captured Hamas Resistance Manual shed light on their tactics, including the use of human shields. This manual details the benefits of having civilians among pockets of resistance and fighters because it creates problems for Israel in terms of opening fire, getting medical supplies to injured Gazans, and controlling the civilians. This manual also explains how the destruction of civilian homes helps the Hamas cause and creates negative media coverage of Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces have also gathered photographic evidence of people standing on the roofs of buildings that were going to be struck by an air strike, these people were protecting the weapons hidden inside of the buildings.
As analysis commenced on Operation Protective Edge it became more and more blatantly obvious that Hamas fires weapons from civilian areas deliberately in an attempt to use civilians as shields and maximize civilian casualties. Ghazi Hamad is a senior Hamas official in Gaza who was quoted on September 12 stating that "The Israelis kept saying rockets were fired from schools or hospitals when in fact they were fired 200 or 300 meters (yards) away". This is the first official aknowledgement by a Hamas official of the fact that they fire rockets from the vicinity of civilian protected facilities such as schools, hospitals, and relief buildings.
The use of human shields is not just limited to Palestinian civilians either. There have been multiple videos surfacing of Hamas operatives using foreign journalists as human shields, firing off their rockets right next to where journalists are reporting, to try to make Israel retaliate. In another incident, a Finnish female reporter was filming a segment in the parking lot of Shifa Hospital when Hamas militants set off a rocket in the hospital parking lot, right behind her.
Concealing Terrorist Activity Using Protected Symbols
The most glaring example of this during Operation Protective Edge is Hamas's use of the Shifa hospital in Gaza as an operations base/bunker. The hospital is continuing to see patients as the Hamas operatives congregate in the bunker underneath. This hospital has been a Hamas headquarters for many years, and in 2006 PBS aired a documentary that showed Hamas militants roaming the hallways and offices of the hospital. It is no secret that the hospital doubles as a Hamas operations base, and Hamas officials have held interviews in the hospital before. In the past, the Palestinian Health Ministry has accused Hamas of taking control of areas in Shifa hospital and using rooms for interrogation, torture, and imprisonment.
On August 1 2014, a Finnish female reporter was reporting from Shifa hospital when she witnessed a rocket launched from the parking lot, destined for Israeli territory.
The United Nations has also found evidence of Hamas concealing terrorist activity in schools and mosques.
Below a video can be found of Hamas launching rockets from the roofs of, and next to, medical facilities.
The Palestinian youth are taught to hate and fight their Jewish neighbors through Hamas's elective high school class, available at schools throughout Gaza. The 2014 session saw 13,000 young men sign up for the program, which "create[s] future soldiers and leaders who can defend their cause and appreciate the value of resistance". The class is known as "Futuwwah", and is sponsored by the Hamas Education Ministry in order to indoctrinate the young men into their militant ideology. An enthusiastic 15 year old graduate of the course, Radwan Wasfi was quoted saying that “My officer taught me the values of courage, sacrifice and love of jihad," and also that he could now "do for real what I do in video games". The first group of graduates is known as the "Liberation Vanguards".
A senior Hamas Commander named Zaher Jabarin said in a December 2012 TV interview that "The Palestinian youngsters, the resistance and Jihad warriors, fight and quarrel over performing a courageous suicide operation".
Hamas also uses child labor in addition to training these young soldiers, and an Institute for Palestine Studies report in Summer 2012 showed that over 1,600 children had died while building the tunnels going from Gaza to Israel. There have been concerns over child labor in Gaza since the early 2000's.
Attempts to Take Hostages
The tunnels that the Hamas militants have dug from Gaza into Israel serve only the purpose of attacking and attempting to abduct Israeli citizens and IDF soldiers. Eyal Yifrach (19), Gilad Shaar (16), and Naftali Frenkel (16) were three Israeli students who were abducted and subsequently murdered by terrorists while they were on their way home from school on the night of June 12 2014. This incident sparked a revenge kidnapping of a Palestinian teen Mohammed Abu Khdier carried out by Israelis, and can be traced back as the spark of Operation Protective Edge.
The three teens were hitch-hiking looking for a ride to their homes in central Israel from the West Bank at around 10p.m. on Thursday June 12. They entered a strangers vehicle who promised to drive them home, soon realized that it was not an Israeli vehicle and phoned the police for help. One of the teens can be heard on the recording telling the police officer who answered the phone that he had been kidnapped, but his speech was soft and muffled. Multiple attempts were made to reconnect with the phone after the call ended abruptly but it was eventually passed over as nothing serious, or a possible prank. Later that evening the parents of Gilad Shaar called the local police station and informed the officers that their son had not returned home, and only then were the IDF and the ISA informed of the call recieved over four hours prior.
During the first few days of the search the Israeli military was able to locate where the call was made from, and mounted a 2,500 person manhunt searching the Hebron hills and begining Operation Shuvu Achim (Operation Bring Back Our Brothers). By June 17, almost 300 Palestinian civilians and suspected Hamas leaders/militants had beenarrested on suspicion of having some sort of involvement with the kidnapping. The Israeli government announced that in the first 6 days of the search IDF soldiers had searched 800 structures, some of them perviously used by Hamas for operations.
The following week saw Israel intensify it's search and clash multiple times with Palestinian civillians and/or Hamas militants. There were multiple incidents where fire was exchanged and in some instances there were casualties on the Palestinian side, with 6 people dieng during clashes that week. By the end of the week, on day 14 of the search, Israel announced the identities of it's two key suspects. Marwan Qawasme and Amer Abu Aisheh were both Hamas operatives, had been arrested for engaging in terrorist activities previously, and had dissapeared on the night of the abduction so they were suspects from the begining.
On June 30, after almost 3 weeks of searching that left 8 dead (including 2 of heart attacks from midnight raids), 120 wounded, and 566 arrested, the bodies of the Israeli teens were found bound and buried on land purchased byMarwan Qawasme's family just north of Hebron. An examination of the bodies by an Israeli medical team determined that they had been murdered and buried soon after the initial abduction. In the middle of the night on July 1, the IDF levelled the homes of the two main suspects in custody.
In the wake of the failed cease-fire that was attempted on the morning of August 1 2014, the Israeli Defense Forces believed that one of their soldiers had been kidnapped by Hamas. Second Lieutenant Hadar Goldin was feared to have been kidnapped in an incident that occured only shortly after a humanitarian cease-fire was announced to start at 5a.m. Goldin was born in the United Kingdom, is 23 years old, and is a relative of Israel's Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon. As Goldin and the other members of his brigade approached a tunnel entrance just outside of the Israeli neighborhood of Rafah, they were ambushed and put under heavy fire by Hamas militants. The IDF believed that during this exchange of fire the enemy combatants were able to use the confusion to abduct Goldin into the tunnel. This incident preceeded the official end to the proposed cease-fire, that was announced at 3a.m. and called off at 10a.m.
The following day the Israeli Defense Forces announced, contrary to what the media and they themselves had originally reported, that Second Lieutenant Hadar Goldin was not abducted into a terror tunnel by Hamas, but was instead killed in the line of duty along with the other soldiers he was stationed with. After examining the scene more thoroughly a special panel commissioned by the IDF came to this conclusion, ending over a full day of heartache in tragedy for the Goldin family.
On Wednesaday August 13 2014 a group of Jewish leaders addressed the Un Secretary General Ban Ki-moon for a full 90 minutes, expressing greivances and feelings that Hamas has been commiting many war crimes in the current conflict against Israel. The group included Rabbis Marvin Hier and Abraham Cooper (directors of the Simon Wiesenthal Center), Abraham Foxman from the Anti-Defamation League and Malcolm Hoenlein from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, along with multiple representatives from B'nai B'rith and Hadassah. This group of influential and powerful Jews urged the UN to launch a full and complete investigation into the use of UNRWA schools as Hamas weapons caches and launching points, and also urged them not to permit the UNRWA to handle and supervise the international aid going to Gaza for reconstruction purposes. In addition, the group stated that they believe no peace can come and no long term reconstruction project can be started until Hamas is completely disarmed. Ban Ki-moon was left with a lot to ponder after the group left, as they left him with a comprehensive and cited list of 19 war crimes that they believe to have been committed by Hamas during the current conflict. The full list can be found below.
1) Hamas’ rocket attacks directed at Israel’s civilian population centers deliberately violates the basic principles of distinction (Additional Protocol I, arts. 48, 51(2), 52(1).) Any doubt about this is resolved by the fact that Hamas itself has boasted of its intention to hit population centres. It is well accepted in customary international law that intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking part in hostilities constitutes a war crime. (Rome Statute, art. 8(2)(b)(i))
2) Staging of Attacks From Residential Areas and Protected Sites: The Law of Armed Conflict not only prohibits targeting an enemy’s civilians; it also requires parties to an armed conflict to distinguish their combatant forces from their own civilians, and not to base operations in or near civilian structures, especially protected sites such as schools, medical facilities and places of worship. As the customary law principle is reflected in Article 51(7) of Additional Protocol I: The presence or movements of the civilian population or individual civilians shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations, in particular attempts to shield military objectives from attacks or shield, favor or impede military operations.
3) Use of Civilian Homes and Public Institutions as Bases of Operation – see (2) for citations.
4) Misuse of Medical Facilities and Ambulances – Any time Hamas uses an ambulance to transport its fighters it is violating the Law of Armed Conflict: Under Article 23(f) of the 1907 Regulations annexed to the Hague Convention IV Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, which reflects customary international law, it is especially forbidden … [t]o make improper use of a flag of truce, … as well as the distinctive badges of the Geneva Convention. Article 44 of the First Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and SICK in Armed Forces in the Field (1949)also provides that: … the emblem of the Red Cross on a white ground … may not be employed, either in time of peace or in time of war, except to indicate or to protect the medical units and establishments…
5) Booby-trapping of Civilian Areas – see (2) for citations.
6) Blending in with Civilians and Use of Human Shields – As the ICRC rule states, lilt can be concluded that the use of human shields requires an intentional co-location of military objectives and civilians or persons hors de combat with the specific intent of trying to prevent the targeting of those military objectives.
7) Exploitation of Children – Hamas has paramilitary summer camps for kids. There are reports, from this war and previous ones, of children fighting and being used for tunnel digging. violates the Law of Armed Conflict, including prohibitions against allowing children to take part in hostilities. As customary international law is reflected in this regard in Additional Protocol I, the parties to a conflict must take “all feasible measures” to ensure that children lido not take a direct part in hostilities and, in particular, they shall refrain from recruiting them into their armed forces. (Additional Protocol I, art. 77(2))
8 ) Interference with Humanitarian Relief Efforts – While Israel kept its end of humanitarian truces. Hamas used them to shoot rockets into Israel, including the Kerem Shalom crossing where humanitarian goods are brought into Gaza. All of these actions violate the Law of Armed Conflict, which requires parties to allow the entry of humanitarian supplies and to guarantee their safety. Article 59 of the Fourth Geneva Convention requires parties in an armed conflict to permit the free passage of [humanitarian] consignments and shall guarantee their protection. Article 60 of the same Convention protects the shipments from being diverted from their intended purpose, something Hamas has certainly done in the past and is reported to have done in this conflict as well.
9) Hostage-taking – The Fourth Geneva Conventions, article 34, says flatly “The taking of hostages is prohibited.” This is not an “arrest” as Israel-haters claim, and this is not a prisoner of war situation as Hamas has made clear – the purpose of Hamas’ hostage-taking falls under the definition on the International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages: “Any person who seizes or detains and threatens to kill, to injure or to continue to detain another person (hereinafter referred to as the “hostage “) in order to compel a third party, namely, a State, an international intergovernmental organization, a natural or juridical person, or a group of persons, to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition for the release of the hostage commits the offence of taking of hostages (“hostage-taking ‘) within the meaning of this Convention.
10) Using the uniform of the enemy – Additional Protocol I prohibits the use of enemy flags, military emblems, insignia or uniforms “while engaging in attacks or in order to shield, favour, protect or impede military operations”.  Under the Statute of the International Criminal Court, “making improper use … of the flag or of the military insignia and uniform of the enemy” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts when it results in death or serious personal injury.  According to some, this is considered perfidy, a war crime. (h/t Joshua)
11) Violence aimed at spreading terror among the civilian population – Rule 2 of ICRC’s Customary IHL is Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited. II It quotes Article 51(2) of Additional Protocol I prohibits “acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population”. Hamas rockets are aimed not only at killing civilians, but also at spreading terror among Israelis.
12)Targeting civilian objects, such as airports or nuclear power plants – Rule 7 of the Customary IHL says “Attacks must not be directed against civilian objects, quoting Articles 48 and 52(2)of Additional Protocol I.
13. Indiscriminate attacks – Besides targeting civilians and civilian objects, Rule 11 of the ICRC CIHL states flatly that “Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. II By definition, every Qassam rocket attack and most of the other rocket and mortar attacks are by their very nature indiscriminate. See also Rule 71, “The use of weapons which are by nature indiscriminate is prohibited.
14) Proportionality in attack – ICRC’s Rule 14 states “Launching an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated, is prohibited. Rocket attacks against civilians have zero military advantage, so by definition they are disproportionate to their military advantage. See also Rule 18: “Each party to the conflict must do everything feasible to assess whether the attack may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.
15)Advance Warning – Rule 20 of the ICRC CIHL states “Each party to the conflict must give effective advance warning of attacks which may affect the civilian population, unless circumstances do not permit. Given that Hamas has used the media and SMS calls to threaten Israelis, it is clear that they have the ability to warn before every rocket attack. Their failure to do so is a violation of IHL.
16) Protecting civilians – Rule 22 of the ICRC Customary IHL states, “The parties to the conflict must take all feasible precautions to protect the civilian population and civilian objects under their control against the effects of attacks. Hamas not only has failed to protect civilians in Gaza by building bomb shelters, they have deliberately put civilians in harm’s way.
17) Attacking medical units – Rule 28 states, Medical units exclusively assigned to medical purposes must be respected and protected in all circumstances. Hamas has shot mortars at the Israeli field hospital, set up for Gazans, near the Erez crossing.
18) Protection of Journalists – Hamas has threatened journalists, implicitly and explicitly, accusing some of being spies and sometimes not allowing them to leave Gaza, making them effectively hostages. Rule 34 states “Civilian journalists engaged in professional missions in areas of armed conflict must be respected and protected as long as they are not taking a direct part in hostilities.
19) Mistreating the dead. Rule 113 says, Each party to the conflict must take all possible measures to prevent the dead from being despoiled. Mutilation of dead bodies is prohibited. Hamas has shown off an alleged chip cut out from the (presumably) dead body of Shaul Orono
Accusations of Israeli War Crimes
Throughout Operation Protective Edge the international community has had a lot to say about Israel's conduct in the Gaza Strip, and there have been accusations of war crimes being committed on both sides. International groups such as Human Rights Watch have been critical of Israel's actions and have even gone so far as to accuse the IDF of breaking international law by striking civilian facilities such as homes and hospitals. The Goldstone Report, released after Israel's last invasion of Gaza in 2009, detailed and claimed that Israel had commited war crimes during the operation in Gaza by: wilful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, and extensive destruction of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly. According to some members of the international comminty, Israel is guilty of war crimes for:
The United States has said that it will almost certainly veto any UN Security Council proposal to investigate Israel for war crimes committed in Gaza. The United States officials wish to have an independent review and analysis done of the conflict in Gaza, not involving the UN Security Council.
Targeting of Civilian Facilities
The Israeli Defense Forces claim to have extremely accurate strike capabilities, but even with sophisticated rockets and tracking systems civilian casualties occur. The IDF has come under heavy international scrutiny for explosions and strikes near schools, hospitals, and homes in the Gaza Strip. On Sunday August 3, the international news media reported that there had been an Israeli air strike carried out on Rafah Preparatory Boys School, which was at the time being used as a UN run shelter for about 3,000 people. There were explosions heard outside of the school gates, and multiple people outside of the school were killed or injured while they were waiting to buy food and drinks from street vendors. The strike hit about 10 metres from the school grounds, outside the gates on the street, and was reported as an attack on the school itself. According to the US State Department Israeli forces know the exact coordinates of every UN sanctioned school and facility in Gaza, and the United States has slammed Israel for the attack. In it's defense, Israeli officials stated that they were targeting Hamas militants who were riding a motorcycle in front of the school at the time. Israel claims that it struck it's intended targets. Even if the terrorists were within the vicinity of the school, UN run shelters are protected by the Geneva Convention and any strike on a Un run facility is a gross violation of international rules of conduct.
In another incident on July 28 Israeli forces fired on Gaza's Al-Shifa Hospital, in an attack that killed 10. They claimed that there had been rockets fired by militants from the hospital parking lot and grounds, which Hamas denied. There have been multiple videos shot of Hamas operatives firing rockets from the hospital parking lot, even near reporters currently in the middle of a live news report. Shifa hospital is internationally known as a hiding place for Hamas terrorists. In 2006 PBS aired a documentary that showed Hamas militants wandering the halls of the hospital, and the hospital rooms are often used by Hamas for everything from conducting interviews to torturing and detaining people. The hospital staff are not allowed in certian portions of the building, and Hamas members intimidate and harass the employees. Hamas uses the hospital as cover for it's terrorist activities in the bunker below while patients are treated in the hospital above.
Israel justifies these actions by stating that Hamas exploits neutral protected facilities like schools and hospitals by using them as weapons caches and rocket launching points. Israeli and international forces have uncovered at least 3 seperate caches of weapons in UN sanctioned schools, and discovered multiple examples of Hamas doing the same with Mosques in the area. Videos have been taken of Hamas firing rockets from hospital parking lots, just outside of school buildings, and packed residential neighborhoods. The international community knows that Hamas uses hospitals and other protected civilian facilities as cover for it's operations.
Israeli forces have also been accused of targeting individual civilians while they were being complaint. In one instance a group of Israeli soldiers opened fire on a group of Palestinians that they had just released from questioning as they were walking down the street in the opposite direction of the soldiers. The soldiers killed one and injured two others. In another incident Israel bombed the home of Tayseer al-Batsh, a Gaza police chief who was not currently involved in military offensives against the IDF, and killed him and 18 of his family members.
According to Kenneth Roth, the executive director of the organization Human Rights Watch, Israel's rocket fire into Gaza constitute war crimes because he claims that Israel is firing the rockets knowing that the number of civilian casualties will be disproportionate to the comparative military gain achieved. Roth has acknowledged on his twitter that he believes the rockets fired from Hamas are war crimes as well, stating that "#Hamas is still firing rockets indiscriminately at Israel. These are war crimes. But they don't justify #Israel's own crimes, killing many".
The IDF claims that when these civilian facilities become used for military purposes then they become legitimate military targets, and Israel's critics say that these strikes serve no strategic military purpose.
Imposing Collective Punishment
The argument could be made that the entirety of Operation Protective Edge is imposing collective punishment on the Palestinian people for Hamas's abduction and murder of three Israeli teens in June. After the abduction the Israeli military searched over 1,000 structures in the Gaza Strip and clashed with Palestinian citizens and Hamas members many times. There have been multiple examples of retaliatory attacks, that could possibly be considered Israel imposing collective punishment on the Palestinian people for the actions of Hamas. For example, the first weekend in August there was an attack carried out by Israeli forces on a marketplace in Rafah, and statements on social media hinted that the attack was a retaliation after an attack in Rafah left two IDF soldiers dead and Second Lieutenant Hadar Goldin potentially abducted (but then later reported dead). Some claim that the motives for this attack were to terrorize the citizens of Rafah and collectively punish them for the actions of the Hamas militants earlier in the day. If this is the case, this could certainly be considered a war crime.
In the eyes of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay, Israel has committed an egregious war crime by not sharing it's Iron Dome missile defense system with the people that it is supposed to protect Israel from. Israel's Iron Dome is Israel's primary rocket defense system, and the most advanced system of it's kind in the world. Funded in conjunction with the US government, the Iron Dome has been keeping Israel safer since it's inception in 2007, and has intercepted hundreds of rockets during Operation Protective Edge. Mrs Pillay slammed the United States at a meeting of the UN Human Rights Council for funding the Iron Dome for Israel but not providing the same adequate protection for citizens of the Gaza Strip. The United Nations is claiming that Israel is using disproportionate force when dealing with Hamas, and states that Israel should have shared it's Iron Dome missile defense system with the Palestinians. Because Gaza is an occupied territory according to the United Nations Israel has an obliogation to protect the citizens of Gaza, and the UN claims that Israel is not fulfilling it's obligation to protect those citizens by not providing them with the same Iron Dome that Israel has.
The International Criminal Court
On Tuesday August 5 the Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki held a meeting with the UN's International Criminal Court's prosecutor Fatou Bensouda. The goal of this conversation was to inquire how a state could accept the jurisdiction of the ICC; Malki wanted to know how the Palestinian authority could go about trying Israel in the ICC for war crimes committed in Gaza. The Bar Council's human rights committee sent a letter to Bensouda asking for investigations into Israeli war crimes committed in the Gaza Strip as well, stating that they believed that it was under the ICC jurisdiction to bring such charges under article 15 of the ICC's Rome Statute.
Palestine, however, is not a signatory to the ICC's Rome Statute. The United Nations also has not, according to Bensouda, "received any official document from Palestine indicating acceptance of ICC jurisdiction or requesting the prosecutor to open an investigation into any alleged crimes". Because Palestine is not a signatory to the Rome Statute and has never indicated that they are accepting of the ICC's jurisdiction, they are not able to enter any formal complaints of war crimes committed on their territory. The International Criminal Court has "no jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed on the territory of Palestine". The Palestinian leaders are currently in talks to join the ICC in order to prosecute Israel for alleged war crimes committed during Operation Protective Edge. By signing on to the Rome Statute, Palestine would become a legitimate member of the court, able to call for an investigation into possible war crimes.
The United Nations Human Rights Council
The United Nations named experts in international law and human rights violations to a panel known as the Gaza Commission of Inquiry on August 11 2014. The purpose of this commission is to investigate and determine whether war crimes were committed by either side during Operation Protective Edge. The commission includes Doudou Diene from Senegal, and Canadian Professor Dr WIlliam Schabas. The choice made by the UN to put Schabas in charge of this investigation has been met with harsh criticism from Israel and it's supporters. Schabas is openly anti-Israel and holds strong opinions on Israeli issues and people, stating that he would love to see Benjamin Netanyahu "on the dock of the International Criminal Court". Due to these views, Israeli government officials have dismissed Schabas as a legitimate impartial investigator and have claimed that no investigation needs to be done because the verdict has already been decided by Schabas's vehemently anti-Israel bias. In a letter to the UN Security General Ban Ki-Moon on August 12, Israel's ambassador to the UN Ron Proser wrote:
"Mr. Schabas’s agenda is clear. He has repeatedly called for the prosecution of Prime Minister Netanyahu and former President Shimon Peres saying, “My favorite would be Netanyahu within the dock of the International Criminal Court.”
In light of his hate-fuelled rants, one doesn’t need to be a fortune teller to predict the outcome of any inquiry led by Mr. Schabas. Furthermore, the exploitation of the UNHRC by some of the world’s worst human rights abusers is a grave misfortune for the millions of oppressed people around the world. While the Council is singularly focused on its anti-Israeli agenda, the world’s most murderous tyrants continue brutalizing their people.
I call on you to publically denounce the appointment of Mr. Schabas. His selection is a disgraceful stain on the values that the UN claims to stand for."
Hamas members have praised the appointment of Schabas to the commission; Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri stated ""Hamas welcomes the decision to form an investigation committee into the war crimes committed by the occupation (Israel) against Gaza and it urges that it begin work as soon as possible". The Gaza Inquiry Commission is due to present it's findings to the UNHRC before March 2015.
On August 25, it was announced that former New York Supreme Court Judge Mary McGowan Davis was going to be the third member of the commission, alongside Schabas and Diene.
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch
Following the removal of ground troops from Gaza and the end of the ground operation portion of Operation Protective Edge, Israel has been preventing the human rights NGO's Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch from entering the Gaza Strip.
These organizations are supposedly seeking to evaluate the war crimes situation during the conflict and determine through an independent analysis whether or not war crimes were committed by either side.
The organizations have been attempting to gain entry to Gaza since July 7 2014.
Neither one of these organizations is on an approved list
of aid groups designated by the
Israeli Ministry of Social Affairs,
as they are not UN agencies.
The Israelis additionally claim that since the border crossings into Gaza have been strictly monitored since the begining of these recent hostilities, that they were not issuing any new permits for approved groups. In addition, according to
the accountability website www.ngomonitor.org:
"... the evidence clearly demonstrates that neither Amnesty International nor HRW is capable of conducting independent, unbiased, and credible investigations, particularly in the context of intense conflict, and environments where information is strictly controlled and manipulated by groups like Hamas. Neither NGO abides by international fact-finding standards such as the Lund-London Guidelines adopted by the International Bar Association. In addition to the lack of objectivity, their research processes are entirely non-transparent and not subject to accountability or independent verification.
Officials from Amnesty and HRW are not trained professionals in criminal and military investigations and forensics, do not possess the requisite expertise, and do not produce findings that would be admissible in legal proceedings. Their main practice consists of conducting unverifiable “witness” interviews, claiming to ascertain whether Palestinian fighters were present in the location of Israeli operations. (This determination is essential to resolve questions of military necessity and compliance with international law.) Neither group discloses the extent to which its staff is shadowed by Hamas and whether Hamas minders select interview subjects. Such practices were among the factors that discredited the NGO-based Goldstone Report on Gaza, published in 2009. More importantly, their activities, which do not adhere to professional standards, may jeopardize genuine investigations by tainting evidence and witnesses".
Sources:Israel Today, Times of Israel, YNet News, Israel National News, Tablet Magazine, The Washington Times, RT, The Blaze, NGO Monitor, The Washington Post