History & Overview
In September 1993, following intense behind-the-scenes
contacts between Israeli and Palestinian negotiators in Oslo, an agreement
achieved between Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres and PLO Chairman Yasser
On September 9, 1993, Arafat sent a letter to Prime
Minister Rabin, in which he stated
unequivocally that the PLO:
- Recognizes the right of Israel to exist in peace and security;
- Accepts UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338;
- Commits itself to a peaceful resolution of the conflict;
- Renounces the use of terrorism and other acts of violence;
- Assumes responsibility over all PLO elements o ensure their
prevent violations, and
- Affirms that those articles of the PLO
Covenant which deny Israel's right to exist are now
inoperative and no longer valid;
- Undertakes to submit to the Palestinian National Council for formal
approval the necessary changes to
In reply, Israel recognized the PLO as the representative of the
in the peace negotiations.
On September 13, 1993, a joint Israeli-Palestinian Declaration of Principles (DOP), based on the
agreement worked out in Oslo, was signed by the two parties in Washington,
outlining the proposed
interim self-government arrangements, as envisioned and agreed by both
The arrangements contained in the
DOP include immediate Palestinian self-rule in Gaza and Jericho, early
empowerment for the Palestinians
in West Bank, and an agreement on self-government and the election of a
Additionally, extensive economic cooperation between Israel and the
Palestinians plays an important role
in the DOP.
The Interim Agreement
Shortly after the signing of the Declaration of Principles, negotiations
commenced between Israeli and PLO delegations on the
implementation of the interim agreement, which was accomplished in three
1. The Gaza-Jericho Agreement was signed in Cairo on May 4, 1994, and
applies to the Gaza Strip and to a defined area of about 65 square
including Jericho and its
environs. While the Declaration of Principles is a short document,
of approximately 20 pages,
the Gaza-Jericho Agreement is a document containing almost 300 pages (the
agreement itself and four
annexes) with six maps attached. The Gaza-Jericho agreement addresses four
main issues -- security
arrangements, civil affairs, legal matters, and economic relations.
The document includes agreement to a withdrawal of Israeli military forces
from Gaza and
Jericho, a transfer of authority from the Israeli Civil Administration to
Palestinian Authority, the
structure and composition of the Palestinian Authority, its jurisdiction
legislative powers, a
Palestinian police force, and relations between Israel and the Palestinian
2. On August 29, 1994, the Agreement
on Preparatory Transfer of Powers and Responsibilities was signed by Israel and the Palestinians. The
puts into effect the next
phase (early empowerment) of the Declaration of Principles.
In accordance with the DOP, the Agreement provides for the transfer of
to the Palestinian
Authority within five specified spheres:
- Education & Culture (carried out on August 29, 1994);
- Social Welfare;
- Tourism (both carried out on November 13-14, 1994);
- Taxation (both carried out on December 1, 1994).
On August 27, 1995, an protocol
transferring additional spheres to the Palestinian Authority: labor, trade
gas and gasoline, insurance, postal services, statistics, agriculture, and
3. On September 28, 1995, the Israeli-Palestinian
Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip was signed in
Washington, D.C. This agreement, which marks the conclusion of the first
between Israel and the PLO, incorporates and supersedes the Gaza-Jericho
Early Empowerment agreements.
The main object of the Interim Agreement is to broaden Palestinian
self-government in the West Bank by means of an elected self-governing
authority -- the Palestinian Council -- for an interim period not to
five years from the signing of the Gaza-Jericho Agreement (i.e. no later
May 1999). This will allow the Palestinians to conduct their own internal
affairs, reduce points of friction between Israelis and Palestinians, and
a new era of cooperation and co-existence based on common interest,
mutual respect. At the same time it protects Israel's vital interests, and
particular its security interests, both with regard to external security
well as the personal security of its citizens in the West Bank.
The Interim Agreement sets forth the future relations between Israel and
Palestinians. To the main body of the agreement are appended seven annexes
dealing with: security arrangements, elections, civil affairs (transfer of
powers), legal matters, economic relations, Israeli-Palestinian
and the release of Palestinian prisoners.
Milestones in the Implementation of the Interim Agreement
On January 20, 1996, following completion of the first stage of IDF redeployment (with the exception of Hebron), elections were held to the
Palestinian Council and for the Head of the Palestinian Authority.
Yasser Arafat was elected Ra'ees (head) of the Authority.
On April 24, 1996, the Palestinian National Council, convening in Gaza,
voted 504 to 54, with 14 abstentions, as follows:
- "The Palestinian National Charter is hereby amended by canceling the
articles that are contrary to the letters exchanged between the
P.L.O. and the Government of Israel 9-10 September 1993.
- Assigns its legal committee with the task of redrafting the
Palestinian National Charter in order to present it to the first
session of the Palestinian central council." (24/04/96)
On December 14, 1998, the Palestinian National Council, in accordance with the Wye River Memorandum, convened in Gaza in the presence of U.S. President Clinton and voted to reaffirm this decision.
An agreement on a Temporary International Presence in Hebron was signed on May 9, 1996.
The Protocol Concerning the Redeployment in Hebron was signed on January 17, 1997. The Protocol was accompanied by a Note for the Record prepared by the US Special Middle East Coordinator, confirming a series of agreements between the sides on non-Hebron issues and reaffirming their commitment to implement the Interim Agreement on the basis of reciprocity.
On October 23, 1998, The Wye River Memorandum was signed at the White House, Washington D.C., between Israel and the PLO, following a nine-day summit hosted by U.S. President Mr. Bill Clinton in Wye Plantation, Maryland.
On September 4, 1999, the Sharm el-Sheikh Memorandum was signed by representatives of Israel and the PLO. Restating the commitment of the two sides to full
implementation of all agreements reached since September
1993, the Memorandum sets out to resolve the
outstanding issues of the present interim status, in particular those
set out in the Wye River Memorandum of October 23, 1998.
The sides also restated their commitment to the Interim Agreement's
prohibition regarding initiating or taking any step that will change
the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip prior to the
conclusion of the permanent status agreement.
Stages of Sharm el-Sheikh implementation:
Release of prisoners: Sep 9, 1999; Oct 15, 1999.
Additional prisoners released for Ramadan: Dec 1999; Jan 2000.
Further redeployments: Sep 10, 1999 (7%); Jan 5-7, 2000 (5%); Mar 21, 2000 (6.1%)
Safe passage: southern route Oct 25, 1999; Shuhada Street Oct 31, 1999
Displaced persons committee convenes: February 6, 2000
Permanent Status Negotiations
The negotiations on the permanent status arrangements commenced in Taba on May 5, 1996. These negotiations will deal with the remaining issues to be
resolved, including Jerusalem, refugees, settlements, security
arrangements, borders, relations and cooperation with neighboring
In a joint communique issued on May 6 at the close of the first session of
talks, the two sides reaffirmed the principles guiding these negotiations.
In the Wye Memorandum of October 23, 1998 both sides agreed to immediately
resume permanent status negotiations on an accelerated basis and to make a
determined effort to reach agreement by May 4, 1999. A first meeting between Foreign Minister Sharon and Abu Mazen took place on November 18, 1998.
Following the Sharm el-Sheikh Memorandum, the permanent status negotiations were formally resumed on September 13, 1999, at the Erez checkpoint. Foreign Minister David Levy was appointed to head the Israeli negotiating team with the
Palestinians, and Abu-Mazen heads the
In his speech at the opening of the talks, Foreign Minister Levy summarized the basic principles by which Israel will be guided up in negotiating a permanent
status agreement: we will not return to the 1967 lines; united Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel; settlement blocs in the territories will
remain under Israeli sovereignty; there will be no foreign army west
of the Jordan River.
At the urging of Israeli Prime Minister Barak, US President Clinton announced on July 5, 2000, his invitation to Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat to come to Camp David to continue their negotiations on the Middle East peace process.
On July 11, the Camp David 2000 Summit convened. The summit ended on July 25, without an agreement being reached. At its conclusion, a Trilateral Statement was issued defining the agreed principles to guide future negotiations.
Under the shadow of violence and terrorism, President Clinton hosted talks with Israeli and Palestinian teams in Washington from December 19-23, 2000, at the conclusion of which Clinton presented a bridging proposal to the parties.
Following a meeting in Cairo between Foreign Minister Ben-Ami and Chairman Arafat, marathon talks between Israeli and Palestinian delegations were held in Taba from January 21-27, 2001, ending in a joint statement.
A policy statement issued by the Israeli government following the election of Ariel Sharon as Prime Minister in February 2001, reaffirmed the Israeli government's determination in its asipration to achieve peace with its Palestinian neighbors, but that the conduct of peace negotiations calls for tranquility.
Numerous efforts to end the violent confrontation and renew the peace process have failed due to the ongoing and escalating Palestinian terrorism supported by the Palestinian Authority. Israel accepted the vision presented in the speech by U.S. President Bush on June 24, 2002 for ending Palestinian terrorism, to be followed by the final settlement of all issues and peace. On April 30, 2003, the "road map" for a solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict was presented to Israel and the Palestinians.
Following a U.S. statement regarding the Israeli comments on the road map, promising to address the Israeli concerns fully and seriously in the implementation, on May 23, 2003 Prime Minister Sharon issued a statement accepting the road map.
This acceptance was approved by the Government of Israel on May 25. A Middle East summit meeting, hosted by Jordanian King Abdullah II and attended by U.S. President Bush, Prime Minister Sharon and Palestinian Prime Minister Abbas was held in Aqaba on June 4, 2003.
The "hudna" (cease-fire) announced by the Fatah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorist organizations on June 29, 2003 came to a violent end with the August 19th suicide bombing of a bus in Jerusalem, in which 22 people were killed and over 130 wounded. As a result of the attack, the Cabinet decided on September 1, 2003, among others, to wage an all-out war against Hamas and other terrorist elements, and to freeze the diplomatic process with the Palestinian Authority.
On June 6, 2004, Israel's cabinet approved the plan for disengagement from the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and northern Samaria. The Knesset endorsed the plan on October 25, 2004.
A summit meeting was held in Sharm el-Sheikh on February 8, 2005, attended by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, and King Abdullah of Jordan. It was decided that all Palestinians would stop all acts of violence against all Israelis, and Israel would cease all its military activity against all Palestinians.
On August 15, 2005, Israel began the implementation of disengagement from the Gaza Strip and four northern Samaria communities. Disengagement from the Gaza Strip was completed on August 22, and from northern Samaria on August 23, 2005. On September 12, 2005, IDF forces completed their exit from the Gaza Strip. The Head of the IDF Southern Command, Maj. Gen. Dan Harel, signed a declaration stating the end of military rule in the Gaza Strip after 38 years.
On August 21, Prime Minister Sharon told the Cabinet: “In the Disengagement Plan there is only one stage of disengagement. The next stage in the diplomatic negotiations regards the Roadmap.”
Israel left the Gaza Strip in August 2005 in order to create the opportunity for peace. After the elections in the Palestinian Authority (January 2006) resulting in the establishment of the Hamas-led government, Israel adopted a dual strategy towards the Palestinians, maintaining pressure against Hamas and the extremists while not closing the door to dialogue with the moderates among the Palestinians towards a negotiated two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The Hamas takeover of the Gaza Strip in June 2007 and the subsequent formation of the new moderate Fatah-led Palestinian government under President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad opened the door to a resumption of talks between Israel and the Palestinians, towards the achievement of the goal of two homelands for two peoples, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security.
The future Palestinian state cannot be a terrorist entity. For this reason, the international community has insisted that the path to Palestinian statehood must follow acceptance of the conditions outlined by the international 'Quartet' (the UN, EU, US and Russia), including the renunciation of terrorism, acceptance of previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements and the recognition of Israel's right to exist.
The Annapolis Conference
An international conference convened in Annapolis on November 27, 2007, to relaunch the negotiating process. Negotiating teams from both sides began direct talks in Jerusalem on December 12. The International Donors' Conference for the Palestinian State which convened in Paris on December 17 expressed political and financial support to the government of President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and their vision of a future Palestinian state, underpinning the political process launched in Annapolis.
In June 2009, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented his vision of peace with the Palestinians based on the principles of recognition and demilitarization: "In my vision of peace, in this small land of ours, two peoples live freely, side-by-side, in amity and mutual respect. Each will have its own flag, its own national anthem, its own government... A fundamental prerequisite for ending the conflict is a public, binding and unequivocal Palestinian recognition of Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people. The territory under Palestinian control must be demilitarized with ironclad security provisions for Israel. Without these two conditions, there is a real danger that an armed Palestinian state would emerge that would become another terrorist base against the Jewish state, such as the one in Gaza." He called on the Arab countries "to cooperate with the Palestinians and with us to advance an economic peace. An economic peace is not a substitute for a political peace, but an important element to achieving it."
Various measures have been implemented by the Israeli government in order to strengthen and develop the Palestinian economy. These steps have been both bilateral and multilateral, involving the PA, Israel and the international community (both governmental and non-governmental). The results have been impressive and encouraging, with World Bank and PA statistics showing an 8% growth in the West Bank economy in 2009.
On March 8, 2010, Special Envoy for Middle East Peace George Mitchell made the following statement:
I'm pleased that the Israeli and Palestinian leadership have accepted indirect talks. We've begun to discuss the structure and scope of these talks and I will return to the region next week to continue our discussions. As we've said many times, we hope that these will lead to direct negotiations as soon as possible. We also again encourage the parties, and all concerned, to refrain from any statements or actions which may inflame tensions or prejudice the outcome of these talks.
After his meeting with US President Obama (July 6, 2010), Prime Minister Netanyahu said: "There's a much greater meeting of the minds between President Obama and me on how to move forward at this time, how to make the transition from proximity talks into direct talks, and how to ensure that those direct talks are as substantive as possible and as soon as possible. I think that this delay does not get us any benefit. I think delaying the process, talking about talking, making conditions about getting into talks is a big mistake. I think it's cost us about a year, and I don't think it should cost us any more time."
Abortive Attempt to Restart Talks
On August 20, 2010, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton invited Israel and the Palestinians to hold direct negotiations: "I’ve invited Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Abbas to meet on September 2 in Washington, D.C. to re-launch direct negotiations to resolve all final status issues, which we believe can be completed within one year.
Addressing a Joint Meeting of the U.S. Congress in May 2011, PM Netanyahu reiterated his commitment to the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside the Jewish state, adding: "I recognize that in a genuine peace, we will be required to give up parts of the Jewish homeland. We seek a peace in which they will be neither Israel's subjects nor its citizens. They should enjoy a national life of dignity as a free, viable and independent people in their own state. They should enjoy a prosperous economy, where their creativity and initiative can flourish."
While Israel remained dedicated to direct negotiations as the only method of resolving the conflict, the Palestinian leadership embarked on the path of unilateral action, preferring to attempt to force their will on Israel through international pressure, with the submission of a request for admission to the United Nations in September 2011.
On July 28, 2013, the Israeli Cabinet approved the opening of diplomatic negotiations between the State of Israel and the Palestinians, with U.S. support, with the objective of achieving a final status agreement over the course of the following nine months.
In November 2014 French officials produced a draft resolution outlining a “vision of a region where two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, live side by side in peace.” The resolution included five parameters for Israeli-Palestinian peace including the re-establishment of pre-1967 borders. The United States did not have any direct role in crafting the plan, but sources confirmed that Washington had been unofficially advising Paris about things to include in the resolution. Israel considered the text of this resolution to be too pro-Palestinian, with multiple calls to stop settlements but no mention of Hamas rocket and mortar attacks on Israeli civilians.
In his final address to the United Nations Security Council in March 2015, UN Middle East Envoy Chief Robert Serry emplored the UNSC to lead the way in creating a lasting framework for Israeli-Palestinian peace. Serry argued that the UNSC presenting a framework for negotiations “may be the only way to preserve the goal of the two-state solution.” Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian envoy to the United Nations, indicated that he would be in favor of this plan and agreed with Serry's comments.
The plans to introduce a UN resolution were delayed awaiting the outcome of the Israeli election. Nevertheless, French officials indicated in March 2015 that they would be willing to take initiative and attempt to jump-start peace talks between the Israelis and Palestinians in the near future. The French Ambassador to the United Nations stated in early March that officials in Paris were committed to garnering UN support for a framework for future negotiations and ending settlements, stating “we won't give up on this.” On March 27, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius told reporters that French officials were going to start talks within the month on a “parameters resolution” for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Netanyahu's Election “Conversion”
The prospects for a two-state solution appeared to dim when, in a last-ditch attempt to swing more right-wing voters, Netanyahu stated the day before the 2015 election that there was no chance of the establishment of a Palestinian state while he remained Prime Minister. Netanyahu had previously hinted that he would be in favor of a two state solution, with an independent Palestinian state existing alongside Israel. In an interview with the Israeli news organization NRG, Netanyahu made his opinion clear, that “whoever moves to establish a Palestinian state or intends to withdraw from territory is simply yielding territory for radical Islamic terrorist attacks against Israel.” When asked if that meant that no Palestinian state would be established while he was Prime Minister, he responded “indeed.”
Isaac Herzog, Netanyahu's main competitor during 2015's election, was in favor of reviving peace talks with Palestinians and working towards a two state solution. Tzipi Livni, Herzog's running-mate, was also interested in restarting peace negotiations with the Palestinians.
Netanyahu won the election and his aides played damage control during the following days, speaking on various news programs trying to convince the world that Netanyahu had not in fact asserted his support for a one state solution. Speaking on English television programs, Netanayhu attempted to backpedal on his statements, claiming what he meant is that the conditions currently don't exist for a two state solution, and in his opinion much needs to change before a two state solution is even considered. President Barack Obama responded to these remarks by Netanyahu, saying that the prospect for Israeli-Palestinian peace seems "very dim" and that the United States is going to be re-evaluating their relationship with Israel in the coming years.
In response to Netanyahu's decisive victory in the March 2015 elections, the Palestinians vowed to increase diplomatic efforts at statehood recognition through different U.N. avenues.
Recent Developments in the Negotiations Process
Diplomats informed the media on April 29, 2015, that the United States had been discretely pressuring France and other countries to not present this "parameters resolution" in an attempt to reignite Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, until after a final nuclear accord is reached between Iran and the P5+1. Wary of pursuing multiple initiatives at once that are both unfavorable to Israel and Israel's supporters in Congress, the representatives from the United States pushed for a significant delay in presenting the measure to the Security Council.
Saeb Erekat, the Palestinian's chief negotiator, stated on May 18, 2015, that there was not a single chance of renewing meaningful peace negotiations with the newly elected Netanyahu government in power.
Although unconfirmed by Israel or Hamas, international diplomats reported on May 18, 2015, that Israeli and Hamas officials had been holding meetings in Europe and Jerusalem, focusing on a possible floating port in the Gaza Strip. In addition to a port, discussions reportedly included a proposition to expand the borders of Gaza into the Sinai. In August 2015 Israel officially denied these talks were taking place, contrary to reports apearing in Arab news outlets.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told European Union Foreign Policy chief Federica Mogherini in May 2015 that he believes “negotiations should be resumed in order to define those areas in which we can build,” echoing sentiment from the U.S. and E.U. that Israel should attempt to re-engage the Palestinians.
Dore Gold, the Director-General of Israel's Foreign Ministry, embarked on a secretive trip to Egypt on June 28, 2015, to engage in discussions with Egyptian officials regarding restarting peace talks with the Palestinians. Egyptian news agencies reported that Gold met with Egyptian officials to discuss “how to push the peace process forward.”
During an address to the United Nations General Assembly on September 30, 2015, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas asserted that the PA was no longer bound by the Oslo Accords as well as all subsequent agreements between the PA and Israel.
Palestinian leaders stoked the flames of violence during September and October 2015, spreading false information about Israel's actions surrounding the Temple Mount. Mahmoud Abbas stated that Israelis were “desecrating” Muslim holy sites the al-Aksa Mosque and Church of the Holy Sepulchre with their “filthy feet,” and encouraged Palestinians to carry out acts of violence against Jewish Israelis. From September 13 - October 21, 2015, 9 Israelis were killed in terror attacks and over 50 were wounded. The wave of violence experienced during late 2015 was due mostly to a Palestinian perception that the Israelis were going to somehow change the rules of who could access the Temple Mount, undermining Muslim supremacy at the holy site. The Israeli government issued official statements clarifying that there was no intention of changing the status-quo at the Temple Mount, but Palestinian leaders continued to incite violence against Israeli Jews through speeches and posts on social media. Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh declared Friday, October 9, to be a “day of rage... a day that will represent that start of a new Intifada in all the land of Palestine.” (Independent, October 9, 2015) U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon travelled to Israel on October 20 to meet with officials, and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry met with Prime Minister Netanyahu later that week to discuss a potential solution to the recent violence. The Israeli and U.S. officials discussed how to reaffirm Israel's commitment to maintaining equitable treatment of all at the Temple Mount and al-Aksa mosque. Afterwards, Kerry told reporters, “I would characterize the conversation as one that gave me a cautious measure of optimism... there may be a way to defuse the situation and begin to find a way forward.”
UN Secretary General Ban ki-Moon had a less optimistic assessment of the situation after meeting with Israeli and Palestinian leaders. According to British Ambassador to the United Nations Matthew Rycroft, members of the UN were “struck by the pessimistic tone” that Ban took during a video briefing with members following his visit to Israel. While summarizing the meetings during a video-call with his UN counterparts, Ban stated that he believed there was a wide gap between the two sides.
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu once again argued on October 28, 2015, that he was ready to meet with Palestinian leaders to dicsuss a lasting peace at any time, but it is the Palestinian leaders who have continually refused such meetings.
French officials announced on January 29, 2016, that they would be spearheading an initiative to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and pledged to recognize the independent state of Palestine if their efforts were to fail. French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius revealed preparation plans for an international conference “to preserve and make happen the two-state solution,” including American, European, and Arab partners. The French initiative to convene an international peace summit to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was presented to Israeli diplomats on February 15, 2016. The French initiative includes a 3-step process: consulting with the parties involved, convening a meeting in Paris of the international negotiation support group including several countries wanting to jump-start the peace process, and finally the summit itself that will hopefully re-start negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians. In contrast to the comments of Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki, who stated during a February visit to Japan that the Palestinians “will never go back and sit again in direct Israeli-Palestinian negotiations,” Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said that he welcomed the French proposal. The proposal was scoffed at by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who called the initiative “bizarre,” and maintained that bilateral negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians was the only was to achieve lasting peace. The official peace effort was launched on March 10, 2016, without the stipulation that Palestine would be automatically recognized by France should the effort fail. French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault stated that “there is never anything automatic. France will present its initiative to its partners. It will be the first step, there is no pre-requisite.” France announced that the first, preliminary meeting would be held on May 30, 2016, in Paris. Although the summit will feature representatives from 20 countries discussing Israeli-Palestinian peace, representatives from Israel and the Palestinian territories were not invited to attend. Assuming the success of this initial summit, Israeli and Palestinian officials were told they would be invited to a second international summit hosted by France later in 2016. The Israeli government formally rejected the French initiative on April 28, 2016. A statement issued by the Prime Minister's Office explained the Israelis position, that “the best way to resolve the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians is direct, bilateral negotiations.” Despite vocal Israeli opposition, French officials made plans to move forward with the “French Initiative.”
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas stated during an interview with Palestinian Channel 2 News during early April that he was willing to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and attempt to negotiate a peace agreement. Netanyahu responded to this on April 4, 2016, telling Abbas that he was willing to meet at any time, and he had “cleared [his] schedule,” in order to meet with the Palestinian leader. Palestinian officials rejected Netanyahu's offer two days later. Chief Palestinian Negotiator Saeb Erekat told a popular Palestinian radio show that the Palestinian government rejects the idea of meeting for peace talks with Israelis without prior conditions being laid out.
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi encouraged Palestinian and Israeli leaders to come to a lasting peace agreement on May 16, 2016, stating that peace between the two groups would in turn “achieve warmer peace” between the Egyptians and Israelis. In response, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu released statement in which he “Welcome[d] Egyptian President El-Sisi's remarks and his willingness to make every effort to advance a future of peace and security between us and the Palestinians.”
Although Netanyahu rejected the “French Initiative” just two weeks prior, during meetings on May 22, 2016 with French Prime Minister Manuel Valls he offered instead to hold direct negotiations with Mahmoud Abbas. These talks would take place in France, and would still be dubbed the “French Initiative,” according to Netanyahu. A spokesperson for PA Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah retorted “Direct negotiations with Mr. Netanyahu in the past have proven to be fruitless; why repeat the same mistakes,” before Hamdallah's meeting with Valls later that afternoon.
Sources: “Israeli official visits Cairo to discuss Palestinian peace talks,” Reuters, (June 28, 2015);
Lubell, Maayan. “Netanyahu offers to resume peace talks with settlement focus, official says,” Reuters, (May 26, 2015);
Toameh, Khaled Abu. “Abbas: Hamas and Israel holding secret talks,” The Jerusalem Post, (May 19, 2015);
Lynch, Colum. “White House to UN: First Iran, then Mideast peace,” Foreign Policy, (April 28, 2015);
Lynch, Colum. “Exclusive: Paris saying 'non' to U.S. control of peace process,” Foreign Policy, (March 26, 2015);
The Assoiated Press. “Outgoing Mideast envoy urges Security Council to present framework for Israeli-Palestinian talks,” Haaretz, (March 26, 2015);
DeYoung, Karen. “Obama remarks dim prospects for Palestinian state,” The Washington Post, (March 24, 2015);
Rudoren, Judy. “Netanyahu apologizes, White House is unmoved,” The New York Times, (March 24, 2015);
Israeli Foreign Ministry ;
Gladstone, Rick/Rudoren, Jodi. “Mahmoud Abbas, PA President, says he is no longer bound by Oslo Accords,” New York Times, (September 30, 2015);
Solomon, Jay/Jones, Rory. “Kerry expresses cautious optimisim after meeting with Netanyahu,” Wall Street Journal, (October 22, 2015);
Olson, Alexandra. “UN chief pessimistic about Israeli-Palestinian peace,” Yahoo News, (October 22, 2015);
Toameh, Khaled Abu/Keinon, Herb.
“Israel welcomes French proposal for Netanyahu-Abbas meeting,” Jerusalem Post, (October 28, 2015);
Dorell, Oren. “France threatens to recognize Palestinian state if no progress with Israel,” USA Today, (January 31, 2016);
Ravid, Barak. “France Presents Middle East Peace Initiative to Israel,” Haaretz, (February 15, 2016);
“France aims to relaunch Israel-Palestinian peace process 'by summer,'” Yahoo News, (March 10, 2016);
Wootliff, Raoul/Ahren, Raphael. “Netanyahu responds to Abbas invite: ‘I’ll be here, any day,’” Times of Israel (April 4, 2016);
Keinon, Herb. “France to convene Mideast summit in May, without Israel or Palestinians,” Jerusalem Post (April 21, 2016);
Keinon, Herb. “Jerusalem rejects French peace initiative,” Jerusalem Post, (April 28, 2016);
“Solving Palestinian-Israeli conflict will make Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty ‘warmer’: Al-Sisi,” Daily News Egypt, (May 18, 2016);
Lazaroff, Tovah. “Palestinians reject Netanyahu’s call for direct Paris talks,”
Jerusalem Post (May 24, 2016)
Wikimedia, By http://www.flickr.com/people/45644610@N03 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/idfonline/8137846834/) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons