|
Learning Together
Executive Summary
Israel has a lot to offer the United States in the field of education,
particularly as it relates to at-risk youth. This has been a focus since
the founding of the state because of the unique demands of educating children
who survived the Holocaust, many of whom were orphans, and meeting the
needs of the large immigrant population, which includes youth from underdeveloped
nations like Ethiopia.
The United States is already benefitting from lessons learned from Israel.
In 1992, Bill Clinton and Al Gore outlined their goals in Putting People
First: How We Can All Change America. In the section on revolutionizing
lifetime learning, Clinton and Gore specifically single out as an example
of an innovative parenting program, the Home Instruction Program for Preschool
Youngsters (HIPPY) developed at Hebrew University. HIPPY was established
in Israel to help children of poor immigrants from Africa and Asia as a
preschool supplement to prepare them for the rigors of Israeli schools.
Clinton and Gore said HIPPY can help disadvantaged parents work
with their children to build an ethic of learning at home that benefits
both parent and child. HIPPY USA was established in 1984 and the
program is now being used by more than 11,000 families with four- and five-year-olds
in 83 communities in 23 states.
HIPPY established the precedent for importing innovative Israeli programs
to the United States for the benefit of American children. Before innovative
ideas can be imported, however, they must be identified. That is the purpose
of this report.
Despite the differences in culture, size, structure and resources between
the United States and Israel, many common problems and common needs can
be found in both countries, such as: early childhood intervention, family
support, day care, school dropouts, academic underachievement, alienated
youth, employment of new technologies and absorption of immigrants. The
United States has many programs to address these problems, but those developed
in Israel may offer better solutions. Israel's smaller size may be an advantage
in making it possible to conceptualize the problems more clearly and to
design programs to deal with them more effectively. This study addresses
the concerns of American educators, decision-makers and planners interested
in:
- Youth At-Risk and Dropout Prevention
- Early Intervention, Child Care and Family Programs
- Gifted and Talented Students
- Residential Education/Boarding Schools
- Computers and Educational Technology
- Adult Training and Development
- Drug, Alcohol and Substance Abuse
- Conflict Resolution and Personal Values
- Special Education
The programs described here can be adapted for use in the United States
and, like HIPPY, can be replicated around the country for the benefit of
Americans. American experience with exemplary programs has been that they
have worked best when adapted to the specific situational needs and context
by local planners; i.e., programs cannot be implemented as is without considering
the students, staff, conditions and resources of the community wrestling
with the same problem area. This report provides information concerning
more than 60 Israeli projects. For each, the goals, target population,
program and activities are described, providing its programmatic essence
and enabling American readers to determine whether to investigate further.
Additional information on the programs discussed here is available either
directly from the sources listed in the report or from the American-Israeli
Cooperative Enterprise. Anyone interested in importing one of these exciting
programs should contact AICE and we will work with you to make the necessary
contacts and to assist in securing funds for a pilot project. Even before
completing this report, AICE successfully introduced one of the programs,
YACHADChildren Tutoring Children in Readingto officials in North
Carolina who have decided to adapt it for use in the third largest school
district. We look forward to working with other communities to import other
innovative Israeli programs for the benefit of their children.
Table of Contents
Previous
Next

|
|